- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
User talk:JuniusThaddeus/Archive1: Difference between revisions
imported>JuniusThaddeus Reverting – No thanks. |
imported>JuniusThaddeus Reverting – No thanks. |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 13:27, 26 February 2012
See Archive 2 for August-December.
April
Kirby
Hello Michael. Just dropped by to return the compliment. No, actually, I didn't. Truth be told, I'm wondering if you're you planning to Ruin ED with another Moralfag Crusade against Jailbait, Lolicon and everything else you find personally objectionable? Many people here believe in free speech; that's one of the things that ED stood for, back in the days before you were granted administrative privileges. Thought we should both state our views on the subject while the wiki is still under construction. I take it back.
SimonKirby 14:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Michael, I don't wish to fight over an acre of sand. Perhaps you might consider coming to my talk page and discussing the subject in a reasonable manner. You've usually been prepared to in the past, and I'd be (very) happy if Ty could act as an unofficial mediator - we both know he's extremely fair and impartial. If we can work this out by talking, I'm willing to take the chance. Cheers, SimonKirby 23:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC).
- Jesus I really am fair and impartial and shit, I should be an adminSysOp! You could make it happen Jun :) Ty 12:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Proposal
You rewrite the entire Flaggot article. --Halcy 12:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- When you're done, I can purge the history if you want. --Halcy 15:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Reply
>The article does its best to hide its association with you.
With respect, Michael, the TGcomix article does precisely the same thing: it is carefully worded to leave out Brainwurms and Thayo, both of whom were major contributors to various events. They wrote the article and deliberately omitted their roles. Under any other circumstances, TGcomix would considered a pointless attack page, no different to the MaruMariMaru article (which was deleted as such).
>You also created the Brainwurms article because he's your archenemy, yet the article doesn't mention you at all.
The article is still under construction. When it's finished, it will document his self-admitted flaggotry, along with his obsession for feminists and self-identified transsexuals (and trust me, there is a LOT of screencap evidence available). Naturally, it will intersect with the events of the TGcomix article, and will mention all participants.
>My biggest concern is the Flaggot article. It doesn't mention that TGcomix (you) made it up.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. All articles are written by someone. If you're saying that Flaggots don't exist, then you're simply wrong - as stated in the article, the practice is rampant on DA, Youtube and numerous imagehosting sites. Again, I can provide screencap documentation from people who brag on these venues that they flagged various individuals out of petty spite or a desire to troll.
Incidentally, contrary to what the TGcomix article claims, the word "flaggot" has been in use since 2006 (links can be provided on request). It became more common on Youtube between 2009 and 2010, and therefore should be documented as a form of internet terminology.
>When you came to ed.ch under a new pseudonym, you didn't have any intention of revealing who you are or what your motivations were.
Michael, SimonKirby is just one of many handles I've used over the years (I can supply links to confirm, if you want). As for my supposed motivations, you're simply mistaken in your assumptions once again. As repeatedly stated on ED and elsewhere, I'm here to criticize online censorship and ridicule moralfaggotry. In that respect, I'm no different to a thousand other Ediots posting here.
>You were going to use eh.ch to write about anyone who crossed you while hiding the fact that it's personal.
It's not personal Michael, its just lulz. Let's take a look at the whole sordid mess for a different perspective: some shithole trolls DA for months on end, whipping the moralfags into a frenzy. Said moralfags take revenge by writing shitty attack articles on ED and claiming a major pwn. Shithole infiltrates the article and rewrites it for three months right under their noses until he gets bored and deliberately reveals his presence. The resulting shitstorm spills over onto half a dozen different site: DA, ED, Whatport80, Hentai Foundry, Tinychan, Minichan, and eventually Wikipedia and Commons. The drama is still ongoing, two years after the initial events, and obviously, more than one person was involved. That IS lulz, Michael. If it isn't, then we need a new definition for the word.
>The "Confirmed flaggots" section is just a list of people who hurt you.
