- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Circumcision: Difference between revisions
imported>CurtainMan redundant word |
imported>CurtainMan |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Age of consent for circumcision - 0.png|thumb|Can you spot the flaw?]] | [[File:Age of consent for circumcision - 0.png|thumb|Can you spot the flaw?]] | ||
[[File:No circumcised men - a look into every woman's brain.png|thumb|A look into every woman's brain.]] | |||
'''Circumcision''' (a.k.a. '''genital mutilation''' and '''circumrape''') is the [[Sick Fuck| | '''Circumcision''' (a.k.a. '''genital mutilation''' and '''circumrape''') is the [[Sick Fuck|sexual assault]] of cutting off parts of a person's genitalia, the [[foreskin]] for boys and parts of the vagina for girls, depending in what parts of the world they are circumcised. | ||
It was introduced by [[Jews|reptilian sociopathic aliens]] to [[niggers|mankind's ancestors]]. While originally performed for religious and traditional <s>excuses</s> "reasons", in the 21st century it has become sexual assault disguised as medicine, because people are more easily fooled by fake [[trust the soyence|<s>soyentific</s> "scientific" studies]] than tradition and religion. | |||
Male circumcision is mainly practiced by Morons, contrary to popular belief that Pedophiles do most of the cutting. The main idea for circumcision in the ancient era was lulz, since most civilizations that practiced circumcision were based in hot and dry areas where lulz were scarce. Because nothing's lulzier than mutilating a male against his will and there's not much to lol at in bumfuck 230 BC. | Out of the mammal species, homo sapiens sapiens appear to be the only ones cutting off the foremost part of their male offsprings' reproductive organs, because the homo sapiens sapiens believe they know better than all of the other animal species. | ||
Male circumcision is mainly practiced by Morons, contrary to popular belief that Pedophiles do most of the cutting. The main idea for circumcision in the ancient era was lulz, since most civilizations that practiced circumcision were based in hot and dry areas where lulz were scarce. Because nothing's lulzier than mutilating a male against his will and there's not much to lol at in bumfuck 230 BC. Some parents try to justify letting their offsprings' genitals be reduced with "our ancestors have done it", because "we have always done it this way" and variations thereof are the best possible reasons in existence to commit assault. [[Amirite|Right?]] | |||
Later, the practice of circumcision was adopted by Abrahamic religions, even though it predates said religions with thousand of years and has nothing to do with them. In modern times, male circumcision was popularized, mainly by Christians, in western societies, but fortunately it only got wind in The United States. | Later, the practice of circumcision was adopted by Abrahamic religions, even though it predates said religions with thousand of years and has nothing to do with them. In modern times, male circumcision was popularized, mainly by Christians, in western societies, but fortunately it only got wind in The United States. | ||
Line 28: | Line 31: | ||
Some people resort to mental gymnastics to justify circumcision. They say ''"oh, it doesn't affect sensitivity! It's just your attitude that affects the sensitivity"'' or some crap like that. However, one can only lie to others, not to oneself. 😉 | Some people resort to mental gymnastics to justify circumcision. They say ''"oh, it doesn't affect sensitivity! It's just your attitude that affects the sensitivity"'' or some crap like that. However, one can only lie to others, not to oneself. 😉 | ||
[[File:Mental gymnastics to justify circumcision.png|thumb|center|640px|Would ya look at that! The [[:category:circumphiles|circumphiles]] at Wikipedia have found a new coping strategy in 2023!]] | [[File:Mental gymnastics to justify circumcision.png|thumb|center|640px|Would ya look at that! The [[:category:circumphiles|circumphiles]] at Wikipedia have found a new coping strategy in 2023!]] | ||
What kind of person would have a positive attitude towards having a part cut off from their body without their approval, especially as a defenseless infant? | What kind of person would have a positive attitude towards having had a part cut off from their body without their approval, especially as a defenseless infant? | ||
==Examples Of [[irl trolling|Incorrect Knowledge]] On Circumcision== | ==Examples Of [[irl trolling|Incorrect Knowledge]] On Circumcision== | ||
Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
