- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Inciclopedia: Difference between revisions
imported>Maulsvalor No edit summary |
imported>Maulsvalor No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Who created this [[crap]]?? == | == Who created this [[crap]]?? == | ||
Inciclopedia is the epitome of [[unfunny]], just like Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically [[shitty]]. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like [[fail|"This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..."]] When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be [[fapping|doing something more constructive]]. | Inciclopedia is the epitome of [[unfunny]], just like actually Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically [[shitty]]. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like [[fail|"This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..."]] When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be [[fapping|doing something more constructive]]. | ||
But the [[Completely irrelevant history|big question remains]]: Who created Inciclopedia? | But the [[Completely irrelevant history|big question remains]]: Who created Inciclopedia? | ||
Revision as of 13:37, 11 November 2014
Inciclopedia is a Spanish version of Uncyclopedia, just too fucking long and a little more stupid. It's a bad, bad, bad site, a complete and utter failure. That's because Spain is the outhouse of Europe.
Since the articles are too damn long, even if you speak Spanish they will bore you to death. In fact, the sysops encourage you to write relentlessly; you may create the most perfect article, so to speak, but retard South American sysops will always bring invented pretexts hinting at standards it'll be immediately assraped.
Actually, Inciclopedia is so boring it doesn't inspire you to vandalize it. It kills any stimulation of the mind or emotions. Only the truly depraved or the jobless would do it. So go for it and profit.
At some point in 2008, Inciclopedia was in a net-war with Wikipediars, a kind of ED humor-styled Wikipedia from Chile. They hate each other but they are both crap. No one cared, obviously.
Who created this crap??
Inciclopedia is the epitome of unfunny, just like actually Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically shitty. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like "This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..." When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be doing something more constructive.
But the big question remains: Who created Inciclopedia?
- Maybe a Spaniard b user, trying to imitate Encyclopedia Dramatica and failing?
- Maybe an emo fag?
- The great pornographer?
- Some fugly chick?
- You?
- Or maybe a Spaniard Jew? (see above)
Interestingly enough, everyone knows spics and niggers don't have internets.
See also
External links
This article is crap. It deserves to be.
|
Inciclopedia is part of a series on Visit the Sites Portal for complete coverage. |