Talk:Not the real Drmusic2

Could someone go through the archive file and ctrl+f to find the rest of the images for this article? I would do it myself but it is over 10gb and I am on a terribly slow connection. --zaiger (talk) 08:38, 23 July 2011 (CEST)

• I would but as I am a newb I need to know where to access the archive file itself. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 01:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Mariana Hanks

How come this doesn't mention the fact that she's actually a woman who goes by the pseudonym "Nathan"? Albireo 01:11, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

• Because the EDiots on the forum still think she's a man because in the photo she has facial hair which is actually normal for girls to have, I don't know why people only think guys have it though.

the article

I'm sorry for acting like a butthurt moron and for being an asshole on the forums, i'm not a werejohncandy or anything, i'm a human being and this was all my fault.

Could yo please take it down?

user:Wereleno

lol ok Ge5undhe17 09:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

nope it got back up sorry Ge5undhe17 09:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

• • Oh alright, sorry to bother ya. Have a nice day.

No Mr. Werelano, were are sorry to bother you, please don't let it get you down, and have a nice day. 23:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

• • Ge5undhe17, i'd just like to apologize for double-posting and for acting like a butthurt crybaby and for causing all the trouble in the first place, I know i'm the one who are started it in the first place by white-knighting for werekatt. I know it was a foolish thing to do and I realize that now. Also to whoever trolled me, good show, I loved it. And that's the were-LENO as in Jay Leno not lano, lano sounds like the name of a computer brand kind of like linux.

user:wereleno

Not a werecreature

Could you at least put in the article that all the werecreature stuff isn't real and that drmusic2-1 is a human being in real life and that he never pretended to be a werejohncandy or anything? 00:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)~

User:wereleno

=About the makeup photos

You know the girl in the makeup photos? That is not a friend of Nathan's, he did not rape or abduct them and that girl is actually him in real life. I'm surprised you didn't put that in the article. Wereleno 00:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

user:wereleno

The article

Could you get rid of all those captions? I think they are unnecessary, if anything - you could have at least put some more creative ones. And one thing that always bothers me is why people on here view people with aspergers as being 'inhuman' mongoloids with no emotions and that they state facts no one cares about. Just because they have a mental or phsyical disability does NOT mean that they are nothing other than human, even though they are disabled they are capable of living normal, happy healthy lives and hell - there are many sucessful people who may or may not have mental or physical disabilities.

Also what you said about Nathan being 'gay' is completely wrong, if you think that the term 'closet' in monster in the closet is a homosexuality reference it isn't, it is referring to the old mythos regarding the Boogieman, a monster that is often told about in stories by parents as a means of scaring children.

It is in no way connected to the movie starring that chick from the Black Eyed Peas.

Also that girl in the photos is actually what Nathan looks like in real life, it's a girl named Mariana Hanks - not a friend of his. But since this is a case of EDiots being...well complete and utter idiots, it's sad that they would actually claim that the girl was 'abducted' or 'raped' as they put it, when that girl IS Nathan. How can you abduct your own self? That's just stupid.

Could you re-correct some things in the article and by somethings I mean everything isn't true? And could you send an email to Nathan at [email protected], apologizing to him for what you wrote about him?