Talk:Donald Drumpf

Judging from the first paragraph of this article he clearly did not win with the less than well educated (who he loves anyway, much like Jesus) --Neurogeezer 12:06, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Someone seems a bit salty. CobaltCat 12:43, 1 March 2016 (EST)

shitty attack article should be deleted ^reply 12:45, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Or improved :^). The original Donald Trump article was downright schizophrenic. One paragraph praising him as the god king of man, only for the next to say he is shit. CobaltCat 12:57, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Both should be improved: perhaps one article could serve to describe Businessman and whorehouse entrepreneur Donald Drumpf (isn't slightly altering your grandpa's German surname as American as apfel pie?) and the other to shamelessly exalt the virtues of the President that will bring Christmas back to America --Neurogeezer 13:51, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Well, that's what they more or less do at the moment. Drumpf is for shit talking, The Donald is for dick sucking. They both need to have more of both. CobaltCat 14:01, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Yes, in fact good job separating the light from the darkness into two articles. Historically that is very presidential. --Neurogeezer 14:16, 1 March 2016 (EST)

grow some balls disregard that I suck cock

[ORIGINAL STATEMENT RETRACTED; Didn't read the rest of the talkpages].--Ezstick76 19:31, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Illiterate BTFO. (talk) 05:03, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Despite wanting to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, I am pleased that ED has remained true to its heritage as an equal opportunity offender. Cheers, --Jawsuswalks 17:00, 6 March 2016 (EST)

You are aware of our pro trump article right? (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2016 (EST)

Of course. --Jawsuswalks 19:32, 8 March 2016 (EST)

Lawsuits

Just a small reminder of lawsuits he has settled or lost

http://www.scribd.com/doc/300193678/1997-Jill-Harth-Lawsuit#fullscreen
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/03/the-lawsuits-of-donald-trump/273819/
http://fortune.com/2015/08/14/donald-trump-lawsuits/

CobaltCat 07:25, 7 March 2016 (EST)

Keeping up with the Trumps

I don't think common currency attacks succeed in poking fun at Trump. It's not that he doesn't offer material (Incessant repetition and shameless pandering, incest so cash, etc) so why try to squeeze a sub-Family Guyesque laugh with blatantly idiotic allegations such as the whole "lifestyle" paragraph? It's not effective. In my universe his lifestyle description would focus on his Hitler-like alcohol&Tobacco avoidance and Hitler-like lust for his hot daughter (instead of niece). The "key" to Trump's candidacy is that somewhat ironically he portrays America as an international victim and proposes pandering bullshit that, if enacted, would in fact make America "more like everywhere else". I want to dispel this notion that Trump actually believes what he says to get votes in South Carolina, he knows exactly what to say to get the votes, but his platform outlines the settling of America's gargantuan debt (one until now leveraged by military might), hence the Telangpu Khan forced meme. --Neurogeezer 19:24, 20 March 2016 (EDT)

in a nutshell

Trump has been using red state rhetoric during the primaries to mask his centrist common-sense platform from idiotic Republicans, because in fact "he is not a true conservative". For every defense of Planned Parenthood and every attack on Extremist Free Trade he has to pay with a couple of "GTFO"s. He's survived the Republican Primaries while equating Christianity with Christmas in a cup in order to appear as a somewhat common-sense-agnostic when it comes to seducing retarded Democrats. The material for potential LULZ is there and it's about code-switching and trolling more than it is about another old dirty right wing politician.

i.e. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/wow-video-black-trump-supporter-stomps-anti-trump-protester-in-tucson/

--Neurogeezer 19:36, 20 March 2016 (EDT)

Wait...what?

What the hell is this?

Look, I get the Trump is divisive, but having two articles for the same person is fucking retarded. IMO, all the stuff on this page should be merged with the original Trump page, perhaps under its own heading ('A Liberal's Perspective', or something like that).

I mean, seriously! Not even Hitler gets two articles! -Argonz 04:06, 24 June 2016 (EDT)

OK CobaltCat 04:55, 24 June 2016 (EDT)

Sigh...fair enough. Precedent has been set. Stupid and illogical precedent, but precedent nonetheless.- Argonz 14:52, 24 June 2016 (EDT)

Spice this article up

Well im working on getting this article spiced up and in order, I'm familiar with his campaign fuckups but not so much familiar with his fuck ups as a business man. - Majortom115 23:16, 24 March 2017 (PDT)

Templates

There's way too many templates at the top and bottom of the page. Clean it up. Also, remember that this page is only for anti-trump nonsense, so move any pro-trump shit to the other page - (Al Gore) 09:43, 3 April 2017 (EDT)

Slight Improvement

I put a small dent in the bloat by adding in a couple collapsible galleries and a couple of image/video slide shows. I also split the massive gallery apart into sub-galleries. It still needs a LOT of work though, there's WAY too much bloat. Some stuff should be moved into the galleries and other stuff should be put into image/video slide shows. --PondCat 23:35, 3 April 2017 (EDT)

Cleanup

Can someone help me clean up User:Majortom115's spergout ? - (Al Gore) 21:42, 24 April 2017 (EDT)

No. CobaltCat 01:18, 25 April 2017 (EDT)