Dcrisisbeta

Dcrisisbeta, aka Crisis, aka Fernando is a batshit insane "artist" who spends an inordinate amount of time drawing nothing but small children, very often naked and/or in situations involving the children being scared, humiliated, hurt, upset, terrorized and of course... kidnapped and mutilated.

Disturbing Artwork

Aside from the naked children with super high resolution genitals in ultra fine detail that Fernando enjoys drawing so much he also occasionally finds the time to churn out especially horrifying renditions of his "characters", or at least what we all hope are his "characters" and not like actual children he may have raped, murdered and mutilated.

About missing Pics

[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

Disturbing Commentary

Additionally disturbing is the comments he adds to these pictures, which very often convey a sense of underlying guilt that's continually nagging at him like a dead child's still beating heart stuffed into a sack and buried under his house.

About missing Pics

Sex with children counts as exercise... glad we cleared that up, Fernando!
'Pedos are sure they're right, but that doesn't mean they should hurt children.' WUT?!
By "give up" I think he means turn himself in and reveal where the bodies are buried.
His very own pedo version of "The Tell Tale Heart".
Translation: "Let the kids make the first move."

[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

Pedophile Artwork

Ironically, DeviantArt requires pictures of naked children to be tagged as "mature", meaning there is no question as to whether DeviantArt understands what those images are actually being used for. Pedophiles like Fernando of course bitch about that fact at every opportunity because they don't want to be easily exposed for the sick fuck faggots that they really are.

It's not that difficult to identify an overly obvious wank artist like Fernando though. They give themselves away on several fronts, primarily in regards to size and detail. If you peruse through a pedo's art gallery you'll find that the images involving child nakedness are more often than not HUGE! We're talkin resolutions off the fuckin map here! His largest in fact is over 4 fucking K and in its original file size can't even be uploaded to ED!

Similarly, the detail of the genitals will often outmatch the overall detail of the rest of the image. That is, they basically spent 75% of the time fagging away anatomically accurate kiddy dicks and 25% of the time fumbling on out the vague, largely incoherent characters they're attached to.

Lastly, even when they do self-censor their artwork for such sites they STILL draw the genitals anyway. They actually spend an inordinate amount of time drawing a gawd damn dick on a child that they will then cover up (often poorly or just partially), after the fact, to try and pass themselves off as not being such an overly obvious sick sack of shit. Like, "Oh, okay, you must be totally normal because you didn't show us the genitals... the ones that you still spent six hours drawing only to partly cover with a semi-transparent plant leaf." Yeah, totally not obvious or anything there, Fernando.

About missing Pics

[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

Diaper Fetish Disguise

Like all disgusting degenerates Fernando wants to "fit in" with society and somehow not be perceived as a sick, twisted monster who wants to violate children for the sake of sexual gratification. This need for normalcy can be seen in almost any fringe fixation or out of touch interest and it generally follows a hierarchy type pattern of horribly heinous horeshit. A proverbial pyramid pile of poo, with the top part of the repugnant piece being the prioritized property; no one wants their sick fuckery flavor to be on the bottom rung of the fertilizer fuel cycle.

As such, one community gauged as more sick and twisted than another interest will generally try and "fit in" and "adopt" the lesser perceived pariah of social pecking piles as a means of taking the egregious edge off their esophagus erupting repugnance. The most obvious and prominent of these bottom tier types being the bestiality or "animal rape" aficionados who rebrand themselves as "ferals" within the more politically palatable piece of people poop that is the furry community.

Pedophiles are no different, however being even lower than animal orgy organizers they have to reach for one poo pie lower than furries, the easy/obvious choice being, of course, adult babies. Less obvious than the self-labeled "ferals" of the furtard tribe, pedophiles often blend in better with the man-baby brigrade. There are however some key points of difference that very often expose these poser piles of pants puke that you can use to differentiate the two types of head tripping trash...

The biggest sign comes from examining their art as a whole. Adult babies will gravitate primarily to anything affixed to the concepts of helplessness and loss of control, anything that signifies dependence upon others. The penultimate piece of Pamperhood of course being the diaper. So if you're looking at their art, as a whole, and every gawd damn doodle is done up in a diaper there's generally no question at all where their fixation falls. With pedos the diapers are more of an after thought, something they might randomly throw in here and there but not something they obsess over.

Likewise, even if they include diapers they'll often only be seen in situations in which the baby/child is about to be NAKED, so if the kid is changing their clothes or if they're getting their diaper changed... the focus isn't the diaper, the focus is getting the kid naked. Often they'll have similar pictures where the child is wearing regular underwear and there's nothing directly babyish about it at all.

The third blazing red flag is the muse, the physical medium upon which the diapers are drawn onto. For actual adult babies this includes, well... EVERYTHING! Adults, kids, babies, furries, fuck even plushies and plastic crap aren't inescapable from their baby bottom wrapper black hole. Things can even go right on over the edge of sanity itself with characters being turned into diapers! Again, anything that significantly signifies helplessness and dependency. Pedophiles on the other hand are interested primarily in prepubescent puke artistry, so again, even if they include diapers they will usually never be drawn on an adult or anything BUT a teen/child/baby.

Last but not least is their lexicon. Pedophiles often give themselves away whenever they open their idiot mouths. The especially retarded ones will come right out and describe a child as "sexy". The slightly less retarded ones will often just hint at where their mind is at, usually with open ended questions to try incite discussion about possible sexual scenarios or acts that may ensue from the seemingly innocuous piece of innocence. When pedos share their fap fodder on sites like DeviantArt you're very often looking at the "opening scene" of what's going to erupt on into full blown child rape in the sickly imaginative minds of malignant moppet molesters.

About missing Pics