Michael, you have to admit that you and Herostratus generated a hell of a lot of drama out on en.Wikidedia and Commons. The "debate" went on for days, spilling over onto at least three different noticeboards/DRs that I know of. No clear consensus was reached on Commons, and the use of Wikipi-tan on Fanservice is still unresolved. The issues might have been personally important to you, Michael, but to a disinterested observer, it was just another ridiculous shitfest over two worthless pics in an insignificant online article. Again, that kind of drama is worth documenting.
Herostratus has repeatedly jumped the gun in his moral crusade, and you've made it clear that you have ethical objections to certain types of imagery being used on Wikipedia. Again, these concerns are of personal significance to you, but the average Ediot would describe it as simple moralfaggotry. As noted in the Flaggot article, moralfags are notorious for attempting to remove content they find personally objectionable.
As for Brainwurms, the guy is a self-admitted flaggot who has publicly stated he enjoys filing malicious reports (screencap evidence available on request). If a guy stands up and actually brags about being a flaggot, then his status is confirmed. Given these circumstances, there's no reason why he should be exempt from ridicule: this is ED, and by definition, everybody is subject to trolling.
Have to go now, will talk again later. Cheers, SimonKirby 15:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC).
RE:Thumbnails
Thanks for the tips. It has been fixed. --Halcy 20:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
RE:You sound familiar.
Yeah I would have banned TGcomix, but banning isn't done so heavily on this wiki. It's a nice wiki yeah, it feels pretty nice doing work for ED again. --Halcy 20:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hmmm... SHE? Interest enhanced! Ty 05:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
May
RE:
I ain't. --PresidentMudkip 23:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
New user account
Do you know the MediaWiki page to change the "New user account" text to say "A challenger appears!"? --Zæg 00:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Awesome thanks. --Zæg 03:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Juni
How do you get the banned user message to say [Sysop] raeped [user] instead of [sysop] blocked [user]? oh and how do you change the Block log's title to Molestation log? --PresidentMudkip 18:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Good to see you Junius.
Welcome to the Resistance. Turbogook 21:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Sup
Honestly, you're a sight for sore eyes (along with this place). Welcome back, and I hope to be of some use to you guys. - Vinland 16:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey
Quick question, how are you finding all the links that you are changing from .com to .ch? I thought i had gotten most of them using search. Dildo Baggins 00:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Awesome thanks. Still getting used to the talk pages and everything else around here for that matter. Dildo Baggins 00:10, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Bots
Do we have Bots that can do all of the link changing? It just seems almost silly to keep making single minor edits to this shit (even if it does bring up my edit count substantially) Dildo Baggins 19:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Lol ill take your word for it then. Dildo Baggins 19:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Re: Editnotices
Thanks :) TKN 20:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the help
with the templates here. That's one less pain in the ass to deal with. — Preceding comment added by Armucat (talk • contribs), 03:40, 19 May 2011
Hi!
Sysopped, please hit me up on irc or via email so i can get your email account and such set up. Grats! Garrett 14:45, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Lock plz?
