Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Internet Watch Foundation: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Unknown
 
imported>Lolyunohavgudsoftware
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Reportillegalcontent.jpg|thumb|[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxitX4UNkxo CLICK HERE REPORT ILLEGAL CONTENT]]]
[[Image:Reportillegalcontent.jpg|thumb|[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxitX4UNkxo CLICK HERE REPORT ILLEGAL CONTENT]]]
[[Image:KILL IT.jpg|thumb|[[KILL IT WITH FIRE]]]]
[[Image:KILL IT.jpg|thumb|[[KILL IT WITH FIRE]]]]
[[Image:Slavery motivational.jpg|thumb|The IWF considers this image to be illegal.]]
[[Image:Slavery motivational.jpg|thumb|The IWF considers this image to be illegal.]]
[[Image:Chillingeffects.jpg|thumb|It removes things from [[Google]] searches.]]
[[Image:Chillingeffects.jpg|thumb|It removes things from [[Google]] searches.]]
The '''Internet Watch Foundation''' is a [[UK]]-based organisation which does exactly what it says on the [[brb, soup|tin]] - watches the [[Internet]]. More precisely, it watches out for various types of [[internet law|illegal]] content - most prominently [[CP]], but it also won't tolerate [[racism|racist]] material or [[terrorist]] websites. This is all very much understandable in itself, but [[some argue]] that they are using their powers to scare people out of being able to exercise their right to [[censorship|freedom of speech]] online.
The '''Internet Watch Foundation''' is a [[UK]]-based organisation which does exactly what it says on the [[brb, soup|tin]] - watches the [[Internet]]. More precisely, it watches out for various types of [[internet law|illegal]] content - most prominently [[CP]], but it also won't tolerate [[racism|racist]] material or [[terrorist]] websites. This is all very much understandable in itself, but [[some argue]] that they are using their powers to scare people out of being able to exercise their right to [[censorship|freedom of speech]] online.


Line 10: Line 10:
It's clear that a site like the IWF would need to be based in Britain, given the [[batshit crazy|hysteria]] surrounding online content stirred up by [[tabloid]]s in the UK that is larger even than that in other countries.
It's clear that a site like the IWF would need to be based in Britain, given the [[batshit crazy|hysteria]] surrounding online content stirred up by [[tabloid]]s in the UK that is larger even than that in other countries.


{{Quote|so who watches the Internet Watch Foundation and their fascist practices?
{{Quote|[[Watchmen|so who watches the Internet Watch Foundation]] and their fascist practices?


i'll put a $500 bet down right now that some senior members of Internet Watch Foundation are in fact pedos.
i'll put a $500 bet down right now that some senior members of Internet Watch Foundation are in fact pedos.
Line 20: Line 20:
|The IWF's anti-racism [http://www.iwf.org.uk/documents/20041020_racially_inflammatory_material_on_the_internet.pdf guidelines].}}
|The IWF's anti-racism [http://www.iwf.org.uk/documents/20041020_racially_inflammatory_material_on_the_internet.pdf guidelines].}}


==[[communism|McCarthyism]]==
== [[Communism|McCarthyism]] ==
[[Image:Politics of fear.gif|thumb|left|Reject the politics of fear.]]<br/>
 
[[Image:Politics of fear.gif|thumb|left|Reject the politics of fear.]]
 
[[Some argue]] that the IWF is an organisation set up by [[Tony Blair|New Labour]] to scare the populace into not exercising their rights to freedom of speech online. Pedophilia, racism and terrorism are bad things. Few people dispute that. But who's gonna say that they're not going to block access to websites containing material which might allow people to think for themselves outside the mass media? After all, these epithets are ones that people are scared of - like being called a witch in 17th century New England, or being called a [[communist]] in 1950s [[America]]. Historically, these labels have been attached to people who they don't apply to at all, and the fear is that it may be happening again. The [[UK]] seems to be going down the same path as [[Australia]], and the internet'll just be like cable [[TV]] by the time they're finished with it.
[[Some argue]] that the IWF is an organisation set up by [[Tony Blair|New Labour]] to scare the populace into not exercising their rights to freedom of speech online. Pedophilia, racism and terrorism are bad things. Few people dispute that. But who's gonna say that they're not going to block access to websites containing material which might allow people to think for themselves outside the mass media? After all, these epithets are ones that people are scared of - like being called a witch in 17th century New England, or being called a [[communist]] in 1950s [[America]]. Historically, these labels have been attached to people who they don't apply to at all, and the fear is that it may be happening again. The [[UK]] seems to be going down the same path as [[Australia]], and the internet'll just be like cable [[TV]] by the time they're finished with it.