[[Star Wars|A long long time ago in a country far away]] a man called John Kellog decided it would be fun to [[Torture|cut boys penises off and pour acid on girls clits]]. This was obviously enjoyed because the government decided to make it lolimportant in a high percentage of newborns. Since then the American doctors want to team up with the [[Jews]] to create random facts so more people will circumcise their kids so [[Pedophilia|pedotricians]] can keep making [[money]]. | [[Star Wars|A long long time ago in a country far away]] a man called John Kellog decided it would be fun to [[Torture|cut boys penises off and pour acid on girls clits]]. This was obviously enjoyed because the government decided to make it lolimportant in a high percentage of newborns. Since then the American doctors want to team up with the [[Jews]] to create random facts so more people will circumcise their kids so [[Pedophilia|pedotricians]] can keep making [[money]]. | ||
Circumcision is also promoted by [[Wikipedia|Wikipedia, the Internet's sacred cow of knowledge]], because the [[Wikipedia Admin Gallery|those who decide who is allowed to edit]], especially [[James Heilman|this circumphile]], are circumcised themselves and do not want the idea that they are complete and undamaged men threatened. They want to believe their goomba | Circumcision is also promoted by [[Wikipedia|Wikipedia, the Internet's sacred cow of knowledge]], because the [[Wikipedia Admin Gallery|those who decide who is allowed to edit]], especially [[James Heilman|this circumphile (James Heilman)]], are circumcised themselves and do not want the idea that they are complete and undamaged men threatened. They want to believe their goomba dicks are just perfect. But deep inside, they know they are defective.<ref name=circpromo /> | ||
Here's some facts you can expect to hear: | Here's some facts you can expect to hear: | ||
*''"Circumcision is HYGIENIC!!11!!1!1!!"'' scream the circumphiles. - Indeed, if you never take a shower in your life. | *''"Circumcision is HYGIENIC[[oneoneone|!!11!!1!1!!]]"'' scream the circumphiles. - Indeed, if you never take a shower in your life. | ||
** Removing the hands of babies would mean a 100% decrease in hangnails, dirt under nails, arthritis in the fingers, and carpal tunnel syndrome. It also would reduce the spread of foodborne illness that is most often spread through people failing to wash their hands. | |||
*''Circumcision is "[[political correctness|generally]]" safe<ref>'''{{wikilink|Circumcision#Adverse_effects|Circumcision § Adverse effects - Wikipedia}}''': "Neonatal circumcision is generally a safe, low-risk procedure when done by an experienced practitioner" (9 October 2023) (warning: circumphile propaganda)</ref> - only about 100 babies bleed to death each year!'' And skin bridges? ''"Nah, that's an urban myth. Trust us, because we, the medical industry, would never dare to sacrifice your son's well-being for cash! Your son is the center of our world!"'' | *''Circumcision is "[[political correctness|generally]]" safe<ref>'''{{wikilink|Circumcision#Adverse_effects|Circumcision § Adverse effects - Wikipedia}}''': "Neonatal circumcision is generally a safe, low-risk procedure when done by an experienced practitioner" (9 October 2023) (warning: circumphile propaganda)</ref> - only about 100 babies bleed to death each year!'' And skin bridges? ''"Nah, that's an urban myth. Trust us, because we, the medical industry, would never dare to sacrifice your son's well-being for cash! Your son is the center of our world!"'' | ||
*''Circumcision lowers chances of getting STDs, it's true we tested it in Africa! Because a lack of foreskin prevents diseases from entering the urethra, [[amirite]]? RIGHT??????'' - The test results showed cut men who didn't wash were more likely to get STDs than uncut men who didn't. Cut/Uncut Men who did wash had equal chances. | *''Circumcision lowers chances of getting STDs, it's true we tested it in Africa! Because a lack of foreskin prevents diseases from entering the urethra, [[amirite]]? RIGHT??????'' - The test results showed cut men who didn't wash were more likely to get STDs than uncut men who didn't. Cut/Uncut Men who did wash had equal chances. | ||
Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
**Would you like to know what an actual sexual tool is? The part of the penis which has both an outer surface and an inner surface, and has nerve endings on both sides, and which can roll back and forth, stimulating the glans with its entire inner surface, causing it and the glans to stimulate each other. Can you guess which body part that is? | **Would you like to know what an actual sexual tool is? The part of the penis which has both an outer surface and an inner surface, and has nerve endings on both sides, and which can roll back and forth, stimulating the glans with its entire inner surface, causing it and the glans to stimulate each other. Can you guess which body part that is? | ||
*''"The […] studies uniformly found that circumcision had no overall adverse effect on penile sensitivity"'' - from ''Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review'' by circumphile Brian J. Morris and circumcision device patent owner John N. Krieger. [[sarcasm|Clearly no conflict of interest.]]