Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.

Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

2/10 Would Not Bang: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
< 2
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Oddguy
m ARCHIVING DEAD LINK.
Line 59: Line 59:
==External links==
==External links==
{{kym|memes/210-would-not-bang|2/10 Would Not Bang}}
{{kym|memes/210-would-not-bang|2/10 Would Not Bang}}
*[http://slacktory.com/2012/01/2-10-would-not-bang-4chan/ 2/10 Would Not Bang: 4chan’s Funniest New Meme] &bull; ''Slacktory.com (01/25/12)''
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20120128182527/http://slacktory.com/2012/01/2-10-would-not-bang-4chan/#disqus_thread 2/10 Would Not Bang: 4chan’s Funniest New Meme] &bull; ''Slacktory.com (01/25/12)''


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 02:29, 16 September 2025


2/10 Would Not Bang


2/10 Would Not Bang is an image macro series originating from 4chan in which photographs of unattractive women, in some instances men, are critically analysed and annotated with a view to highlighting their individual shortcomings.


[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]


10/10 Would Bang

10/10 Would Bang is a related image macro series however, rather than pointing out the failings in a subject it attempts to emphasize features which contribute to their overall level of attractiveness.


[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]


Would Not X

[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

2/10 Would Not Bang

See also

2/10 Would Not Bang is part of a series on

Memes

Visit the Memes Portal for complete coverage.