Line 28: Line 30:
Thankfully, there are organisations like [http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/ Liberty] in Britain who support a sensible and rational approach, rather than the 'burn it, kill it, rip it up' which is like the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate Two Minutes Hate], again in Orwell's 1984. The IWF really should tackle the root of the problem, rather than use fear tactics against people who are not criminals. For example, even searching for [[BBW]] porn may generate one of their messages in Google [http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=%22delicious+on+demand%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi]. Makes no sense at all.
Thankfully, there are organisations like [http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/ Liberty] in Britain who support a sensible and rational approach, rather than the 'burn it, kill it, rip it up' which is like the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate Two Minutes Hate], again in Orwell's 1984. The IWF really should tackle the root of the problem, rather than use fear tactics against people who are not criminals. For example, even searching for [[BBW]] porn may generate one of their messages in Google [http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=%22delicious+on+demand%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi]. Makes no sense at all.


==The English-Wikipedian Holocaust==
== The English-Wikipedian Holocaust ==
[[Image:VirginKiller.jpg|thumb|[[Virgin Killer|This CP]] is now [[Internet Watch Foundation|IWF]] approved and [[FBI]] approved: [[Fap]] away]]
 
[[Image:VirginKiller.jpg|thumb|[[Virgin Killer|This CP]] is now [[Internet Watch Foundation|IWF]] and [[FBI]] approved: [[fap]] away]]
 
With good intentions, [[Wikipedian]]s started an "Academic" Child Porn portal to educate people on the historical controversy. With good intentions, the [[Internet Watch Foundation]] decided to blacklist English Wikipedia over the [[Virgin Killer]] article to prevent the English from [[lie|accidentally]] viewing "potentially illegal" content. With good intentions, the British ISP placed 95% of England in a cleanfeed (TM) [[The Holocaust|Concentration camp]] with only 8 transparent [[proxies]]. With good intentions, WikiMedia implemented [[Final Solution]] after detecting [[vandalism]] to prevent those 8 proxies from further edits. As a result, much [[lulz]] is generated from the over generosity of good intentions.
With good intentions, [[Wikipedian]]s started an "Academic" Child Porn portal to educate people on the historical controversy. With good intentions, the [[Internet Watch Foundation]] decided to blacklist English Wikipedia over the [[Virgin Killer]] article to prevent the English from [[lie|accidentally]] viewing "potentially illegal" content. With good intentions, the British ISP placed 95% of England in a cleanfeed (TM) [[The Holocaust|Concentration camp]] with only 8 transparent [[proxies]]. With good intentions, WikiMedia implemented [[Final Solution]] after detecting [[vandalism]] to prevent those 8 proxies from further edits. As a result, much [[lulz]] is generated from the over generosity of good intentions.


== External links ==
* [http://www.iwf.org.uk CLICK HERE REPORT ILLEGAL CONTENT]
* [mailto:[email protected] Email the chief exec] at his personal address [mailto:[email protected] [email protected]]. Don't send anything offensive though!


==External link==
*[http://www.iwf.org.uk CLICK HERE REPORT ILLEGAL CONTENT]
*[mailto:[email protected] Email the chief exec] at his personal address [mailto:[email protected] [email protected]]. Don't send anything offensive though!


{{Pedoseries}}
{{Pedoseries}}
[[Category:Sites]]
{{Sites}}

Latest revision as of 19:34, 30 August 2015

CLICK HERE REPORT ILLEGAL CONTENT
KILL IT WITH FIRE
The IWF considers this image to be illegal.
It removes things from Google searches.

The Internet Watch Foundation is a UK-based organisation which does exactly what it says on the tin - watches the Internet. More precisely, it watches out for various types of illegal content - most prominently CP, but it also won't tolerate racist material or terrorist websites. This is all very much understandable in itself, but some argue that they are using their powers to scare people out of being able to exercise their right to freedom of speech online.

The IWF were also famous for blocking access to /b/ in summer 2006. A 4chanarchive thread records the surrounding drama, and this was what led /b/ to conclude the real motivations of the IWF staff, one of whom received emails from Richard C. Mongler, inquiring as to what was going on.

It's clear that a site like the IWF would need to be based in Britain, given the hysteria surrounding online content stirred up by tabloids in the UK that is larger even than that in other countries.

   
 
so who watches the Internet Watch Foundation and their fascist practices?

i'll put a $500 bet down right now that some senior members of Internet Watch Foundation are in fact pedos.
 


 
 

Anonymous

The IWF is also extremely concerned when it encounters racism. For example, this is illegal content if hosted in the police state known as the UK:

   
 
Hi i´m a 18 year old boy from Denmark i just whant to tell, you one thing, FUCK YOU, what is your problem, are you are jude, or a negger, it´s true what the other gentlemen on your hate mail is saying neggers and judes are taken over, manly neggers around my country, we here in denmark have the same problem whit muslims, you know what that, they come here to destroy our faith in our father god, and his son, and the holly ghost, i say BURN THE MUSLIMS AND ALL OTHER NONE WHITE PROTESTANTS. HEIL HITLER. PS. the klan ku klux klan) is okay to.


