Encyclopedia Dramatica:Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/25

Trolling - God Tier Level!

I thought about making it even ~more~ realistic sounding and using ~actual~ spoilers...but then I thought...mmmm...probably we have enough death threats thrown at ED as it is. ;)

Feel free to improve/enhance the image if you like (or replace with something as equally lulzy). There's probably a special place in hell for you though if you actually post the ~real~ leaked spoilers/video. --Onideus 18:05, 16 May 2013 (EDT)

I'm waiting for the butthurt and drama that will come with Matt Smith leaving after the Christmas special. ^{^{Are you butthurt?}} _{BAWWW here.} 15:48, 8 June 2013 (EDT)

Interwiki

Several users from other wikis inspired by ED have proposed interwiki with ED. Both sites link to the equivalent ED article for their articles with interwiki, and it seems like a good idea to link back to them... Maybe not just interwik with lurkmore.to, and dramatica.org.ua, maybe even UD definitions, partyvan wiki, Nigrapedia and KYM(they link to ED articles as add. resources in many of theirs)

Although there would definitely a couple sites that would definitely or likely be blacklisted from interwiki if done..)

What do others think about this idea? We'd have to bug and convince E and the other bureaucrats to install the interwiki mediawiki addon, though..-- Talk to me|Contribs 20:24, 24 May 2013 (EDT)

Yes, it would be great.--Курка Аалямб 23:35, 24 May 2013 (EDT)

i'm inclined to agree. include wikifur and (Free) Uncyclopedia too. -hipcrime

15:34, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Spam Accounts Are Getting Out Of Hand

Do we have some automated way of removing these...there's like...dozens upon dozens of them now, most of them are like sleeper accounts. The bot creates the account and then lets it sit for awhile and then randomly activates it at a later time to try and avoid detection. There's upwards of like ten accounts a day being shit out onto the site. They have the potential to do far more than just spam as well, they could in fact cause a significant amount of damage (if that's the intent of whoever is building them up). --Onideus 04:36, 27 May 2013 (EDT)

The old ED had a janitor bot to help filter this out. If anyone here is a good enough programmer to cobble one together, it would be helpful. In the meantime, I highly recommend Sweet Captcha. Wait, hold back the torches and pitchforks for a second. Click the link. It's Customizable and very effective against bots without being as annoying as the blurry words kind. If it's an army of Azns making accounts for pennies an account (yes, that happens now), manual means are the only real means to stop spam accounts.

Anyway, more ideas to help stop the spam accounts. Some are more paranoid than others....

Implement IP bans and MAC address bans on spam accounts. This should clean out chunks of accounts at a time.
Making people have to do some actual edits before being able to make a new article. Spam bots love crapping out new articles.
Turn off editing for suspected spam accounts. Let them appeal in the TJC or a special page if they want to edit.
Force people to come and say hi in the TJC or a welcome page before they can edit the rest of the site.
Have account cleanups every now and then. No edits = delete the accounts. A real user can always come back and make a new account, but, chances are, a real user has an edit history and wouldn't get hit.
The account cleanups could also hit people who only upload stuff (this is not instragram!) and people who only do minor edits as well. I've seen bots/spammers make uploads and minor edits to keep low profile.

Nothing's perfect, but hopefully these ideas give a start. --3tails 17:13, 27 May 2013 (EDT)

In regards to CAPTCHAs, Tor users will be unable to use CAPTCHAs because most of them browse for CP on the Tor network and disable JavaScript as it can reveal their IP address. User:Expo|Talk|Tools|Email||[3] 04:39, 29 May 2013 (EDT)

The TOR version of the site is read-only.--

Talk to me|Contribs 16:21, 2 June 2013 (EDT)

Just to illustrate how bad our bogus account flooding is, here's a "short" list of spam accounts created in the past 48 hours:

Secondary common form (regular name with random number sequence on end):
User_talk:Martin880‎ - Potential Real User
~~User_talk:Linwood50‎~~ - Raped
User_talk:Trena9344‎ - Potential Real User
~~User_talk:Andrew672‎~~ - Raped
~~User_talk:Suzanne70‎~~ - Raped

Third common form (regular name with random number/letter sequence, likely all caps)
User_talk:ShellaO55‎ - Potential Real User
User_talk:VonALQI‎ - Potential Real User

There's some other lesser used forms, but those are the main ones. And again, this is just the ones created in the past 48 hours! o_O

--Onideus 21:55, 31 May 2013 (EDT)

Could be an idea to abort them at birth until anything better comes along, idk... • Mr.Jonzz

20:58, 2 June 2013 (EDT)

Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/25 received an automatic death sentence.