Sagechu and his friends are sperging all over his article after running crying to Zaiger didn't get it removed like they thought it would. Mind throwing a lock on it?--MeetTheMedic 13:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- But it was Sagechu who went crying to the mods, according to MeetTheMedic. --Divx-Mongool 11:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Holy fuck
You almost fixed gap on POTN box TKN 15:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I experimented around a little bit with it for a while but did not find all of the broken tags. 15:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Still there, but smaller. --TKN 16:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey
Just saw your ping in IRC. Noticed I was being talked about there and couldn't help myself. I have no intentions on going back to argue, just wanted to throw my POV out there. Thanks for sticking up for me to Sherrod by the way. --zaiger (talk) 01:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well I do appreciate it. Though I'm not sure I have attacked anyone, maybe I have added a joke on the wiki here and there, but I honestly know nothing about these attacks they are talking about. As for power-hungry, that is the pot calling the kettle black. She not only tried to kill the site, but actively tried to suppress the contents from being available. Maybe it is because I finally got my admins back after literally years of her dicking me around and dangling them in front of my face. I don't know what twisted view of the world she has, but in the real world having access on a website is not "power". I am just doing what I see fit to keep this website running smoothly. I don't think I have abused my privileges or any of the users, but if I have and have been too drunk with power to realize it please let me know. --zaiger (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
MediaWiki Talk:Common.js
Can you copy js on that page to MediaWiki:Common.js --TKN 02:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
I need a favor
Can you plz change the "Deletion Log"'s name to "Plumbing Log"? --PræsidentMudkip 05:12, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Done. 05:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
OhShit
The number of people that got on that over there was spectacular and lulzy, and continues to grow because someone had the balls to call them out on their bullshit. I apologize if this put a halt to your presence there, and I really am grateful you took action to begin with. If there's anything you need of me, I'll always be available. - Vinland 19:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Thoughts
Potential much? - Vinland 00:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- That's perfectly fine; I'm just looking for more content to add to it. What I want to know is whether or not it's a worthy topic in the first place. - Vinland 00:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Wow. It's like the whole gang is here.
This site is pretty great. Every time I think of an ED article I think, RIP, but wait, it's still going! All my favorite reads are still up, albeit without images. I'm really glad we have this site. And if I want to inform somebody about something internet related, well, I'll be damned if I use OI. The real scoop is here. And today, I decide to stop by recent changes, and what do I see? JuniusThaddeus! You just threw a whole big pile of hope on me. I look at some of the guys here, and I think nothing of value was lost. I think I'm ready to start contributing again. A few days ago I took to trolling the ED mailing list, and some asshat named Arthur Hatfield called me "one of the most useless editors," We'll see about that. But damn, is it good to see you here. ED never died, it was just down for a bit!
Also, what's up with the .ch domain? Isn't that, like, China? --Brxbrx 16:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- alright. who's arthur hatfield, anyways? killhamster? And I can't tell you how good it is to see my fave articles till up. Hopefully I won't ruin them...--Brxbrx 17:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm curious
What, exactly, is your opinion of OI? Thank you.--Brxbrx 04:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- so you were disillusioned by OI's elitism, and you found yourself constrained by the formatting? What will you do with your OI experiences with regards to this site? Non-sequitur: I'm making eggplant/aubergine, and I'm terrible at it. What I'm making is simply disgusting. I am an incompetent cook.--Brxbrx 00:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- yeah, I saw that. no idea you were michaelsuarez, though. Anyhow, since you've always been one of the more levelheaded folks at ED, I figured you could make some positive contributions to our plicies here. You did have some plans in mind with OI, maybe you could implement some of them here? For example, the editing form (don't know if it was your idea or not): perhaps we can have something similar, but optional, as additional guidance to new editors? Certainly in some cases a form could be useful, if you don't know where to start. Personally, I think wikipoints are cancerous (I'm really hoping those weren't your idea), but maybe not all things from OI need be damned? I know you said you had no say in design or layout, but you also said you helped build the site. You wre referring to just articles?
Also, do we have the saranwrap template here? I looked for it but didn't find it. I've been involved in some wiki-drama o'er at RW, and I'd like to have a secret weapon. Thanks.--Brxbrx 01:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)- I figured the forms could be optional for beginners that found it easier to edit with a framework. But the more I think about it, it seems that Kazantzaki's guide already covered that. Saranwrap was a template which turned the entire page into a link. You couldn't click anywhere without falling prey to whatever link was in place. It was mostly used to vandalize user pages, which is what I intend to do with it on RW. For defensive purposes, naturally. Ina bit, I think I'm going to go make some big updates to the RW article. A lot of shit's gone own there. Do you still stand by the belief that articles should be concise? thanks--Brxbrx 02:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- lol, I was asking because I didn't know how to make such a template from scratch. No matter, I still have {{kittens}} to emulate. All I need is to sneak it past RW's recent changes (unless you know a means to use templates interwiki?).
