Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off. Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
It would be nice to see more work by her Rule 34 stalker tards. It really illustrates the point of how creepy they are. SWfan 18:14, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
"Notice the only somewhat happy face." Wow, how scathing. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 18:17, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
Good point, I changed it to disgruntled. SWfan 18:56, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
You aren't very good at this. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 19:33, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
You're right. I could be a bit more bashful. It's just, I can't find anything wrong with her physical attributes, as opposed to her overall mental state. SWfan 19:38, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
I threw in a sentence or two in the middle of the 4chan paragraph about the ridiculous amount of cash this whole fiasco has made her. I don't know whether or not it belongs in that spot particularly, but I think it belongs somewhere. Barrabas 01:43, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
I just saw the edit. Love it! Gives great insight to the delusional minds of these b-tards. SWfan 08:52, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
Didn't have time yesterday, since I had to look up how to do it, but went ahead and added the GOTIS banner at the top today. Thanks for the vote of confidence, though Barrabas 22:37, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
Hey, it's becoming a great article! CrawlingPastaHellion 16:21, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
If this long-lipped bitch just got a good lickin' of some dickin', she wouldn't be such an uptight asshole. Scorch 21:36, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
In the interest of accuracy, her last name suggests she is Armenian, which further suggests two things: consulting an atlas reveals the former Soviet Armenia is significantly closer to Russia & the Ukraine than to Israel. As a matter of fact, I'll bet you could count the number of Jews in Armenia on one hand, and the likelihood of her being a Jew is pretty much nonexistent. Secondly, if she IS an Armenian (she is), they fall into an odd group with Georgia & Azerbijan - bordering Turkey, Iran, & Russia, but not sharing the same language or even alphabet. So, in effect, they are neither Arabs or Slavs, & get pissed if you suggest it. Therefore, referring to her as a "Jew" or a "sandnigger" are equally mistaken. Unless, of course, you are sold on rhetoric over accuracy, cheap trick over substance, mule over donkey (whichever can't reproduce - I can never recall). hellon_earth 11:30, 12 October 2012 (EDT)
Note: Goes to the umpteenth degree to prove she isn't a Jew, but can't google the word "mule" -Barrabas 01:11, 15 October 2012 (EDT)
There are a lot of similarities. The only thing missing is some kind of definite identifier like a beauty mark. Sadly, I don't think she has any. From the looks of it I am 90% this is her. Should I add it to the article? Also, why has this never been AOTN? oddguy 08:07, 5 August 2014 (EDT)
* Hold on...
Small round birthmark over he left breast matches. Looks like it's her. oddguy 08:21, 5 August 2014 (EDT)
It is her. If it isn't, it makes for good fucking drama. CobaltCat 08:25, 5 August 2014 (EDT)
Someone on reddit says it ain't her. Let's leave it alone till we can figure it out. oddguy 10:10, 5 August 2014 (EDT)
She just happens to really look like her at that angle.it definitely isn't her. The girl in the photoset has the same birthmark and could have the widows peak but has some kind of combover. --Mantequilla(talk) 21:19, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
Yeah, I know it ain't her but Cobalt thought we should keep it and I wasn't in the mood to argue. oddguy 23:34, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
eh ya i guess it still can cause butthurt. --Mantequilla(talk) 21:40, 27 August 2014 (EDT)
This is more or less a reminder to myself that this page could be trimmed or put into subpages. CobaltCat 02:23, 12 September 2014 (EDT)
==Nudes surface==
[[File:Naked Anita.jpg|thumb|[[Feminist Frequency#Nudes surface|Some suggest this is a different slut]]]]
Recently a picture surfaced of Anita or someone looking like her, ie. Anita, where she was being a perfect role-model for all feminists and woman in general. I.e: on her knees,smiling gleefully with a load of cum drizzled all over her face. The only thing she saw missing was a sandwich in her hands.
[[File:Naked Anita.jpg|center]]
<center>'''[[Kelly Martin Broderick|This is what feminists look like]]'''</center>
[[File:Anita Proof.jpg|thumb|right|200px|List of evidence verifying identity]]
Not only does this picture prove what everyone has suspected all along: that Anita is just cum dumpster and despite her "I'm a strong woman" act online, in reality she's actually her man's little bitch who does whatever he says and doesn't forget to add "thank you", but you can also see that she has tiny tits with areolas the size of dinner plates and that without the 5 layers of make-up she wears in her videos (and one transparent layer of jizz instead) she's even more ugly than anyone could have imagined.
'''<u>Score:</u>''' 3/10 - Would not fap.