The account Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/25 matches a profile identified by qualified Interwiki Protectional Experts and as such was swiftly sodomized for lulz & great justice.

Should Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/25 wish to contest this ban etc

Another potential solution is to setup a bot to automatically dump/block/ban any account that sits idle for say 30 days with no contributions. That would probably eliminate like 90% of this problem overall, since the majority are "sleeper accounts". --Onideus 16:22, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Pretty sure that zaiger said not to ban them unless/until they actually do spam.--

Talk to me|Contribs 16:45, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Yeah, you generally shouldn't. I'm doing it because I specifically know how/where to check. I did provide a basic link though for general checking:

http://www.stopforumspam.com

It's not going to pick up all of them, but it'll make it easier for those of us who know how to properly check. If you're not sure how to check properly or it doesn't come up on that link then you should most definitely *NOT* delete them.

--Onideus

16:54, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Bring back Space Moose

Space Moose is an ED tradition. Funny, geeky, and classic, he belongs on TJC. We have enough pages/articles/links with gay stuff. Space moose needs to stay, Mr Jonzz Fapping Material just doesn't have the same heart.

Could someone with admin rights please revert the last edit and bring back Space Moose? Thank you very much! --3tails 01:01, 29 May 2013 (EDT)

Fine.

05:44, 29 May 2013 (EDT)

Massive FaceBook Spam Flooding In Progress

Holy shit d00d... http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151490880823721

And that's just on a ~single~ Wired post/thread and just within the last hour! o_O

...kinda makes me wonder about our recent bot created account flooding issue (still yet to be dealt with I might add). --Onideus 21:00, 31 May 2013 (EDT)

CHECK UR PRIVILEGE NOW

http://checkprivilege.x10.mx/

-- Talk to me|Contribs 23:46, 1 June 2013 (EDT)

i scored a 310 ♥♥♥

00:10, 2 June 2013 (EDT)

-1505 ~O b l i q u e 01:23, 2 June 2013 (EDT)

-60. We should get all the underprivileged EDiots together to kidnap and ransom meepsheep. People pay attention and send money to rescue privileged people (even if they're just in a trailer playing vidya with us for a week). We'll get away with it because we're underprivileged. Best $10 each ever. --3tails 01:06, 4 June 2013 (EDT)

150. Agreed. User:Expo|Talk|Tools|Email|

|[4] 04:01, 4 June 2013 (EDT)

> EDiots together to kidnap and ransom meepsheep

This is beginning to sound like a porno.

04:35, 4 June 2013 (EDT)

I'm very good at using a camera and I won't say a fucking thing. Slackerdan 13:52, 5 June 2013 (EDT)

I scored a 160 while being very truthful about myself. LIATBuster30011 21:09, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

The Cancer That's Killing ED

We keep losing highly contributing members (like Gray) due to tweenage muppet fuck, 4Chan level trolling like this:

And even the highly contributing members who stick around wind up having to continually babysit this stupidity, which takes away from time they could have had to update and work on articles. For instance I ~had~ planned to upload another 200 images this morning, but now I've got to put that off so I can babysit, Dumbfuck.

I think the biggest problem is that we have too many kids acting like kids (who for some odd reason have admin and editor status) and not enough grown ups running the site, which is basically just running everything into the ground. --Onideus 09:01, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

lol all gray did was upload irrelevant porn, nobody cares about your nerd rage ♥♥♥

21:27, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

u mad? • Mr.Jonzz

09:18, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

If I was mad, I would have reconfigured one of my bots to run through EVERY contribution that Dumbfuck has ever made to the site and set it up to revert every...single...last...one...of...them. So no...I'm not mad. Dumbfucks generally don't make me angry, they just provide me with a convenient punching bag. ^__^

--Onideus

09:26, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

He's resorted to name calling. I like that. My edits were legitimate. As I said in the summary, I was removing everything Mary Sue. Now I was going to do more work on the article until you decided to use a bot to protect it. Had you actually given me time to work on it...

P.S. I AM REALLY SORRY THAT YOU DO NOT APPROVE OF THE ED ARTICLE THAT WAS WRITTEN ABOUT YOU!

09:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Which is why you tried removing large chunks of it, eh Dumbfuck?

--Onideus

09:31, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

"we have too many kids acting like kids" - they're kids, that's what kids do... although I often actively encourage kids to act like adults. • Mr.Jonzz

09:34, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

An example of a user removing LARGE CHUNKS of an article.