<ref>[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23937309/ Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review - Brian J Morris 1 , John N Krieger] (warning: circumphile propaganda)</ref> - "Systematic review"? More like "systematic mental gymnastics". And why is the word "overall" necessary? Circumcision either does affect sensitivity or it does not. There is no middle ground. Are they so unsure that they have to obscure the concluding phrase with this empty meaningless weasel word "overall"? | *''"The […] studies uniformly found that circumcision had no overall adverse effect on penile sensitivity"'' - from ''Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review'' by circumphile Brian J. Morris and circumcision device patent owner John N. Krieger. [[sarcasm|Clearly no conflict of interest.]]<ref>[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23937309/ Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review - Brian J Morris 1 , John N Krieger] (warning: circumphile propaganda)</ref> - "Systematic review"? More like "systematic mental gymnastics". And why is the word "overall" necessary? Circumcision either does affect sensitivity or it does not. There is no middle ground. Are they so unsure that they have to obscure the concluding phrase with this empty meaningless weasel word "overall"? | ||
* ''"Circumcision is world's oldest and most common surgery!"'', ''"All our ancestors have done it!"'' - ah, the classic "we have always done it that way" argument. When in history was this a justification to commit harm? Also, having peer pressure from dead people is unbelievably foolish. | |||
*''"Circumcision reduces the chance of an infection with a sexually transmitted disease (STD) by SIXTY PERCENTS!!!!11!!!11!"''<ref>[https://vimeo.com/116934977 Medical Male Circumcision Infographic] (warning: circumphile propaganda)</ref> - Oh really? First of all, no mention of whether the statistic is relative or absolute. Watch: {{ytlink|bVG2OQp6jEQ|This is How Easy It Is to Lie With Statistics}}. Second, even if it were true, it does not negate the need for condoms. Third, how is the lack of foreskin supposed to prevent diseases from entering the urethra? Physics 101. | *''"Circumcision reduces the chance of an infection with a sexually transmitted disease (STD) by SIXTY PERCENTS!!!!11!!!11!"''<ref>[https://vimeo.com/116934977 Medical Male Circumcision Infographic] (warning: circumphile propaganda)</ref> - Oh really? First of all, no mention of whether the statistic is relative or absolute. Watch: {{ytlink|bVG2OQp6jEQ|This is How Easy It Is to Lie With Statistics}}. Second, even if it were true, it does not negate the need for condoms. Third, how is the lack of foreskin supposed to prevent diseases from entering the urethra? Physics 101. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 24 January 2024
WARNING: With Jews, you lose! |
Circumcision (a.k.a. genital mutilation and circumrape) is the sexual assault of cutting off parts of a person's genitalia, the foreskin for boys and parts of the vagina for girls, depending in what parts of the world they are circumcised.
It was introduced by reptilian sociopathic aliens to mankind's ancestors. While originally performed for religious and traditional excuses "reasons", in the 21st century it has become sexual assault disguised as medicine, because people are more easily fooled by fake soyentific "scientific" studies than tradition and religion.
Out of the mammal species, homo sapiens sapiens appear to be the only ones cutting off the foremost part of their male offsprings' reproductive organs, because the homo sapiens sapiens believe they know better than all of the other animal species.
Male circumcision is mainly practiced by Morons, contrary to popular belief that Pedophiles do most of the cutting. The main idea for circumcision in the ancient era was lulz, since most civilizations that practiced circumcision were based in hot and dry areas where lulz were scarce. Because nothing's lulzier than mutilating a male against his will and there's not much to lol at in bumfuck 230 BC. Some parents try to justify letting their offsprings' genitals be reduced with "our ancestors have done it", because "we have always done it this way" and variations thereof are the best possible reasons in existence to commit assault. Right?
Later, the practice of circumcision was adopted by Abrahamic religions, even though it predates said religions with thousand of years and has nothing to do with them. In modern times, male circumcision was popularized, mainly by Christians, in western societies, but fortunately it only got wind in The United States.
