Talk:Onideus Mad Hatter/Archive1

Moar info: Talk:Onideus Mad Hatter/Nobody give a fuck.

For all instances where Onideus posted on this talk page and nobody gave a shit and didn't respond.

Obnoxious Sad Fatter

Christ, good damn you dumb fat fuck... Instead of getting off your stinky diaper ass and look for a freaking job, your too concerned about your old ED page. Jesus Man, stop living off fucking goverdamit handouts to extend your painkiller pill addiction. After kicking you out of A26 I figured you'd learn some self respect and fix up your broke ass life. I was wrong. PRO-TIP: Don't list one day jobs all over your long ass resume every time you get $25 for some crappy ass flash video.--Hatter read the book my steel-toe boot wrote, it's called on the road to your ass. 01:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

U mad, bro? Or just drunk again? LOL --Onideus 01:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

FA Ban

It's takes an uber special kind of magnificent bastard to be able to get banned for harassing a CORPSE! :3

Don't forget teh libels too!

• I loled--Draconas 21:47, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

The Secret

...is apparently to just openly post ~all~ of your personal information (which I've been doing since ~1995). The trick is, I think, in that so long as you don't remain in ~exactly~ the same place for more than a few years at a time...everything gets ~completely~ fucked up (as far as bots/people trying to keep track of supposed personal information)...to the point where at 33 you're apparently a FIFTY year old (damn I look good for 50) and still living in a house you once owned back in the BUSH ADMINISTRATION! o_O

It's the concept of "information overload" I think, basically continually flooding the system with so much real personal information that it effectively becomes impossible to make any coherent distinction as to what's really real (in the present sense) and what's completely outdated and/or mixed up with other people's information.

...stupidity though I think is also a pretty big factor...and stupidity when combined with spam/automated "information" sites, basically peddling faux, mixed up bullshit to any desperate kook who wants to buy into it, all the while raping them with ads, malware and the like. For example, in my particular case, if one wasn't a complete retard they could ~very~ easily look up the publicly available County Assessor information on the particular house I once owned: http://wallawallawa.taxsifter.com/taxsifter/t-assessor.asp?pid=360719520822

...which very obviously shows I no longer own it, nor live there, nor ~have~ lived there since like 2009. Needless to say though, kooks generally aren't all that bright.  ;)

--Onideus 17:04, 27 May 2013 (EDT)

rm Mary Sue

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/index.php?title=Matthew_Moulton&curid=6087&diff=538753&oldid=538752

So yeah, people can their userpages to glorify themselves. This article is being actively maintained so I removed everything Mary Sue. I could have sworn the article had keywords and description fill out but those mysteriously disappeared. Maybe I am mistaken. 08:20, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

By which he means he removed relevant links to family members (maybe he's got some kind of crush on my sister?) and breaking images so that they come up as red links. Dumbfuck user is a DUMBFUCK! --Onideus 08:23, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Again, that's Mary Sue stuff. You said yourself that you only put it in because you wanted it there. 08:24, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Hello, DUMBFUCK! I uploaded pretty well *EVERYTHING* in this article. Tha'fawk they sure are breeding you morons STUPID these days! Only the TEXT MATERIAL was written by OTHERS, every-fucking-thing-else is *MINE*, as in *I* put it there, you DUMBFUCK! --Onideus 08:28, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Article Edits

By the by, anyone who isn't a DUMBFUCK is free to edit this article as they like. If you start replacing relevant images with broken red links and removing active/relevant content though I'm gonna revert it (basically don't vandalize it). It ~does~ need to be cleaned up, primarily in removing BROKEN LINKS (of which there are many) and adding NEWER content. Most of the material at present is pretty out of date (pre 2010). Like there's no mention at all of my uncle's death, or any of the family dramaz stuffs that I've been posting to my FB page over the past three years. There's *LOTS* of other good material that could be taken off my FaceBook page as well (and it's completely open so anyone can see everything on it). --Onideus 09:28, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

In other words, only edits that Matthew Moulton approves of are allowed. 09:31, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

In other words, just don't vandalize/remove material, Dumbfuck. --Onideus 09:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Yes, because you know what the article was going to look like had I been able to work on it. Also LOL at using a bot to protect a page on a wiki. I AM SO SORRY I HAVE OFFENDED YOU! 09:39, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

	“	We're not pedos, we just want to be kids again, cant help that we still have adult urges!	„