09:37, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

My bot is currently setup to revert any and all edits you try making to the article (since you've been trying to vandalize it). If you want something changed ask someone else (who isn't a dumbfuck) to do it for you. Or edit it in your user space (you already setup a copy so go fuck that up if you want to vandalize it so badly). --Onideus

09:46, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Could you at least ~this~ and *that* and ^__^ for us? And I know, you are now picking who can and can't edit an article that was written about you. I AM SO TERRIBLY SORRY MAN! NOW YOU GOT ME CRYING MYSELF TO SLEEP!

09:51, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

When I said 'someone who isn't a dumbfuck', what I meant was, 'anyone who isn't you'. Cause yer the only dumbfuck whose trying to vandalize it, Dumbfuck.

--Onideus

09:55, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

DUDE I AM SORRY I THAT DIDN'T MAKE ALL CHANGES IN A SINGLE EDIT. HOW ABOUT THAT OFFER TO SUCK YOUR DICK? AGAIN, I FEEL SO TERRIBLE.

10:02, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

LIATBuster30011 21:13, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

this thread is really gay, if you think complaining about a problem that isn't a problem will fix said not-existent problem, please kill yourself. Bitching instead of writing is the reason we're losing contributors. look in the mirror instead of pointing the finger. ~O b l i q u e 01:17, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Well you are partially right, simply complaining about the problem isn't going to fix it. However...TECHNOLOGY can fix the problem. *nods* There is something else which can "fix" this particular problem as well. I'm afraid that "Shnookums" has uh..."exposed" himself (rather stupidly) and I now know his real identity (as well as ~why~ he's so keen on editing my article with his MarySue bullshit art):

Whoops! :D

As such, I now know who target ~directly~ in order to "solve" this particular "problem". ^__^

--Onideus

02:03, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Summary of this thread: RAGERAGERAGE GB2NIGGERTITS User:Expo|Talk|Tools|Email||[5] 17:55, 8 June 2013 (EDT)

GET RID OF ROLLBACK ALREADY

TIRED OF SEEING THAT AN ARTICLE IS MISSING ALL THE KEYWORDS I'VE ADDED, AND ISN'T BEING INDEXED, ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT SOMEONE UNDID THE LAST REVISION, , and most likely with rollback, AND GOT RID OF THEM ALL.-- Talk to me|Contribs 20:10, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

my understanding is that we no longer use those fields. :/ -hipcrime

21:41, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

still getting tired of seeing that an article isn't being indexed because someone didn't go back and check index and follow again. plus the keywords are good for seo--

Talk to me|Contribs 17:56, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Um...no. Not anymore. With ~old~ search engines, with the way they ~used~ to work that was true, but not anymore. Essentially the whole fucking page itself is key-everything. Search engines work that way now because of rampant abuse of meta-tags and the like, which were generally mucking up their services, which is why they dumped it. --Onideus

18:03, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

This information still has some kind of effect in regards to SEO. Even if it is a really small one. And we can use all the traffic we can get.

18:15, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

There are some lesser search engines/crawlers which still make use of them, but not many. It would make more sense to properly rename the IMAGE files within the article though. Overall it's file names that have the biggest general effect on search results, so if you've got an article with 100+ images and they're all named, "9342934.jpg" basically it's gonna seriously hinder the pages overall search ranking. That's why I always use overly detailed/categorized naming conventions with everything I upload. --Onideus

18:22, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Spam Account IP Addies

So I guess the "debate" is whether to ban for six months ~with~ an IP ban, or to NOT ban the IP and then ban the account for infinite...probably the later would be best I'm guessing, since the bots/spam artists don't really care about their throw-away IPs anyway.

Well, I suppose we could check: 94.23.235.168

Here's another: 37.59.151.194 - ElinorMEL - donovanwhetham1958@hotmail.com

And another: 173.234.232.252 - RickeyLev - carrollschubert@mailnesia.com

...someone wanna try that out? You'll have to guess on the port number, probably 80 or 8080 I'm guessing (just run through the standards). They might be restricted proxies though (specifically for use in spamming)...in which case I suppose banning the IPs doesn't much matter. *shrugs*

--Onideus 07:15, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

	“	If I was mad, I would have reconfigured one of my bots to run through EVERY contribution that Dumbfuck has ever made to the site and set it up to revert every...single...last...one...of...them. So no...I'm not mad. Dumbfucks generally don't make me angry, they just provide me with a convenient punching bag. ^__^	„
	—Onideus [6]