At times when commercials showed doctors encouraging smoking as a healthy past time,[1] other commercials convinced people the same about circumcision, which mainly was pushed because of a Christian agenda which focused on how to stop boys from masturbating and because doctors will gladly take your money to cut off whatever you want from your child so long as he's too stupid to come back and murder their asses for literally sexually assaulting him with a knife. Thus, more than 70% of the males in the States are circumcised. Since then, the percentage of circumcised male newborns is slowly dropping, with the help of information against circumcision resurfacing on the internet, information that the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality buried decades ago for unknown reasons.
All of the so called healthy benefits of circumcision were debunked a long time ago even though most people that defend circumcision are circumcised themselves and are trying to inflate their confidence, or they're idiots who defend it purely for aesthetic reasons, mostly women who disregard their own hanging meatflaps or the fact that uncut dicks would make them cum ten times faster. Most of them suffer from extreme butthurtness, or better said, dickhurtness because of their inferiority complex and knowing the fact that a cut dick can never go back. Some sued their parents, which surprisingly won them a pretty penny. Others are so lost in their own bullshit, they started believing it. But most suffer from Stockholm syndrome, painting themselves in a pseudo-high-caliber color while covering their ears, closing their eyes and chanting how superior they are. Just like rape victims who do not acknowledge or admit that they where in fact raped. Sadly, these males are rooted into a mentality that boys born natural are defective, which is a macabre reaction to their own mutilation.[2]
Circumraped mens' sexual organ has the aesthetics of a rotten mushroom and a goomba. They will never feel real sex, they will never feel real intimacy or masturbation, and they will never be complete again. Always a part missing. Always circus freaks. Hence, they are easily triggered.
-
An intact, non-circumcised penis
-
Circumcised penis, also known as goomba dick. You be the judge.
All that remains to circumcised men is a cheap trial version of sex. The full version is reserved for natural and complete men. In effect, circumcised men have a lifetime ban from sex. So many men with a goomba penis cope with their lifetime ban from sex by promoting and glorifying circumcision. By pretending that being circumraped is no big deal and that a foreskin is just a useless appendix. Men with a goomba penis men have a tendency to downplay what they know they will never have. Commonly, they claim a goomba is "more hygienic" than a complete penis, "lasts longer in bed", and "protects from sexually transmitted diseases", and make up fake studies to try to prove it. Or they cite "highly trustworthy" studies by some Nigerian Kenyan Ugandan prince professor. These claims have been refuted in the examples of incorrect knowledge on circumcision.
Some people resort to mental gymnastics to justify circumcision. They say "oh, it doesn't affect sensitivity! It's just your attitude that affects the sensitivity" or some crap like that. However, one can only lie to others, not to oneself. 😉
What kind of person would have a positive attitude towards having had a part cut off from their body without their approval, especially as a defenseless infant?
Examples Of Incorrect Knowledge On Circumcision
A long long time ago in a country far away a man called John Kellog decided it would be fun to cut boys penises off and pour acid on girls clits. This was obviously enjoyed because the government decided to make it lolimportant in a high percentage of newborns. Since then the American doctors want to team up with the Jews to create random facts so more people will circumcise their kids so pedotricians can keep making money.
Circumcision is also promoted by Wikipedia, the Internet's sacred cow of knowledge, because the those who decide who is allowed to edit, especially this circumphile (James Heilman), are circumcised themselves and do not want the idea that they are complete and undamaged men threatened. They want to believe their goomba dicks are just perfect. But deep inside, they know they are defective.[2]
Here's some facts you can expect to hear:
- "Circumcision is HYGIENIC!!11!!1!1!!" scream the circumphiles. - Indeed, if you never take a shower in your life.
- Removing the hands of babies would mean a 100% decrease in hangnails, dirt under nails, arthritis in the fingers, and carpal tunnel syndrome. It also would reduce the spread of foodborne illness that is most often spread through people failing to wash their hands.
- Circumcision is "generally" safe[3] - only about 100 babies bleed to death each year! And skin bridges? "Nah, that's an urban myth. Trust us, because we, the medical industry, would never dare to sacrifice your son's well-being for cash! Your son is the center of our world!"
- Circumcision lowers chances of getting STDs, it's true we tested it in Africa! Because a lack of foreskin prevents diseases from entering the urethra, amirite? RIGHT?????? - The test results showed cut men who didn't wash were more likely to get STDs than uncut men who didn't. Cut/Uncut Men who did wash had equal chances.