As for RationalWiki, wow (also, lol at the WIGO: RationalWiki- you wrote most of the article here, right?). The oldfags like to think the place is still their circlejerk, where they can flame people at will to chase them away and talk within their closeknit group group about how cool and hardcore they all are. Newfags like me want the place to be more civil-ish. There was a bunch of stuff going on to further these opposing visions for the site, most notably a mass removal of everybody's user rights. Users were flying about insulting each other, and cries of "fascism" abound. A bunch of editors decided to leave and never come back. Some oldfags started harassing other users (I'd say these other users were middle-aged fags. Don't really know the term for people in between), they were banned. Their friends unbanned them. The site is still running, articles are being made, stuff is being discussed, but behind the scenes people are at each others' throats. Hmm... doesn't sound as dramatic now that I've explained it to you. If you'd like, you can check out RationalWikiWiki. It's a wiki dedicated to analyzing RationalWiki. Yes, we are vain. Maybe it's too Web 2.0 for you.--Brxbrx 03:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- lol, I was asking because I didn't know how to make such a template from scratch. No matter, I still have {{kittens}} to emulate. All I need is to sneak it past RW's recent changes (unless you know a means to use templates interwiki?).
- I figured the forms could be optional for beginners that found it easier to edit with a framework. But the more I think about it, it seems that Kazantzaki's guide already covered that. Saranwrap was a template which turned the entire page into a link. You couldn't click anywhere without falling prey to whatever link was in place. It was mostly used to vandalize user pages, which is what I intend to do with it on RW. For defensive purposes, naturally. Ina bit, I think I'm going to go make some big updates to the RW article. A lot of shit's gone own there. Do you still stand by the belief that articles should be concise? thanks--Brxbrx 02:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- yeah, I saw that. no idea you were michaelsuarez, though. Anyhow, since you've always been one of the more levelheaded folks at ED, I figured you could make some positive contributions to our plicies here. You did have some plans in mind with OI, maybe you could implement some of them here? For example, the editing form (don't know if it was your idea or not): perhaps we can have something similar, but optional, as additional guidance to new editors? Certainly in some cases a form could be useful, if you don't know where to start. Personally, I think wikipoints are cancerous (I'm really hoping those weren't your idea), but maybe not all things from OI need be damned? I know you said you had no say in design or layout, but you also said you helped build the site. You wre referring to just articles?
RE: Wikipedia Portal
Thanks, it looks much better now.
15:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Your thoughts
Hey i wanted to just check something, what do you think about creating a guide on how to write an article, i know there are random bits on ED:101 and the new articles portal, but i want to create a step by step guide to writing and shaping one, do you think we need one? thanks--Shika 06:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- can we dredge up kazantzaki's guide, if we don't have it currently?--Brxbrx 18:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- major misunderstanding. I didn't know if we still had kazantzaki's guide, hence my post above, then, on my talk page, I followed up on my previous question asking your opinion of Oh Internet. I probably should've posted it in the relevant section, and at the very least, on your talkpage. Proceed as normal.--Brxbrx 19:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply you 2, that guide is very well done so i don't feel the need to have a paraphrased rehash--Shika 03:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- major misunderstanding. I didn't know if we still had kazantzaki's guide, hence my post above, then, on my talk page, I followed up on my previous question asking your opinion of Oh Internet. I probably should've posted it in the relevant section, and at the very least, on your talkpage. Proceed as normal.--Brxbrx 19:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
main page preview
hey bb do we need Main Page/Preview ? H64 11:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- k baleeted <3 H64 12:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Ban request
I need Hnr SUPER permabanned for mod sass. He keeps vandalizing my usertalk. He did so earlier with an account called Hater123. I guess he won't learn his lesson PræsidentMudkip 01:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Copy of a past article
Do you have a copy of the Blackmage9 article (deleted from the dot dom page last January)? I'm planning to bring it back to life. -YellowZombieHater 08:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- (Replying to message left in my talkpage) Didn't notice it until now. Thanks for the heads up. -YellowZombieHater 12:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Juneius
roundbox templates
I remember them being used in other pages. Meant to redelete after I saw no transclusions. Sorry :/ You can redel --TKN 00:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
