- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Bad Webcomics Wiki: Difference between revisions
imported>Smith |
imported>Smith |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===For good or decent webcomics that don't fit your tastes=== | ===For good or decent webcomics that don't fit your tastes=== | ||
#the same thing, but harping about whatever it is that you instantly dislike something for | #the same thing, but harping about whatever it is that you instantly dislike something for | ||
#make sure to mask your real reason for writing the article | #make sure to mask your real reason for writing the article by bitching about other things [[nobody cares]] about | ||
==The high standards of this [[shit|quality]] wiki== | ==The high standards of this [[shit|quality]] wiki== | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 9 April 2018
 |
Bad Webcomics Wiki is a Bad New Article. You can help by fixing it. |  |
Bad Webcomics Wiki is Oddguy's half-assed attempt at chronicling webcomics made by spergs even bigger than himself. Hosting articles that would fit right in on tvtropes, nobody has ever had a reason to dredge up this shit stain on the internet.
Why it sucks
Despite being written by mostly the same people that ED is, the Bad Webcomics Wiki has none of its semblance of self-awareness; instead of trying to be funny, editors there posture as critics even though they couldn't write a good webcomic, or anything original, to save their lives.
While some of the shit they review contains Furfaggotry, regular faggotry, sick fuckery, and or other lulzy subjects, a massive amount of space is wasted on mediocre, bottom of the barrel trash that you have to wade through to get to something worth reading about.
They also ape ED by mocking the people who complain about their reviews and mercilessly trying to get their attention rather than doing something productive.
However, like real critics who don't live in a sub-terrain cave, they still want to be taken seriously.
How to write for Bad Webcomics Wiki
- Take any webcomic off of the net
- Pick something even a downsie toddler would notice
- Spend 99% of the article talking about that one thing
- Pretend that you're better than the subject of the article
- ????
- Cry yourself to sleep
For good or decent webcomics that don't fit your tastes
- the same thing, but harping about whatever it is that you instantly dislike something for
- make sure to mask your real reason for writing the article by bitching about other things nobody cares about
The high standards of this quality wiki
- Will accept neo-nazi members who threaten to shoot up schools
- All artists with even a vaguely anime-esque style are weeaboos that needs to be emphasized as much as possible. This is an important part of our astute critical analysis
- Remember to target minors as much as possible. Their tears are extra salty.
Oddguy
The Bad Webcomics Wiki, like his, "analysis", channel, is yet another reminder that Oddguy is a talent-less hack who is too much of a pussy to even take himself seriously. That's the best way to avoid acknowledging your inadequacies after all.
own thread
|
Bad Webcomics Wiki is a Bad New Article. You can help by fixing it. | |