- Circumcision doesn't actually remove 20,000 nerve endings, it's just a fold of skin! -A circumcised person. - The foreskin is used to protect the glans from damage up until the age where you need to stop being a lazy fuck and pull it back to keep cheese out. It contains a lot of blood vessels and nerve endings unluckily for you. However these nerve endings feel slightly less than the ones on the head, but the Jews are way ahead of you! Having your foreskin removed means your head will be rubbing against everything decreasing it's sensitivity to match your lack of nerve endings. TL;DR, yes it does remove them.
- Circumcision makes you last longer in bed! - The time you last in bed is only 20% controlled by sensativity and is 80% controlled by your brain. DOES THAT MEAN I LAST 20% LONGER! COOL! (bad thing you barely feel anything)
- He will look like other guys in the changing room! - Ok now you're just being a fag. Why would you want his/your cock to look like another man's in a changing room? Besides circumcision is the minority now so either go back in time by about 30 years or cry as your gay son is laughed at in the changing room for being the odd one out.
- "It was the purpose of this investigation, therefore, to determine if women, particularly mothers who recently made a decision about circumcision of their newborn sons, do indeed prefer circumcised sexual partners"[4] - Shouldn't matter to you as the mother of your son, unless, of course, you are planning on having sex with your son.
- "The permanent exposure of the glans of the penis renders it a sexual tool."[4] - This basically is an admission of failure. Is the glans supposed to be a "sexual tool" 24 hours per day, 7 days per week? Only in a world where men are sexually active 24 hours per day and 7 days per week. An erection causes a foreskin to retract automatically when necessary, meaning during sex, anyway. Does that not "render the glans a sexual tool"?
- Would you like to know what an actual sexual tool is? The part of the penis which has both an outer surface and an inner surface, and has nerve endings on both sides, and which can roll back and forth, stimulating the glans with its entire inner surface, causing it and the glans to stimulate each other. Can you guess which body part that is?
- "The […] studies uniformly found that circumcision had no overall adverse effect on penile sensitivity" - from Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review by circumphile Brian J. Morris and circumcision device patent owner John N. Krieger. Clearly no conflict of interest.[5] - "Systematic review"? More like "systematic mental gymnastics". And why is the word "overall" necessary? Circumcision either does affect sensitivity or it does not. There is no middle ground. Are they so unsure that they have to obscure the concluding phrase with this empty meaningless weasel word "overall"?
- "Circumcision is world's oldest and most common surgery!", "All our ancestors have done it!" - ah, the classic "we have always done it that way" argument. When in history was this a justification to commit harm? Also, having peer pressure from dead people is unbelievably foolish.
- "Circumcision reduces the chance of an infection with a sexually transmitted disease (STD) by SIXTY PERCENTS!!!!11!!!11!"[6] - Oh really? First of all, no mention of whether the statistic is relative or absolute. Watch: This is How Easy It Is to Lie With Statistics. Second, even if it were true, it does not negate the need for condoms. Third, how is the lack of foreskin supposed to prevent diseases from entering the urethra? Physics 101.
If circumcision actually had health benefits for the patient (hint: it doesn't), circumphiles' argument reads like "Sex has health benefits, therefore let's lower the age of consent for sex to 0!" - Should the age of consent for sex be lowered to zero because sex has health benefits? You can answer that for yourself.
The glorious Glenn Beck pwns foreskin man
|
Crawling In My (Fore)skin, This Wound It Will Not Heal
Few things get people as excited on the Internets as circumcision, because discussing other people's penises on the internets makes gay people happy and causes outbursts of rage in the straight community. If you lurk the chans, be sure to drop a "cut vs uncut" thread on there for lulz and drama, and make sure to mention uncuts are superior to force the argument. If you say cuts are superior you'll just get anti-lulz and fail. The most vocal opponents are the majority of all internets, who prefer their sausages with casings. To quote an expert:
—A gay homosexual |
Sex with a circumcised penis is a shallow chore, where as sex with a foreskin is a deep ecstasy that will blow one out of reality.
Whenever someone brings the topic up, the conversation usually involves most guys not giving a shit about it and smart people freaking out and using a form of the word "mutilated" in every post. Then the pedos (who love circumcision) start to freak out, sensing a threat to their supply of masturbation material - photos of circumcised baby penises. White trash moms (who love to make their babies dicks look AND smell like shit) team up with the douchebags and shit gets out of hand.