===It ain't her===
Some retards are quick to spring to the defense of this cumslut by pointing out that it [http://www.realteengirls.org/?p=21543 is a different girl], but given how we know Anita altered her past many times, it would be wise to take it with as much salt as Anita takes cum on her ugly face. A better argument for it not being her is that she has never experienced the dick, which would explain why she is so angry in her videos.
Nude section being kept here for now. oddguy 10:28, 12 September 2014 (EDT)
Angry Bits
There's quite a few parts of this article that read like they were written by someone with the most ass enraged butt hurt imaginable. Problem is it actually really does make her look like a victim when it's written with such screaming insults and outright verbal attacks. I think a more condescendingly sarcastic tone would be better overall but that's just me. --U Mad Bro 09:08, 5 January 2015 (EST)
I'm fixing everything I can right now. oddguy 09:53, 5 January 2015 (EST)
I fixed this entir article, don't fuck it up again.
This article was a pile of fucking shit. Here is what you should avoid doing to keep it from becoming shit again:
There is no need to add a new section or sub section for every fucking word that she says. Unless it's really important, add it in the text of a pre-existing section. If you can't, keep it out.
There is no need to make a new section for every fucking video she makes. No one wants to read your one-sided argument with her about why what she said is wrong. If you want your opinion heard so much make a fucking youtube video and I promise you no one will watch that too.
If you MUST make a new section check if it's related to one of the other major topics and add it at a sub-section there.
There is no need for ANY more videos. I don't care if you think that "OMG this guy totally owns her bro!". No one cares. Unless the video uncovers some new information about her it isn't important.
Use your fucking words. Don't stick giant pictures at the center of the article.
If you MUST stick a giant fucking picture at the center of the article at least crop out the part that is important. She tweeted something? Fine. I don't need to read the comments.
Also, reduce it's size.
You got 10 pictures to add? Make a gallery or a photoframe.
And if you're going to stick a giant picture in the middle of this shit anyway then don't supplement it with three paragraphs of your unfunny opinions about it and explanations of what we see in the picture and why it's funny. Let it speak for itself.
No one cares if you figured out some cool new way to arrange picture. It takes up too much space. Put the pictures in a gallery or don't put them in the article at all.
Nobody wants to read her random tweets. They aren't interesting enough to take up space on the sides of the article. Use that space for shit that's actually funny and makes the article look good.
There is no need to add new sections for any of the following: That one offensive things she said that one time and no one cared about, that one minor mistake she made once and you can totally prove her wrong, that one-sided slapfight she had with some nobody that no one cares about or anything else that is minor and unimportant.
This article is too long anyway and you aren't funny. No one wants to read a paragraph of your opinions of her or of your over-analyzing something she said. This article is already huge so there is no need to pad it out with a whole bunch of nothing. Save room for real drama only.
Keep it color coded. Stop adding new frames to things, each in it's own color. There is no need to be a special snowflake.
Take your butthurt home with you. I know a bunch of losers are really mad at her and they come over here to edit this article. Drink a fucking glass of warm milk or something. Calling her a bitch or a cunt is funny once or twice. Having it twice in every line of text is not and whoever wrote it like that in the first place is fucking pathetic.
Why the hell are you arguing with her opinions at all anymore!? We all already know she's a scam artist. What point is there to writing about how she got something about feminism or about a video game wrong?
Anita Sarkeesian obsessed losers are never cool and we should always make fun of them.
If you added something to the article and it turns out to be not true just delete it. If you're about to add something to the article which is obviously not true ("Anita made a joke that's against the law!") then just don't.
finally - just don't touch anything and that's it.
What happened with this article was that there were too many cooks in the kitchen and every time something minor happened that seemed important at the time someone would rush in to make a new section about it with no concern for the overall look of the article. They also couldn't be asked to come back and delete it once it turned out to be a bunch of unimportant/untrue bullshit. In short - everyone editing this article try not to fuck it up again and if you see someone doing it tell them to fuck off because this thing will otherwise become unreadable again. oddguy 15:30, 5 January 2015 (EST)
The devs of Towerfall Ascension are kissing up to the her hard by making her a new playable character. All is lost.
The reactions from /Gamergate/ and /v/, holy shit it's glorious.
Sauce lol. --LoverOfBats 17:30, 10 February 2015 (EST)
Maybe I would give a shit if the game wasn't pixel graphics trash.
CobaltCat 04:33, 27 June 2014 (EDT)
oddguy 
CobaltCat 08:25, 5 August 2014 (EDT)
09:42, 6 August 2014 (EDT)
CobaltCat 01:17, 11 February 2015 (EST)
