Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

LOGIC AND REASON: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
imported>Owl
No edit summary
imported>Gghouck
No edit summary
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Logic and Reason''' is what happens when intellectually pubescent [[basement-dwellers]] attempt to handle philosophical topics that rest beyond their limits of cognitive power. In short, they are the twin gods worshiped by the [[hardcore]] [[13-year-old boy|atheists]] that inhabit [[Facebook|the]] [[Reddit|piss]] [[9gag|containers]] of the Internet. Due to its popularity among some of the [[neckbeards|lesser species]] of the Internet, invocation of Logic and Reason is diagnostic criteria for determining whether an Internet-goer is a full-blown, self-fellating [[pseudo-intellectual]] or just a standard [[douchebag]].
[[File:Spock.jpg|thumb|The patron saint of Logic and Reason. Logic and Reason tells us your mom is a [[whore]]]]


'''Logic and Reason''' is what happens when intellectually pubescent [[basement-dwellers]] attempt to handle philosophical topics that rest beyond their limits of cognitive power. In short, they are the twin gods worshiped by the [[hardcore]] [[13-year-old boy|atheists]] that inhabit [[Facebook|the]] [[Reddit|piss]] [[9gag|containers]] of the Internet. Due to its popularity among some of the [[neckbeards|lesser species]] of the Internet, invocation of Logic and Reason is diagnostic criteria for determining whether an Internet-goer is a full-blown, self-fellating [[Intellectual|pseudo-intellectual]] or just a standard [[douchebag]].


== Or, "I don't know the difference between humans and robots." ==
== Or, "I don't know the difference between humans and robots." ==


Sometime within the past few years, a couple of [[lazy|misunderstood]] [[I_have_a_140_IQ|geniuses]] decided that Enlightenment philosophy had gone out of vogue 250 years too early. Instead of subscribing to the overwhelmingly-held view that people perceive the world differently, they concluded that there was absolute truth to everything. Conveniently, these absolute truths matched up with the viewpoints that these [[misogyny|brilliant]] [[eugenics|minds]] [[atheism|already]] [[Marxism|held]]. According to these individuals, the only way to see the world ~clearly~ is with the help of [[bullshit|empirical science]] and, of course, Logic and Reason- emotion be damned. Never mind the [[fact]] that human emotion and intuition are [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262603002859 necessary for effective decision-making]; so much as suggesting this to a Logic and Reason devotee will cause their chins to quiver in anger. After all, they are ''scientists'' (because 'atheist' ''obviously'' means 'scientists' nowadays), who are you to [[flame_war|challenge]] [[USI|them]]?
[[File:ratheism.jpg|thumb|400px|left|'As a scholar of Logic and Reason, I see religion more profoundly than religious people.']]
 
Sometime within the past few years, a couple of [[lazy|misunderstood]] [[I_have_a_140_IQ|geniuses]] decided that Enlightenment philosophy had gone out of vogue 250 years too early. Instead of subscribing to the overwhelmingly-held view that people perceive the world differently, they concluded that there was absolute truth to everything. Conveniently, these absolute truths matched up with the viewpoints that these [[misogyny|brilliant]] [[eugenics|minds]] [[atheism|already]] [[Marxism|held]]. According to these individuals, the only way to see the world ~clearly~ is with the help of [[bullshit|empirical science]] and, of course, Logic and Reason: emotion be damned. Never mind the [[fact]] that human emotion and intuition are [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262603002859 necessary for effective decision-making]; so much as suggesting this to a Logic and Reason devotee will cause their chins to quiver in anger. After all, they are ''scientists'' (because 'atheist' ''obviously'' means 'scientists' nowadays): who are you to [[flame_war|challenge]] [[USI|them]]?
 
== Logical and Reasonable Activities ==
 
* Arguing with Christians on Facebook
* [[auto-fellatio|Self-Fellatio]]
* Accusing others of creating [[strawman|strawman arguments]]
* [[circlejerk|Fellating other Logical and Reasonable geniuses]]
* Complaining about the [[friendzone]]
* Creating [[cancer|image macros]]
* Discreetly supporting [[eugenics]]
* [[Minecraft]]
* Using and accusing others of [[fallacious reasoning]].
* Creating tl;dr rants about why they're autistic saviors from humanity's immanent stupidity.
* Bullying grieving families over memorial crosses. Because, you know, that's what secular humanism is all about.


== Enemies of LOGIC and REASON ==
== Enemies of LOGIC and REASON ==
[[File:Logicandreason.png|thumb|200px|Liking Logic and Reason on Facebook makes you part of the cognitive elite.]]