According to statistics, there are more white people circumcised than trained monkeys or jews currently in America. However niggers have a bigger penis than you, which is obviously a coincidence. Circumcision has been shown to cause both erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation: the former because removing that "piece of skin" means there is less actual skin to stretch during an erection, which is particularly true in high and tight cuts (you probably don't have to worry if you have a low and loose in which case you are significantly closer to being normal); and the latter because less nerves means you have less sensation of when you're about to cum. This leads to Americunts getting all-cut-over circumcisions and making up more facts about circumcision to make themselves feel better.
What it boils down to is this: if you're raping something asleep, you want to cum ASAP for maximal escape chance. Keeping your penis is a proven method of jizzing quick. Also, if one is uncircumcised, you are a true male, due to the ability to bring lulz from clever tricks using this skin. See foreskin.
Also did I mention newborns are circumcised without anesthetic?
Along with this, you aren't butthurt and hunted for being a Jew.
However, you are probably never going to have sex anyhow, so you can disregard most of this article as it really doesn't matter either way. Arguing over circumcision on teh interwebs is like two cripples arguing over who has stronger legs. Though if you really must have a handy tip; for cuts: say the uncut guy has a higher chance of catching STDs, which is a lie and will cause major drama because of it. For uncuts: say the cut guy feels nothing during sex because of his lacking of an extra 20,000 nerve endings, and be sure to have links to articles proving this number otherwise you'll just generate anti-lulz such as "oh yeah well I highly doubt theres any nerves in that piece of skin." Use this for example: The foreskin is srs bsns.
Female Circumcision
Broads can get their clits lobbed off too. Ouch. Unlike circumcision, this is illegal to perform without consent and can't be forced on babies. Unless you are in some small village in the middle of Nowhere, Afurika or any of the islamic European countries (which is every European country). In which case, you can get away with it. The preferred method is a piece of broken glass or battery acid (Now you can be just like John H Kellog!), but a cat is fine too. Fuck the clit! They don't need one anyway!
Forekin Restoration
Some men who were dickhurt over having been circumcised during infancy feel the need to restore their foreskins,although this is pointless because they will never regain the 20,000 nerve endings lost in the procedure and only Eurofags and homosexuals like foreskin despite the fact that 99.9% of consenting women would not know the difference even if they were trying to suck two cocks at once.
Jews
See: Metzizah_b’peh
During Jewish circumcision, the mohel (specially trained pedophile who performs the operation) will finger the foreskin, molest the infant to achieve erection, cut off the over 50% of his dick skin, then suck the blood out of the open wound. Seriously, I couldn't make this shit up if I tried.
In 2005, some mohel who did this shit in New York gave three kids herpes. One of them died. The mayor, Jew, tried to get the Jew Kings of New York to stop. Here's a screenshot:
Jews have a Party where they invite everyone over to brag about their newborn son's half incher and then joyously allow someone (usually picked by whoever has the sharpest knife with them) the right to mutilate the helpless infant and then suck the blood off (not all Jews, just the extra Jewy kind, the kind that will shoot your kid and bomb your hospital because it is manifest destiny to own your land because G-D promised it to him). While the Jews watch the babies penis get molested and mutilated they enjoy various snacks as watching a babies penis bleed is known to increase a Jew's appetite by over 9000. Often times if the parents are not stocked up on enough cocktail weiners/bananas/other phallic looking foods then the foreskin of the victim is ingested ritually.
Previous Video | Next Video |
SeaNiggers Are The New Jews
Filipinos with enough sense to avoid having their genitals mutilated with a machete and a coconut are mocked out of jealously for their fully functional dicks with the slur "supot" meaning "I'd love to suck your gorgeous intact sausage."
After centuries of unhygienic BME sponsored tribal initiations of 9-14 year old boys, many dumbfuck Filipinos ended up brainwashing themselves into believing mutilated pindicks make you taller instead of the fact puberty naturally occurs after the age of initiation anyway (SERIOUSLY!). Seanigger dipshits idiotically became more enthusiastic about slicing up their own cocks after thinking they could reverse their midget height, however their minuscule stature, tiny dicks and self-inflicted mutilation are all permanent. EPIC SELF-PWNAGE!