double redirects
oops, thanks. --zaiger (talk) 03:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Sup
Hey boss glad to see you're back on ED Stlson 04:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
shytt uu know me fine as a thick bitch with a round behind. I'll start working on articles asap Stlson 05:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
re:File:Grace_saunders_front.jpg
I honestly don't think so. I blame it on shenanigans. --zaiger (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Glad to see the seniors
Appreciate Pamella Geller's article. Let's update the pics in a rule 34 climate, as if she wasn't asking for it. Glad to see you and ED back! --Neurogeezer 04:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Template:Infoboxcompany
It really needs a border and a background color, like the one from TOW. Just look here. On a side note, don't you think frames are too thick? IMHO radius and borderstyle options should be removed, as nobody even uses them and one shouldn't really change anything besides the frame color and its content. --Gseed 16:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Unprotecting
HEY THERE! Hey, JuniusThaddeus/Archive1! I saw what you did with unprotecting pages where protection isn't needed. I just wanted to say keep up the good work. |
TKN 02:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Autoconfirm threshold is 1 day. — Preceding comment added by TKN (talk • contribs), 17:39, 20 June 2011
Anti Nazi
Re: "I been expecting to see your ugly, neo-Nazi face here eventually."
I'd like to begin by drawing everybodies attention to the poor grammar in your message.
Secondly, since when was ED censored by self styled "Anti Nazis"? Isn't that a slippery slope to nauseating monochrome political correctness? You seem like a hysterical libfag, whining about revenge and "hate" when I'm just here for the lulz. It's sad to see that you are scared to play with real fire. Couldn't I have had a day or two to unleash my comedy genius on the work in progress? Obviously not with libfag in chief on the case.
Thirdly, Nazis are generally much better looking than niggers, kikes, libfags, mutated dwarves, emos, ragheads, beaners and all the other degenerates that attend your depraved fuck parties.
Dismayed but hopeful, mikemikev London. P.S. If you ever fancy a hard sustained kicking, look me up, I'm not hard to find.
- Stop crying all over my page libfag. Don't you think I've had enough moralfaggotry rammed down my throat for now? Your opinion is that I made the page for "revenge". My opinion of my own brain is that I was trying to generate some lulz, and be informative. Guess who's right? It's sad that this funny site has been overrun with shrieking hysterical moralfags, delighted at the opportunity some admin tools give them to express anonymous "power" over their natural superiors without immediately receiving the hard, relentless kicking that they so rightfully deserve. I guess you are probably jewish. mikemikev
Redirect fixer
I'm not sure if we have the correct version of MadiaWiki, but isn't there a built in bot called "User:RedirectFixer" or something like that, that fixes double redirects automatically? Is that something that has to be enabled or did they do away with it? I ask you because you seem to know the most about MediaWiki around here :) --Zaig3r 13:56, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Seisatsu
HEY THERE! Hey, JuniusThaddeus/Archive1! I saw what you did with TachyonImpact. I just wanted to say keep up the good work. |
No name 05:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
banplz
please ban User:Bloodykisses--usar 00:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- little late sry --usar 00:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Andelin09
shit edits and articles. i've unblocked. H64 05:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- specifically leaving User:Andelin09/Chinasmack in mainspace for 2+ months. i sandboxed it but after reviewing their other abortions i banned them. H64 05:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- agree. i was patrolling special:newpages pretty hard (i cleared all non-patrolled pages that day) so i was being pretty prejudice H64 19:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed butthurt vandal
This shit is hilarious - Vinland 09:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Re:Main_Page
Yeah, I noticed that after I did it. Any reason he suddenly went BAWWWlistic? 13:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
apeshit vandalism
We have butthurt. - Vinland 22:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. Can you ban User:Lulzjew please? 22:31, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, bro. - Vinland 03:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Lulzjew vs. Lulzjew
Um...I don't see the difference. 23:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Plz ban this sockpuppet/vandal
User:Haters-gonna-hate-me: Sockpuppet of tsiago or whatever trying to prevent an article from being written about him Totensiediefurfag 23:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh, okay
Sorry, there have been so many vandal accounts created over the past few days I kind of assumed...Totensiediefurfag 23:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
July
Jesus...