	“	m(Changed protection level for "User:Onideus": Excessive vandalism: I better change this to an hour, I don't entirely trust the Grease Monkey script I'm running, might crash the server given how butt mad these kiddies are. ([edit=sysop] (expires 06:34, ) (show/hide)	„
	—Onideus [7]

	“	Have fun fighting with my bot, Mr. Buttmad.	„
	—Onideus [8]

	“	(cur \| prev) 12:08, 7 June 2013 Onideus (Talk \| contribs \| rape) (108 bytes) (For my number one stalker fangurl! :D I see she's been busy making out with my Grease Monkey scripts. LOL)	„
	—Onideus [9]

	“	(show/hide) 17:57, 6 June 2013 Onideus (Talk \| contribs \| rape) flushed "File:Onideus Porn.jpg" ‎ (Crap: Setting my bot to remove this every four hours or so, that should keep you busy (and keep you from mucking up other articles with your retardation).) (view/restore)	„
	—Onideus [10]

Previous Quote | Next Quote

You have a history of using bots and scripts to undo edits by other users that you don't like. And this isn't the first time you've used bots to be a menace to others on a wiki. Don't forget that you are literally the only one who complains about them on the Thizzlehat Junction Center. So I think there is a definite possibility that some of these spam bots belong to you. I also question the practice of using bots on Encyclopedia Dramatica in the first place.

09:42, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Wow...boy you are just...STUPID...every gawd damn day of the WEEK, aren't you? Seriously Babyfur Nigger, take a day off already. *rolls eyes*

--Onideus

10:07, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

That statement should be retracted. [1] 10:21, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

His threats to harass users with bots dates back to 2010.[2] 10:27, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

So which is it, Dumbfuck, am I using bots to spam ED or aren't I? Yeesh, yer so gawd damn stupid you can't even keep your dumbfuck accusations straight. Hurr de durr! Are ~all~ niggers this fuckin stupid, or is Dumbfuck here just the exception? --Onideus 11:31, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Oh, by the by, speaking of the automated spam accounts, don't just nuke them arbitrarily (like I think some people are doing), make sure you *CHECK* first. If you don't know how/where to check for Wiki spam accounts, then best not to make ASSumptions. --Onideus 11:48, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

An outsider's view: bots and scripts do have valid uses on a wiki. They are there to take care of mundane things people don't have time to do (like welcoming everyone), filter out obvious spam accounts before they can post (they don't have to be nuked, they might just need to post for an Admin on a special page first), patrol pages for blanking, and maybe even encourage people to actually categorize images. However, it's possible to abuse bots if someone's having a hissyfit- this looks like a hissyfit.

If you don't like having an article about you, don't give them a reason to make an article (like throwing a hissyfit edit war over having an article about yourself). Seriously... you're staff. You're supposed to set an example for the other users as to what's acceptable here. Rank is not an excuse for special treatment, it's a reason to hold yourself to a higher standard. I don't know you guys personally and I don't give a fuck if this makes you rage or if you agree. This is just a stupid edit war and nothing more. --3tails 16:13, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Say what you like. Anyways, the events have been covered here.

16:19, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

*sigh* Kids these days...what the hell are they teaching you in school? Unless you're running some ancient piece of shit browser from last century...oh, hey, guess what? Yeah, you're running scripts on this and every other fucking site you've ever been on...you were just too ignorant/dim-witted to realize it. And guess what else? If you're running any browser plugins, you're PURPOSEFULLY and INTENTIONALLY running scripts on this and every other site you've ever been on...again, you were just too ignorant/dim-witted to realize it.

To even ~try~ and suggest that people shouldn't be allowed to use scripts/bots is no different from saying that you don't ever want anyone to ever step foot on the site ever unless they're running AOL ver 1.0 or some shit. Those like Schnookums are just angry and pissy because they don't know how to actively utilize browser plugins. Essentially they're whining because they don't know how to use a fucking browser! *epic face palm*

--Onideus

16:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Oh also, regarding this:

"Seriously... you're staff. You're supposed to set an example..."

Yes, as staff we are, which means if you get especially butthurt you aren't supposed to use ED and ED articles as your "personal army" to try and attack people with. In this particular case Schnookums was making blatant vanity/USI edits to an article...which, as staff, I was certainly within the right to be reverting them.