It's no surprise the world's most infamous self-hating jew Bobby Fischer was very fond of the self-hatred he shared with Filipinos, so much so that he honored them with his first annual September 11 celebration being broadcast on Filipino radio.
List of circumcised men
- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
- Ben Affleck
- Woody Allen
- Prince Andrew, Duke of York
- Mel Brooks
- Jerry Brown
- Jimmy Carter
- Charles, Prince of Wales
- Robert DeNiro
- Michael Douglas
- Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex
- King George V
- Mel Gibson
- Jeff Goldblum
- Gene Simmons ✡
- John F. Kennedy
- Bruce Lee
- Bill Maher
- Barack Obama, Sr.
- Al Pacino
- Daniel Radcliffe
- Joe Rogan
- Arnold Schwarzenegger
- Al Sharpton
- Sylvester Stallone
- Howard Stern
- Andrew Sullivan
- John Travolta
- John Wayne
- Jayjg
People Who Approve Of Circumcision
- 16 year old girls
- AmeriCUNTs
- Feminists
- Jews
- John Harvey Kellogg He started the circumcision trend to save you from masturbation related deaths.
- Muslims
- Africans
- Filipinos
- South Koreans
- Kofi Annan
- Pedophiles
- People who don't want STDs and are too lazy/stupid to use a condom or who've read wiki answers frequently
- Bill Gates - he's jealous of your big, black wang.
- Your Mom
- People who are missing pieces of their dick.
People Who Disapprove Of Circumcision
- Eurofags
- Canadians
- Catholics
- Alcoholics
- South Americans
- North Koreans
- Japanese
- Dogs
- Foreskins
- Faggots
- Jay Naylor
- Foreskin Man
- People who love dickcheese
- People who have all of their dick
- 90% of the world Srsly no political candidate in history EVER has even come close to such a margin.
Internet articles full of lies and fail
Protip: You're getting trolled! -A circumcised person.
- Bill Gates knows all about Mutilation
- Niggers are worries about getting AIDS so they stopped using condoms and joined the government
- Cutting it off will change how my brain works so i can last 2-3 times longer!
- Yahoo answers knows best
- He was obviously in Jerusalem, in America now only about 35% circumcised, unless you live in Miami.
- As if the government was already had enough, the woman in the picture is old and probably has AIDS too
Videos
|
Dickhurt Gallery
See Also
- Anti-semitism
- BME
- Circlist
- Drama
- Smegma
- Docking
- Foreskin
- Zionist Conspiracy
- Metzizah b’peh -Legalized Jewish pedophilia/guro done for the lulz
External Links
- NY Times - What happens in New York City, stays in New York City.
- Hitchens on Cocksucking - Christopher Hitchens is butthurt about circumcision.
- NOCIRC - Some people who don't want doctors to be pedophiles
- CIRCINFO - Some people who think that cutting skin off your cock will give you magic Jesus powerz
Ambiguous- Some people who might not care either way (dead) (Archived)- FARK Forums - An example of intelligent discourse regarding circumcision
- Artificial foreskin! It's like having a foreskin you can't feel! <---don't buy,the moisture still escapes. Buy this instead you dickhurt fuck.
- San Fagsisco bans circumcision, Jews are outraged Banning circumcision is antisemitic and racist!
- Black woman circumcises son with pliers and a box cutter to save money
Baby gets herpes after getting mongled by a rabbi(dead) (Archived)- Israeli woman fined $140 per day for refusing to cut son's dick off -Give me your shekels goy! Oy vey! It'd another shoah!
Circumcision harm known in 1996(dead) (Archived)
Circumcision is part of a series on Visit the Sex Portal for complete coverage. |
- ↑ More Doctors Smoke Camels Than Any Other Cigarette
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Why would someone promote circumcision for reasons completely unrelated to money?
- ↑ Circumcision § Adverse effects - Wikipedia: "Neonatal circumcision is generally a safe, low-risk procedure when done by an experienced practitioner" (9 October 2023) (warning: circumphile propaganda)
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 CIRCLIST - women's preferences (Archived) (warning: circumphile propaganda)
- ↑ Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review - Brian J Morris 1 , John N Krieger (warning: circumphile propaganda)
- ↑ Medical Male Circumcision Infographic (warning: circumphile propaganda)