- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Inciclopedia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Likeicare was this directly translated or something? seeking further assistance from someone familiar with wiki in question |
No edit summary |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Spics}} | ||
[[Image:Inciclopedia.png|center|This is their logo, everyone can edit it! Just like ED.]] | [[Image:Inciclopedia.png|center|This is their logo, everyone can edit it! Just like ED.]] | ||
[[Image:tio1.jpg|thumb|[[wut|Their version of a meme. This guy appears in 99% of sysops very very very... shitty articles. It must be a any sysop from there familiar, because nobody knows who is until now and they are too stupid to find someone like that...]]]] | [[Image:tio1.jpg|thumb|[[wut|Their version of a meme. This guy appears in 99% of sysops very very very... shitty articles. It must be a any sysop from there familiar, because nobody knows who is until now and they are too stupid to find someone like that...]]]] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
[[Image:Inciclopedia notable pic.jpg|thumb|200px|This is one of Inciclopedia's notable pictures. I didn't smile either.]] | [[Image:Inciclopedia notable pic.jpg|thumb|200px|This is one of Inciclopedia's notable pictures. I didn't smile either.]] | ||
'''Inciclopedia''' is | '''Inciclopedia''' is the Spanish language version of [[Uncyclopedia]]. It is a complete and utter [[failure]] of a site, because Spanish is only spoken by [[You|faggots and mexiniggers]]. | ||
Since the articles are so damn long, they will undoubtedly bore you to death. In fact, the sysops encourage you to write relentlessly | Since the articles are so damn long, they will undoubtedly bore you to death. In fact, the faggot sysops encourage you to write relentlessly. You may create the most perfect article, so to speak, but the sysops will always bring invented pretexts hinting at standards, so it'll be [[Criteria for Speedy Deletion|immediately assraped]]. | ||
Actually, Inciclopedia is so boring it doesn't inspire you to vandalize it. | Actually, Inciclopedia is so boring it doesn't inspire you to vandalize it. The content kills any stimulation of the mind or emotions. Only the [[Dramacrat|truly depraved]] or the [[13-year-old boy|jobless]] would do it. So go for it and [[profit]]. | ||
At some point in 2008, Inciclopedia was in a net-war with Wikipediars, a kind of ED humor-styled Wikipedia from [[Chile]]. They hate each other but they are both crap. No one cared, obviously. | At some point in 2008, Inciclopedia was in a net-war with Wikipediars, a kind of ED humor-styled Wikipedia from [[Chile]]. They hate each other but they are both crap. No one cared, obviously. | ||
==Magnificent | ==Magnificent features== | ||
* Jokes that only a [[gay]] would understood on every article. | * Jokes that only a [[gay]] would understood on every article. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 57: | ||
== Who created this [[crap]]?? == | == Who created this [[crap]]?? == | ||
Inciclopedia is the epitome of [[unfunny]], just like | Inciclopedia is the epitome of [[unfunny]], just like its english counterpart, Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically [[shitty]]. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like [[fail|"This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..."]] When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be [[fapping|doing something more constructive]]. | ||
But the [[Completely irrelevant history|big question remains]]: Who created Inciclopedia? | But the [[Completely irrelevant history|big question remains]]: Who created Inciclopedia? | ||
* Maybe a Spic [[/b/]] user, trying to imitate [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] and failing? <br/> | * Maybe a Spic [[B|/b/]] user, trying to imitate [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] and failing? <br/> | ||
* Maybe an [[emo]] fag? <br/> | * Maybe an [[emo]] fag? <br/> | ||
* [[Jimbo Wales|The | * [[Jimbo Wales|The Great Pornographer]]? | ||
* Some [[Angela Beesley|fugly chick]]? | * Some [[Angela Beesley|fugly chick]]? | ||
* [[You]]? | * [[You]]? | ||
| Line 94: | Line 93: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
<span class="blink" style="text-align:left;" style="color:red">'''DANGER'''</span> - Very high levels of [[mental retardation]]. Please, better see this: [ | <span class="blink" style="text-align:left;" style="color:red">'''DANGER'''</span> - Very, Very high levels of [[mental retardation]] as [[wikipedia]]ns like cat/XXBlackburnXx display. Please, better see this: [[:File:Hand in toilet bowl of shit.jpg|Content]] | ||
* [http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Portada Inciclopedia's Portada] | * [http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Portada Inciclopedia's Portada] | ||
* [http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/IN:O Terrorist Cast] (sysops) | * [http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/IN:O Terrorist Cast] (sysops) | ||
* [http://gamerfan.wordpress.com/category/inciclopedia/ An Inciclopedian's writings about his sexual obsession with the Inciclopedia] | * [http://gamerfan.wordpress.com/category/inciclopedia/ An Inciclopedian's writings about his sexual obsession with the Inciclopedia] | ||
* [https://inciclopedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica Inciclopedia's article about ED] | |||
{{wikis}} | {{wikis}} | ||
| Line 107: | Line 106: | ||
[[Category:Shock Sites]] | [[Category:Shock Sites]] | ||
[[Category:Lolcows]] | |||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 2 October 2024
|
|
WARNING:
With Spics,
|
Inciclopedia is the Spanish language version of Uncyclopedia. It is a complete and utter failure of a site, because Spanish is only spoken by faggots and mexiniggers.