BIG FUCKING MESS is an understatement, you're wading through the wreckage like a missionary to Haiti. What did TKN do, anyway? Totensiediefurfag 00:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey
HEY THERE! Hey, JuniusThaddeus/Archive1! I saw what you did with cleaning up TKN's Big Fucking Mess. I just wanted to say keep up the good work. |
01:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Wow
Holy shit you are doing an awesome job fixing that big fucking mess. Thank you so much. I don't know what we would do without you. I was just going to go through the history and copy and paste the page markup into their respective articles, but you are doing a much better job than I would have. Thanks again. --zaiger (talk) 02:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
YES
HEY THERE! Hey, JuniusThaddeus/Archive1! I saw what you did with fucking everything.. I just wanted to say keep up the good work. |
So what's the deal with TKN?
He's using a sockpuppet to claim he was hacked, right? Is he going to be unb&, or is he going to be told that it's his problem for not securing his account? Or is there no decision yet? Just wondering in case several articles relating to his sysop status need to be modified? Totensiediefurfag 19:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
locking uncreated articles
On the old wiki AOTN, POTN, VOTN and QOTN were locked so that only sysops could create them, I tried adding cascading protection on their parent pages but it didn't seem to work. Any ideas on how to fix this? --zaiger (talk) 04:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Gotcha
Thanks for clearing that up. Totensiediefurfag 11:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
: )
It's good to see you here, dear. Glenda Jackson 02:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Replied
And you should be good to go. Let me know if there are any problems.--MeetTheMedic 03:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
restoration
HEY THERE! Hey, JuniusThaddeus/Archive1! I saw what you did with having wiki kung fu skills. I just wanted to say keep up the good work. |
thx bro rats off to ya H64 06:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
preventing user-space / attack articles from being indexed by search engines
thats a grand idea, i dont have box access though so I cant edit the wiki conf. perhaps soon? H64 13:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure there's a magic word that prevents indexing on ALL our pages.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 14:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- I meant links aren't indexed, which I'm pretty sure is irrelevant to your post. Sorry. I need to learn to be silent.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 14:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Haha
Oh fuck, that is pretty bad. He's shitcanned, and all his edits are gone. Thanks for the heads up.--MeetTheMedic 15:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
concerns
- pomf =3 was originally an ed article, it has 4chanarchive links.
- both of those users represent the kind of idiots that should not be editing ed in the first place. the welcome message is more than enough.
- User:Nopeavi added misleading filename File:Moot.JPG and ALL CAPS SHIT EDIT.
- User:Hanna tried to label her garbage as policy.
H64 01:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, just me again, butting in. I believe lulztroll wrote pomf for both ED and OI. Here's his blog, it's the best way to contact him if you care if he cares.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 02:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
hi. why are you deleting pomf. that was an ed article. H64 22:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
HEY THERE! Hey, JuniusThaddeus/Archive1! I saw what you did with patrolling bans. I just wanted to say keep up the good work. |
H64 22:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Posting Dox
What are the rules on posting dox? I have noticed some people posting dox in the recent changes and haven't been sure whether to revert or not. In ED:101 all it says is dox is sometimes ok if they aren't underaged, If you want to see a specific example see Mewchan which first got my attention, thanks--Shika 02:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Ban Plz
Could you please ban this butthurt faggot and also delete this?--Typhoon 13:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Typhoon 13:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Duplicate Article
Could you please delete this article? It's a duplicate of the one with the capital L, I found it after people had trouble reading my edit to the other article. — Preceding comment added by CastleBravo (talk • contribs), 23:04, 4 July 2011
Thanks, and yeah I sometimes forget to sign my post. Sorry about that. --CastleBravo 14:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Nah it's not that I don't know about it, sometimes I just forget, though most of the time I eventually realize/notice it. I guess I'll get in shape once I'll be editing more around here. --CastleBravo 14:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Nothing to be sorry about on your end, I'm the retard who forgot to sign his post after all lol --CastleBravo 15:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete plz
Hey, plz to be deleting Nigga lover, which was made by this fag who doesn't realize that ED is not his high school. Totensiediefurfag 23:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
HAHAHA, DISREGARD THAT I SUCK COCKS Totensiediefurfag 23:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Banplz
User:Awwwwyeah for blanking the MCR Page, plzkthx Totensiediefurfag 17:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- EDIT: User:Axxe needs banning for the same reason Totensiediefurfag 17:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Totensiediefurfag 17:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Don't forget about these faggots:Category:Deathrow--Typhoon 17:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey...