 


 
 

—The IWF's anti-racism guidelines.

McCarthyism

Reject the politics of fear.

Some argue that the IWF is an organisation set up by New Labour to scare the populace into not exercising their rights to freedom of speech online. Pedophilia, racism and terrorism are bad things. Few people dispute that. But who's gonna say that they're not going to block access to websites containing material which might allow people to think for themselves outside the mass media? After all, these epithets are ones that people are scared of - like being called a witch in 17th century New England, or being called a communist in 1950s America. Historically, these labels have been attached to people who they don't apply to at all, and the fear is that it may be happening again. The UK seems to be going down the same path as Australia, and the internet'll just be like cable TV by the time they're finished with it.

Indeed, a British man recently was convicted for criminally obscene content for writing a story about the rape and murder of the band Girls Aloud, thanks to the IWF's efforts. Sure, the story was in poor taste. But it was a work of fiction. Using the same law that led to the banning of the book Lady Chatterley's Lover back 50 years ago, he is currently being prosecuted. This would never have happened ten years ago. In the Web 2.0 age, it's much easier to publish a document - you can write something crazy in a bad mood or weird state of mind without doing so much as to have to say a single word or leave your chair. Isn't this just like George Orwell's 1984 where the 'telescreen' can monitor your thoughts better than anything else can? Didn't this man deserve mental help instead of prosecution? Again, no satisfactory answers have been given.

Thankfully, there are organisations like Liberty in Britain who support a sensible and rational approach, rather than the 'burn it, kill it, rip it up' which is like the Two Minutes Hate, again in Orwell's 1984. The IWF really should tackle the root of the problem, rather than use fear tactics against people who are not criminals. For example, even searching for BBW porn may generate one of their messages in Google [1]. Makes no sense at all.

The English-Wikipedian Holocaust

This CP is now IWF and FBI approved: fap away

With good intentions, Wikipedians started an "Academic" Child Porn portal to educate people on the historical controversy. With good intentions, the Internet Watch Foundation decided to blacklist English Wikipedia over the Virgin Killer article to prevent the English from accidentally viewing "potentially illegal" content. With good intentions, the British ISP placed 95% of England in a cleanfeed (TM) Concentration camp with only 8 transparent proxies. With good intentions, WikiMedia implemented Final Solution after detecting vandalism to prevent those 8 proxies from further edits. As a result, much lulz is generated from the over generosity of good intentions.

External links


Internet Watch Foundation is part of a series on
UnV& Pedophiles [-+]

Aaron WilliamsAdam LanzaAlenonimoAlison RappAmber ButtrumAndy MaherAngryjediAnimatedJamesBeefraveBikerfoxBill CosbyBritbongCamHeadCasey AnthonyChaosscizzorsColonel McBadassComicalityCyraxxCyril SmithDan SchneiderDoomentioDr DisRespectDreamDrossRotzankDaddyOFiveDahvie VanityDangermanDeekerDidaskalosDynacatlovesmeEric RidenourErik MöllerFergie OliverFrank BonafedeGreg MazujianGreville JannerG-ZayGeosheaGalaxyRailways2199Harrison DigfootHumonHypnoHunter MooreIrish282Isabella Loretta JankeJames Terry Mitchell JrJaSonicJerry Peetjervaise brooke hamsterJimmy SavileJoey NigroJohn Patrick RogersJoseph KonyJustin BerryJustin DabrowKaitlyn HuntKatherine MarionKyle PerkinsLena DunhamLeonard F. Shaner Jr.LittleCloudLtFlaggerLogansperman2Lucian HodobocM. ChaosMagicrichMandoPonyMar9122Michael JacksonMikevirusMatrooko11MZMcBrideNathanrNeil FoxOmegaloreOnideus Mad HatterOnisionPaul WalkerPennywisePurple AkiPutridRalph SquillaceRiverman72Roger SampsonSam DeathWalkerSam RassenfossSarah ButtsShane LeeSibeScientologySethistoSmartschoolboy9Sophie LabelleTheAmazingAtheistThomas Watt HamiltonTimboxTrap-kunTyciolUncle GrandpaUpdownmostlyViolentacrezVonHeltonWoody AllenW. T. SnacksYandereDevYoung Tubers UnitedYtaskZeitgueist

Related Topics [-+]

Internet Watch Foundation is part of a series on

Sites

Visit the Sites Portal for complete coverage.