Talk:Victorious/archive1

Could this be an article? Because I think it should. Bambifan101 21:39, 30 August 2012 (EDT)

Hello? Does anybody out there agree? Bambifan101 17:33, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

Hello? Bambifan101 18:43, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

Since no one listened to me, I started a stub that needs moar article. Thank you for your time. Bambifan101 21:41, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

- Mr Jonzz 22:02, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

this article

Needs to fucking die. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 22:54, 11 September 2012 (EDT)

+1 due to another bambifan shitpost with no internet relevance. Still needs consensus. Mike the Great (talk) 02:07, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

+1 for rollback to [[REDIRECT]] - Mr Jonzz 11:00, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

+1. no internets relevance. who watches TV anyway? -hipcrime 13:26, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

OK, you can always go back to the original redirect to iCarly. I just thought this might make a good article. But I guess somebody else should do it? Yeah, I suck at this, but Gravity Falls looks good now thanks to Gray. But one more question article: if it does go back to the redirect (which is likely right now), should it be with or without categories? Also, if it does stay, won't it need complete rewrite? I think the problem is no one cares about this article or most of my others (except GF, obviously), so if you don't want it, I think the redirect wasn't a bad idea. Bambifan101 17:30, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

Do you still think it would be better to go back to the redirect? Bambifan101 19:22, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

look at the article, count up the lulz, and you decide. you wrote it, you make the call. -hipcrime 19:56, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

• if you decide it should be redirected, and need help with that, drop me a note on my talk page, or here, and someone will do it. -hipcrime 20:01, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

lets check it   Andrés    talk    contribs   19:58, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

Possible Sources to Prove This Article's Worth

• http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=&section=&q=victorious
• http://4chandata.org/tv/VICTORIOUS-a6801
• http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/victorious

Bambifan101 18:02, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

Thats still unfunny. GO THE FUCK AWAY, NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR CHILDISH TASTES AT TV.   Andrés    talk    contribs   19:23, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

Possible sources to disprove the asinine concept that this article could ever be worth anything

• Kill yourself
• Shit nobody cares about
• ED is not

Mike the Great (talk) 19:46, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

Maybe

I think there is only one way for making this article be an actual article and kinda "good". We need someone to write smth better than the unfunny crap from bambifan and then spam it in a fan forum.   Andrés    talk    contribs   20:03, 12 September 2012 (EDT)

I asked Gray to do a complete rewrite, because nobody cares about the crap I originally wrote (yes, I admit it was crap, but it could be better if somebody good rewrites it). Bambifan101 17:25, 13 September 2012 (EDT)

I think I can improve the article enough to take it out of the deathnotice category. -Gray 17:38, 13 September 2012 (EDT)

Notes to self

• The Victorious Wiki mainpage has an entire section for favorite pairings, this is a good sign of pathetic fans.
• Gifs
• More gifs
• Confessions

-Gray 17:38, 13 September 2012 (EDT)

Since Mike the Great got blocked...

...and he told Gray not to write this article, does that mean Gray can write it now? I know my version was utter crap, but I think Gray could really make it look good. Bambifan101 21:18, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

• Don't fucking listen to anyone telling you what you can and cannot write about. If a sysop is abusing his privs like that agin tell me and I will take care of it ASAP. --zaiger (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

Well, his thoughts are still valid as anyone's, but if Gray can do something decent, of course.   Andrés    talk    contribs   21:19, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

• Mike getting raped was uncalled for. This article fucking sucks and if you're going to do it right, you need to add a bunch of teen jailbait pics. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 21:38, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

He blocked someone I was helping while I was helping him, and also he has NO RIGHT to tell people what they can and cannot write about. I am all set with having another jacknstock running around here thinking that this is their fucking wiki. I have told him this multiple times, am I just supposed to keep repeating myself? --zaiger (talk) 21:45, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

I didn't say that this article was any better than crap. I know it sucks. But right now it's a redirect to iCarly. But I was saying that when I asked Gray about it, he said he could at least get it out of the death notice category, but then Mike the Great told him to ignore me. Also I wasn't the one to block Mike. That was done by Zaiger. If you want him unblocked ask Zaiger; I'm not even an editor yet (and most likely never will be, if that makes you feel any better). Bambifan101 21:43, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

• I know you want to make it easier for new people to write articles... I just think the permanent ban is a bit much. Mike is a boss at wiki markup and is good for us. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 21:47, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

Nothing to do with making shit easier for new users. I told him not to move other user's articles (because it doesn't work. 99.999999999999999% of the time the article is never worked on again. We went through this on ED.com already like 3 years ago. Sysops are not to move articles to userspace. period. full stop.), and not to block this dude. He is purposefully trying to piss me off for whatever reason and I am not dealing with it. If he want to be unblocked/resysopped he can write me a heartfelt apology email. --zaiger (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

I don't really want an email --zaiger (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2012 (EDT)

To TylerRosenow, when I said the page was redirected to iCarly I forgot to recheck it and saw that Zaiger did restore the crap stub. But I wanted to ask Gray if he could do the complete rewrite that the current unfunny version desperately needs. Thanks. Bambifan101 19:44, 21 September 2012 (EDT)

• If it can be made into a workable article, that's fine. Gray is a good user. In the future, please try not to create a shitload of work for others, though. Articles are ideally loaded with lolz and internets. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 19:48, 21 September 2012 (EDT)