* Religious folks
* Religious folks
* Women
* Women
* [[Republicans]]
* [[Republicans]]
* [[Liberals]]
* Anyone without a degree in programming
* Anyone without a degree in programming
* [[OWS|The 1%]]
* AmeriKKKans who don't hate their country
* AmeriKKKans who don't hate their country
* Americans who DO hate their country
* Ironically, anyone who doesn't share a "rational First World Westerner lifestyle" like them
* Agnostics
* Agnostics
* Vegans
* Vegans
Line 23: Line 46:
* [[arabs|Non-whites]]
* [[arabs|Non-whites]]
* [[Reddit#r.2FAtheism|Anyone who doesn't eat babies]] [[I'm_so_random|lol xD]]
* [[Reddit#r.2FAtheism|Anyone who doesn't eat babies]] [[I'm_so_random|lol xD]]
== Logic and Reason in the Wild ==
If you encounter somebody ([[irony|non-ironically]]) worshiping Logic and Reason on the Internet or elsewhere, your best option is to run away else risk receiving a fatal overdose of [[smug]]. If you do decide to [[troll|point out the stupidity]] of following an outdated philosophy, be aware that you are fighting an uphill battle. These individuals lack the necessary self-awareness to realize that their viewpoints may be wrong and will always leave an argument feeling just as brilliant as ever.
== See Also ==
* [[Logic]]
* [[Occam's Razor]]
* [[Ben Shapiro]] - Thinks he understands how this works.
* [[Atheism]]
* [[Read a book]]
* [[I have a 140 IQ]]
* [[Reddit]]
* [[Law and Order|LAW AND ORDER]]
* [[Trying too hard]]
* [[Intellectual|Pseudo-intellectual]]
* [[Smug]]
* [[Onigojirakaiju]] is a faggot who has none.
* [[You amuse me]]
{{atheism}}
{{language}}
[[Category:Logic]]
[[Category:Drama-generating techniques]]
[[Category:Communicae]]

Latest revision as of 05:42, 6 June 2023

The patron saint of Logic and Reason. Logic and Reason tells us your mom is a whore

Logic and Reason is what happens when intellectually pubescent basement-dwellers attempt to handle philosophical topics that rest beyond their limits of cognitive power. In short, they are the twin gods worshiped by the hardcore atheists that inhabit the piss containers of the Internet. Due to its popularity among some of the lesser species of the Internet, invocation of Logic and Reason is diagnostic criteria for determining whether an Internet-goer is a full-blown, self-fellating pseudo-intellectual or just a standard douchebag.

Or, "I don't know the difference between humans and robots."

'As a scholar of Logic and Reason, I see religion more profoundly than religious people.'

Sometime within the past few years, a couple of misunderstood geniuses decided that Enlightenment philosophy had gone out of vogue 250 years too early. Instead of subscribing to the overwhelmingly-held view that people perceive the world differently, they concluded that there was absolute truth to everything. Conveniently, these absolute truths matched up with the viewpoints that these brilliant minds already held. According to these individuals, the only way to see the world ~clearly~ is with the help of empirical science and, of course, Logic and Reason: emotion be damned. Never mind the fact that human emotion and intuition are necessary for effective decision-making; so much as suggesting this to a Logic and Reason devotee will cause their chins to quiver in anger. After all, they are scientists (because 'atheist' obviously means 'scientists' nowadays): who are you to challenge them?

Logical and Reasonable Activities

Enemies of LOGIC and REASON

Liking Logic and Reason on Facebook makes you part of the cognitive elite.

Logic and Reason in the Wild

If you encounter somebody (non-ironically) worshiping Logic and Reason on the Internet or elsewhere, your best option is to run away else risk receiving a fatal overdose of smug. If you do decide to point out the stupidity of following an outdated philosophy, be aware that you are fighting an uphill battle. These individuals lack the necessary self-awareness to realize that their viewpoints may be wrong and will always leave an argument feeling just as brilliant as ever.

See Also


LOGIC AND REASON
is part of a series on
Atheism
Gods & Methodology [-+]
High Priests [-+]
Denominations & Organizations [-+]
Followers [-+]
Sheeple & Heresies [-+]
Accessories & Related Concepts [-+]
LOGIC AND REASON is part of a series on Language & Communication
Languages and Dialects • Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, Style, and Usage • Rhetorical Strategies • Poetry • The Politics of Language and Communication • Media • Visual Rhetoric
Click topics to expand
Retrieved from "http://edramatica.com/index.php?title=LOGIC_AND_REASON&oldid=1384807"