Can you get User:Equivamp to stop edit warring over the Your Mom page? It's getting kind of ridiculous. Totensiediefurfag 05:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
This is not funny
Autism_macros I tried to make an article, knowing it's shit. — Preceding comment added by EmilyPlays (talk • contribs), 23:23, 8 July 2011
Pomf
I don't see why you flushed This version if it is drastically different than the OhI version. There are major differences, like different words and sentences, a "plot" section, teh fact that the meme is dead (ohI doesnt mention that), ED-speak (like at least 100, in the ass, etc), toilet humor, 4chanarchive links, and especially since I included the full doujin (the comic where Pomf originated). Can you at least compare the User:PresidentMudkip/Pomf =3 version with the OhInternet version. You will see that they are different from one another. Im only asking you a favor, dammit.
PræsidentMudkip 02:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
PS I think you should also archive your talk page. Its 32Kb long.
checkuser query
is there a way of purging checkuser info from the db that you know of? --zaiger (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- That works, thanks! --zaiger (talk) 23:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oh I didn't do anything, we just wanted to know if there was a way to get rid of some results. Shortening to length the db keeps them to 30 days will do fine. We really don't need to have them that long anyways. --zaiger (talk) 23:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Banplz
Plz ban User:Ownin2 for making exhibit B articles and removing baleetplz templates from them. Totensiediefurfag 22:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- kthx Totensiediefurfag 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
heres the latest version:
User:PresidentMudkip/Pomf =3 PræsidentMudkip 23:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Timeouts
Hey, I missed ya on IRC, sorry. I'm sure there's something I can do about it, will add it to the list. Good suggestion bro. Garrett 10:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Template:Creepypasta
I decided to request for this because this has been really bugging me lately. Why have the template on the page, but not the page on template? it's locked so I can't correct this, so I have come to the first admin I've found. Pages which need to be added:
If you can put these on the template then that would be wonderful. - Another n00b 00:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oh hey Wikichan also had some creepypasta articles, so this category could grow large. TyTalk 02:03, 3 September 2011 (CEST)
Hi
I seem to be out of the loop here. Can you please tell me what went on to encourage him to make the Mathsci article? 00:38, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
- I know very little about the race and intelligence case on TOW. My only communication with him was article building tips. 02:06, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
I tried leaving you an email but I got some sort of error. Is there some other way I can privately contact you (assuming you've no qualms coming into private contact with me)? It may not be wise to discuss it in public. And in case you were worried, no, I'm not propositioning you. And in the case you were excited, sorry, I'm not propositioning you. ;)
BTW, should I get a new sig?--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 05:16, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
- If I may butt in about the second part:
- Equivamptalk(Troll me here) 05:42, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
- Did you try clicking "email this user"? It's kind of on every userpage at the side. Just thought that might help. 05:55, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
- I did that. I received some sort of error. I'm not entirely incompetent.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talk • contribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 06:10, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
- Did you try clicking "email this user"? It's kind of on every userpage at the side. Just thought that might help. 05:55, 27 July 2011 (CEST)