Now I see why you are vandalizing that article. You didn't want people to see that quote. 10:21, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

move page

This page has been moved because this article is really about an Encyclopedia Dramatica admin. Most here don't know him by his real name so I feel Onideus is more relevant to the wiki. 11:46, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

article integrity

Average users are not allowed to edit their articles and remove content they don't like. And I don't see why Onideus is any different just because he is an admin. If my edits suck, then other users/editors/admins can correct them. However since this article is about him, well he clearly is biased about it's content. He is also attempting to make Encyclopedia Dramatica his personal army by adding family members that he himself has stated he hates. This is why users shouldn't contribute to articles they are the subject of. Simply looking at the talk page, it is very clear he is attempting to use his admin status to bully other users. Articles exist about other admins and they are not throwing the temper tantrum he is. 11:52, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

userpage

Should Onideus want a page that is tailored to his liking, then I recommend he user his userpage. This is Encyclopedia Dramatica and this website does NOT guarantee that an article written about someone will show them in a favorable light. We've got plenty of users/editors/admins and if my edits suck, one of them can say something. Normally anyone who attempts to modify an article about them gets into trouble. Onideus did prevent me from adding relevant images, removing redlinks, quotes and other content. I removed the link to his sister's Facebook page because again, Encyclopedia Dramatica is NOT HIS PERSONAL ARMY. Who gives a shit if he is an admin, the rules still apply. 12:00, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

penis -hipcrime 19:04, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

I know. 19:10, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Tavi-Baby is just upset because I keep removing all his personal spam art off my article. So of course he's crying like the nigger babyfur he is. --Onideus 02:15, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Now what is your justification?

Seems the vandal is indeed you. 13:26, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

My "justification" is you're making the exact same kind of random/nonsense/unrelated edits that Robert James was doing four years ago...*ALL* of which were reverted/burned off the page (repeatedly) by multiple admins (on old ED). You're not adding anything but random, made up, shit that you're pulling out your ass because you're buttmad and too lazy to put in any ~actual~ research or effort. In short, this is *NOT* Uncyclopedia, you Dumbfuck! --Onideus 13:39, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Naw. You just want preferential treatment that isn't available to others. 13:44, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Naw. I just don't want YOUR personal porn collection spooged all over my article, Dumbfuck. Go put that furry fap shit of yours on your own page and yiff in hell while yer at it, you Dumbfuck furry. --Onideus 13:46, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

This is a wiki where everyone is allowed to contribute. If you want a perfect article, create one in your userspace. 13:47, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

This is ED, not Uncyclopedia, Dumbfuck. If you don't want your shit edits reverted, don't make shit edits. --Onideus 13:49, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

You only care because you don't want others to know what you are. It's cute. 13:50, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

We all know that you're a sick fuck and you will never manage to suppress that information. You made the decision to be a pedophile, now live with it. 13:54, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

You see how clueless he is? I mean he's spooging random, personal porn crap on my article to the point where he's too gawd damn stupid to even notice I've never reverted edits posting my DOX (including SS number), nor outright accusations of pedophilia and other material that's *WAY* worse than the shit he's trying to add (that material of course was at least ~made~ to look like it came from me). --Onideus 13:56, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

So what you are saving is users/editors/admins who have articles written about them are allowed to dispute every single detail on the article? 13:58, 6 June 2013 (EDT)

Just To Point Something Out For The N00bs

This article ~technically~ isn't entirely about "me" per se. I mean, as in "me" Matthew Moulton, actual, physical, real me. See there's actually quite a number of "me", or I should say "Onideus" or "Mad Hatter". I am the one who ~started~ it of course (well, I guess you could say Brad Turcotte is the ~original~, original "me"), but ~anyone~ can use the name and post ~as~ me (and dozens of people do). The primary point is that the character form represents an absolutely impenetrable, unfaltering ego that is literally not bothered by ~anything~...that's the point, that's what the character form is supposed to be used as. It's like a quasi Internet super villain character if you will. You can attack others, but they in turn are unable to attack you. Basically designed to make people RAGE and FROTH (like our newest "Hatter Addict" Schnookums) while not giving them any real outlet to "get back" at them in any coherent way. The result is basically the person goes stark raving stupid crazy and often escalates things either to the point of shooting themselves in the head, completely ruining their life (potentially winding up living out of a storage facility), or put in jail. All three of which have happened since the character's inception...multiple times. --Onideus 12:25, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