It should ALSO be noted that LATER, another admin came along, took his blatant shit/vanity edits, REWROTE THEM and REFORMATTED THEM (moving them to the bottom, restoring images that were stripped off and removing blatant attack/unfunny/unrelated images). Schnookums then came along, took one look at the article and ASSumed it had just been reverted and then proceeded to spaz the fuck out in a fury of butt mad rage and got into yet ~another~ edit war...only technically the second time he was in an edit war with Mr. Jonnz, which he didn't finally figure out until like FOUR HOURS later! *epic face palm*

In all honesty Schnookums should not be an admin. He hasn't been on the site very long, he's too young, he's too inexperienced, his edits aren't really all that great and he's overly emotional to the point where every other five minutes I feel compelled with a wanton desire to ask him if he needs a fucking tampon. Really, the ~only~ thing that makes him even remotely qualified to be an admin is the fact that he has no life and hangs out on the site every waking hour of the day...that's pretty well it. In all honesty...we could replace him with a fucking bot. --Onideus

16:54, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

you seem really upset. that's a lot of words too. maybe you should go write a book about it, it might make you feel better.--

Talk to me|Contribs 17:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

[[User:Schnookums|Schnookums]] likes this.

17:22, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Onideus, your anger is actually very cute. Please prove us all wrong by making a constructive edit. ~O b l i q u e 19:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

There ya go, I fixed your horrible ~rape~ of the English language, that's pretty constructive! :D

--Onideus

20:34, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Simple/Easy Way To Check Spam Accounts

You can use this site: http://www.stopforumspam.com

I think they've got the best database overall, which'll give you IPs and e-mail addresses associated with the spam account names. There's a bunch of others too, but for general use that's probably the best one to go by. --Onideus 22:06, 8 June 2013 (EDT)

TKN likes this. --TKN 22:09, 8 June 2013 (EDT)

New article

Just finished my latest masterpiece https://encyclopediadramatica.se/User:Dbaggins/Heath_Campbell

If someone could move it, that would be awesome.~ D. Baggins ~ 06:39, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Oh and while your at it you could link Heath Campbell's name to the article on the front page qotn~ D. Baggins ~ 06:43, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Amanda Bieber

Should this doofy retard get her own article, or should she just be added as a section to the Twitter article?

Name About missing Pics

[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

There's actually quite a lot more material this is just what I've uploaded so far. --Onideus 09:29, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Mmmm, it could also be added as a sub-section to the Justin Bieber article, since I guess she's his number one crazed fan...although his article is a lil "busy" already. --Onideus

15:00, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

wow. that is some brain melting shit. Justin Bieber is already really huge, plus this is one stupid bitch, with a pinch of homophobia to boot. i'd say she might deserve her own article. -hipcrime 15:11, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Old news from a year ago. By the way they're a troll.--

Talk to me|Contribs 16:43, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

ftfy -hipcrime

16:59, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

imo Beliebers deserve their own article because they are so easily trolled. -hipcrime

16:59, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Cut4bieber is already an article. What, so now you want to make another article just to further prove that grown men can in fact outwit children? Not saying cut4bieber wasn't funny, I'm just saying it was almost literally like taking candy from babies :: D. Baggins >> 17:12, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Because it's general/mainstream Internet dramaz...which we document. Because of Bieber's popularity a lot of the troll jobs associated with him (however easy) garner mass levels of attention, notoriety and public interest. --Onideus

17:17, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

WWDC, (World Wide Dicking-around Convention)

First it was the G3 ibook, and now this. Apple seem to have a knack of slapping a high price on their toilets and selling them to the public. Or does it look like a coffee machine? Jazzybellio4912

Actually it looks like a candle holder...in fact I think I might edit a candle into that picture just for shits and giggles. --Onideus

17:01, 12 June 2013 (EDT)

Here you go:

This makes much more sense! Jazzybellio4912

[[User:Onideus|Onideus]] likes this. -- 18:37, 12 June 2013 (EDT)

LOL, these are freakin awesome! :D

--Onideus

19:03, 12 June 2013 (EDT)

Yeah that's shitting rainbows for me too! Jazzybellio4912

Encyclopedia Dramatica:Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/25

Contents

Trolling - God Tier Level!

Interwiki

Spam Accounts Are Getting Out Of Hand

Bring back Space Moose

Massive FaceBook Spam Flooding In Progress

CHECK UR PRIVILEGE NOW

The Cancer That's Killing ED

GET RID OF ROLLBACK ALREADY

Spam Account IP Addies

Simple/Easy Way To Check Spam Accounts

New article

Amanda Bieber

WWDC, (World Wide Dicking-around Convention)

Navigation menu