Since the articles are so damn long, they will undoubtedly bore you to death. In fact, the faggot sysops encourage you to write relentlessly. You may create the most perfect article, so to speak, but the sysops will always bring invented pretexts hinting at standards, so it'll be immediately assraped.
Actually, Inciclopedia is so boring it doesn't inspire you to vandalize it. The content kills any stimulation of the mind or emotions. Only the truly depraved or the jobless would do it. So go for it and profit.
At some point in 2008, Inciclopedia was in a net-war with Wikipediars, a kind of ED humor-styled Wikipedia from Chile. They hate each other but they are both crap. No one cared, obviously.
Magnificent features
- Jokes that only a gay would understood on every article.
- Lack of visible talent in sysops' jokes on all articles.
- Shit that only sysops understand on all articles.
- Personal or nationalist vendettas by sysops (personal frustration retaliations) in all articles.
- Only-Spanish accent in all articles by sysops insistence-oppression.
- Unjustified pornography deficiency on all articles.
- Slavery to the users by the sysops.
- Red links on all articles.
- A significant ammount of other Uncyclopedias copypastas.
- All wiki sysops' personal censorship.
- Few importance by the sysops to the wiki in general; only they don't care to use the wiki as your personal manipulation machine, why avoid squabbling among themselves.
- Fear deficiency by the sysops.
- Personal importance auto-increase by the sysops.
- Sysops' lack of money (screenshots of your Windows' Desktops their illegal copies of operating systems).
- Hawks to serve the sysops in [es.wikia.com es.wikia.com] (supposed wikia.com Spanish language version).
- Personal attacks to the readers on all articles.
- Sysops hatred to the simple use of strikethrough text with
<s>or<del>or to simple lists (like this).
- All unique funny content comes from new users who never become sysops.
- Older editions disappearance in Revision histories.
Who created this crap??
Inciclopedia is the epitome of unfunny, just like its english counterpart, Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically shitty. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like "This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..." When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be doing something more constructive.
But the big question remains: Who created Inciclopedia?
- Maybe a Spic /b/ user, trying to imitate Encyclopedia Dramatica and failing?
- Maybe an emo fag?
- The Great Pornographer?
- Some fugly chick?
- You?
- Or maybe a Spic Jew? (see above)
Interestingly enough, everyone knows spics and niggers don't have internets.
See also
- Poop.mov
- Argentina
- Censorship
- Chile
- Delete fucking everything
- Fail
- Poverty - what cause your sysops
- Illogicopedia
- Meme
- Mexico
- Retard
- Rulesfag
- Shit
- Poor
- Hack and Pastebin - they urgently need those sysops
- Spain
- Spics
- Terrorism
- Uncyclopedia
External links
DANGER - Very, Very high levels of mental retardation as wikipedians like cat/XXBlackburnXx display. Please, better see this: Content
- Inciclopedia's Portada
- Terrorist Cast (sysops)
- An Inciclopedian's writings about his sexual obsession with the Inciclopedia
- Inciclopedia's article about ED
[Edit]
Inciclopedia is a part of a series on Wikis
|
Inciclopedia is part of a series on Visit the Sites Portal for complete coverage. |
|
Inciclopedia is part of a series on Visit the Trolls Portal for complete coverage. |