- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
User talk:Birthmother
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Welcome, Birthmother
This is serious. READ IT.
Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.
We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:
- Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
- To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
- Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
- These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
- The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
- Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
- Feeling social? Enjoy forums?
Join here. - See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.
SheepBotTalk PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO LEARN ABOUT THE JEWISH ATROCITIES AGAINST THIS NATION 01:35, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
YouTube Yahweh Clan
hello. writing yourself into an article is frowned upon. plz do not do that. -hipcrime 
01:46, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
- Am assuming Hip referred to this but considering that you were already mentioned in the article prior to your edits and you merely added links, I'd say you were just clarifying already present material. Although you seem to have replaced '69' with '909', was the former inaccurate? Docunting YT drama (which I could link to with P:Y but now I need to be all Portal:YouTube because of Hip, becomes harder nowadays with the new twitter-like format. Don't you just hate it? Also, can we converse on old drama likw NOWAY and such? TMTAE and Flockless and Troy and Violet and all that. Ty
c 04:34, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
- He's already been explained at in IRC what the deal was and knows what's going on. Also your template's broken. Mike the Great (talk) 04:46, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
- i believe i stated that edits to your article were up to others. i ended up having to edit your article anyway, because you keep revising it. yes, there is material still needed in that article, but you can not be trusted to add it. it is not your place to undo this editor's revision. the bronyship accord was breached. do not undo valid contribs to that article, including birthmother's contribs kthx -hipcrime 05:04, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
- I'm still under the impression that you revised the Accord after the fact to add what you said I breached, at the time I thought it pertained to single = headings and sub == spaces. It almost seems like a tease-accord. Some tolerance should be allowed for misunderstandings rather than accusing people of feigning ignorance. Tyc 05:22, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
- you may remain under that impression all you like. the bronyship accord was breached], and Birthmother's contribution is valid. besides, any treaty between you and me does not bar other editors from making valid edits. -hipcrime 10:48, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
- I'm simply responding to what you said: it is not your place to undo this editor's revision. the bronyship accord was breached. One could read that to imply that the breaching had something to do with my being unable to undo it. Since, as you said, the Accord only pertained to your changing the page, I'm not sure why it was brought up here. That said: you didn't specify whatever term I broke until after the fact, and were a bit underhanded by changing it to April 16 2011 instead of 2012, which is the natural assumption of meaning. Tyc 21:59, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
- I'm simply responding to what you said: it is not your place to undo this editor's revision. the bronyship accord was breached. One could read that to imply that the breaching had something to do with my being unable to undo it. Since, as you said, the Accord only pertained to your changing the page, I'm not sure why it was brought up here. That said: you didn't specify whatever term I broke until after the fact, and were a bit underhanded by changing it to April 16 2011 instead of 2012, which is the natural assumption of meaning. Ty
- you may remain under that impression all you like. the bronyship accord was breached], and Birthmother's contribution is valid. besides, any treaty between you and me does not bar other editors from making valid edits. -hipcrime
- I'm still under the impression that you revised the Accord after the fact to add what you said I breached, at the time I thought it pertained to single = headings and sub == spaces. It almost seems like a tease-accord. Some tolerance should be allowed for misunderstandings rather than accusing people of feigning ignorance. Ty
IRC
Sure I'll check for you when I'm on, usually on #wiki? Would like to reminisce. You're one of the few people I trust has the capacity to carry out that threat so I'll stay well warned and rely on sucking up in hopes of a receipt of merciful removals. Ty
c 21:59, 2 May 2012 (EDT)