- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Reception wikis
This article is not crap. You can help by not doing anything.
|
Reception wikis looks like it was written by pseudo-intellectual 13-year-old boys. Look out for unfunny Uncyclopedia bullshit, boring in-jokes, and angsty teen-ery. You could also add in actual humor.
|
|
Fact Cat says: Every article on these wikis are just as shitty as this |
Reception Wikis are a bunch of pointless wikis were either fangirls talk about how IT'S SO GREAT AND AMAZING SOMETHING IS!, or were angry 13-year-old boys doomed failures by their parents can rant about how IT FUCKING SUCKS, AND I HATE IT SO MUCH!
These wikis are full of overly dramatic losers, SJWs and Anti-SJWs who talk about why something is great because it's PC AND FITS MY VALUES! and why something sucks because it's IT'S FUCKING OFFENSIVE BECAUSE I'M A SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE.
Making an article on these wikis requires no effort, you list reasons without adding any detail and say the stupidest shit imaginable. Meanwhile if typed something like this on the Encyclopedia Dramatica. Your article will be immediately be put in the Plumbing Log and you will become a Banned user.
How to create a Reception Wiki article
Just about anyone can make an article on these wikis, here's an example of every article.
Why It Rocks
- They're nice
- Their PC
- They're my friend
- Their a good person
- They call out bad
- They did good stuff
- They're sexy
Why It Sucks
- Their mean
- Anti PC
- They hate me
- Their a bad person
- Their racist, sexist, and homophobic
- They said terrible things
- They're ugly
- They have a massive hate boner
Are these wikis accurate?
No, they aren't. Despite them trying to call themselves "serious", nobody can take them seriously when all the articles look like they were made in fucking two seconds with no effort at all.
The wikis aren't even accurate to the reception. It's actually based on "If it's actually good or sucks" basically the biased opinions of people on the website. They're basically like a huge echo chamber. When critics have a different opinion they usually just say "the critics suck and only are dumbass opinion matters", while it is a fact that critics are shit, your opinions aren't much better and hold the same value as theirs.
Since these wikis are written by 13-year-old boys the only explanations are nonsensical. Some of the reasons are just your average shit written in the worst way possible, while others are just some shit pulled right from their ass and doesn't mean shit just to make the page longer. Some reasons are just getting offended over stupid shit that doesn't matter.
The people that run these wikis claim to be against SJW's if that was was, true why the fuck does everyone your websites act like one. They have the same traits and reasonings as SJW's when it comes to the articles. You can't even swear on any of pages, nobody gives a fuck about swearing and if you do, your some overly offended fuck, oh wait that's the users of these wikis.
The Wikis
- Best and Terrible TV Shows Wiki: Enterbot paradise. People have the exact same opinions as MysteriousMrEnter with no difference what so ever. The pages have the exact same quality as his reviews. Just a bunch praises or nitpicks with as little effort as possible. Basically a glorified script.
- Greatest and Awful Movies Wiki: Enterbot paradise. People have the exact same opinions as MysteriousMrEnter with no difference what so ever. The pages have the exact same quality as his reviews. Just a bunch praises or nitpicks with as little effort as possible. Basically a glorified script.
- Amazing and Atrocious YouTubers Wikis: Where people go to either show why their favorite nobody on Youtube that no one cares about rocks, despite the fact nobody even watches them or were they rage over a nobody they go super pissy over for no reason. Most of the reasons for this website make little sense at all.
- Best and Horrible Music and Songs Wikis: Unlike the other wikis which have no effort put into an article. These wikis have anti effort put into an article. Most people are too lazy to even write a full sentence or even have many reasons. They get mad over everything they see, in a song unless it was completely great from their perspective. They also dicksuck the shit out of Micheal Jackson, cause they can't accept the groomed children.
- Awesome and Crappy Games Wikis: Gamers praising games because they anyone can beat them are there an inexperienced player who can't play worth shit in a Call of Duty match to be shouted at by some 13-year-old boy on Xbox Live, or angry gamers raging over how they can't get past the first level because they suck at video games and think that it's harder than Dark Souls.
- Perfect and Atrocious Roblox Games Wikis: 13-year-old boys praising games. or getting raged that they don't get Roblox pussy and they got scammed.
- Fresh and Rotten Websites: Truly rotten.
- Healthy and
ToxicFandoms & Hatedoms: There is no such thing as a "healthy" fandom or hatedom.
- Incredible and Unfavorable Wikis and Users: Proves that they have massive egos and are full of themselves.
Everything else either got PWNed or is just completely udder shit.
Why It Sucks
- They are all the fucking same. With the same nitpick points, which they took to seriously. You see we can explain why the wikis suck in one fucking point, unlike your dragged out bullshit.
Their shitty attack article on us
Rotten Websites decided to make a shitty attack article that can be summarized as
1. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
2. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
3. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
4. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
5. Faildox
6. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
7. Failure
8. OH NO NSFW
9. Epic troll
10. Banned user
11. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
12. OH NO NSFW
13. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
14. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
15. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
16. Banned user
17. Clicked on the ad by mistake
18. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
19. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
20. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
21. Banned user
22. No, it's Wikipedia with more lulz
23. ED IS SATIRICAL DUMBASS
24. That's because of enemies of the lulz get super pissed.
See Also
- Wikipedia - Has little resemblance despite calling themselves wikis
- Uncyclopedia - Another shitty website
- Rational Wiki - They even thought this was offensive, despite similar views they won't admit
- Conservapedia - See above
- The Outcast Network - A bunch of losers that split from these wikis, even though they're the same