Absolutely disgusting. Stop reverting peoples' edits to make your article more self masturbatory. I haven't seen trollshielding this bad since ED Singers. --VladimirLenin 19:28, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

^^^^-- Talk to me|Contribs 19:42, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

What's this "peoples" shit, Fuckface? I only reverted ONE person's edits and did so because they were SHIT and VANITY edits. I would have reverted them on *ANY* article, not just mine. And for the benefit of your ignorant stupidity, it wasn't simply my opinion, in that the edits were ~so~ shit that ~another~ admin came along and REWROTE THEM! And, hurr de durr, the REWRITES weren't reverted, you blithering dumbfuck! --Onideus 19:55, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

You continue to mention vanity, could you show me which edit in the article's history that was? 19:57, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

I have more relevant things to do with my time than try and explain to some dumbfuck n00b what a vanity edit is. Go read ED:101 kiddo. --Onideus 20:01, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

PS - *looks at contribution history* So whose sock puppet are you supposed to be? BabyBunny I'm guessing.

--Onideus 20:01, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Whoah there Onideus, no need to act like a cliche villain from an 80's cartoon now. You're in your 40's after all. Stop acting like you're in your 30's. --VladimirLenin 20:04, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

“   "I have more relevant things to do with my time than try and explain to some dumbfuck n00b what a vanity edit is. Go read ED:101 kiddo.   „     —Onideus, unable to answer my question, "You continue to mention vanity, could you show me which edit in the article's history that was?" 20:05, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Hey Dumbfuck, why don't you go ask Jonzz to explain it to your stupid ass, he's the one who took the bother to rewrite yer shit vanity edits for you. Really, you should be slurping his ass for doing you such a favor. --Onideus 20:10, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

So no answer. Got it. 20:12, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

So too stupid to ask the person who corrected your slop. Got it. Would you like me to ask him for you? Maybe he could go and buy a box of Crayolas and try coloring it out for your especially slow ass. --Onideus 20:18, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

	“	What's this "peoples" shit, Fuckface? I only reverted ONE person's edits and did so because they were SHIT and VANITY edits	„
	—Onideus

This is you...

Well? 20:22, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

...not contributing anything useful to the site. Your innate furry ~need~ to run around trying to create melodrama everywhere you stumble onto is cute, it is, but not very relevant. You effectively represent the reason why furries should be systematically slaughtered en masse for the benefit of general human progress. I am a firm believer that furry driven Histrionic Personality Disorder is the sole retarding force sludging up humanity's scientific and intellectual evolution. To put it bluntly (and probably the only way a furfag like yourself can understand)...YIFF IN HELL! :D

--Onideus 20:31, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

You're still avoiding the question. 20:39, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

*makes popcorn*

Furtards...at least they're entertaining, amirite? :D

Check out the way he's attempting to play "fursecuted victim" by imagining that his edits were somehow altered or changed. LOL I think NKO is right, it's high time we make an article for Schnookums the irritable n00b furfag. Given his furry disposition it'll probably make him kookplode with endless talk page froth and rage for weeks on end. ^__^

--Onideus 20:47, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

	“	Which is why you tried removing large chunks of it, eh Dumbfuck?	„
	—Onideus [1]

Still refu-COCK SLAP-

That's my cock, all the fuck up in your face. LOL Might as well give the "fursecuted" dumbfuck what he wants so badly. *snicker*

--Onideus 20:56, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

GG 21:05, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

I wonder what work of fiction you'll jot down for ~this~ little nugget, Onideus? *snicker* it seems to me that you're having troubles handling the pressure. Here, have a cat to calm you down ^__^  :: D. Baggins >> 21:31, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

	“	Schnookums, as a result of editing my article, is currently making posts on Flickr, requesting that child pornography be posted to his ED user page. Some of us play very high level/nasty troll games with each other on this site, most of which were initially created some twenty years ago on the Usenet group alt.hackers.malicious. Best to be careful not to get involved unless you like playing on that field. Just remember, anything you try doing to someone can and very likely will be done to you in turn. ^__^	„

He is probably impersonating me on Flickr as we speak, asking everyone for child pornography. 21:58, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

http://bit.ly/14Rascy Nope, They're not.-- Talk to me|Contribs 22:39, 10 June 2013 (EDT)