Talk:Silverhaze06

Why did someone put the lolcow board tempate in this article?

• ? oddguy 17:24, 17 February 2014 (EST)

• I deleted it in any case. He was not a part of 888chan as far as I know. oddguy 22:35, 17 February 2014 (EST)

stahp trying to one-up me on the history Gretchen 04:13, 18 February 2014 (EST)

p.s. I'm going to recommend this for good new articles and possibly AOTN, where do i do that, TJC? Gretchen 04:13, 18 February 2014 (EST)

• Snookums also wants to put in on AOTN... I'm going to sleep now but maybe this is a good idea... idk. oddguy 04:15, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Article of the Now suggestions go here. oddguy and I are also discussing things related to Silverhaze06 at the moment. ^reply 04:19, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Who summoned you? When did you become a part of this? Just curious. Gretchen 04:29, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Continue to be curious. ^reply 04:34, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Um actually no offense u know i luv u oddy, but I think your last addition kind of detracts from the conciseness or the article. Meaning, it's better without it. We already know Nate sock so hard it hurts. Gretchen 04:20, 18 February 2014 (EST)

This edit? It's fine. ^reply 04:25, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Who summoned you? When did you become a part of this? Just curious. lol are you actually reverting my edits on talk pages? Wow, hello schnookideus. Gretchen 04:29, 18 February 2014 (EST)

• Gretchen- If you mean the pictures in the #4 section, I added those for a reason. I wanted them to be conspicuous and attention grabbing. Why? Because this guy have been stalking this chick for several years now and I don't believe he is going to stop. However now, the next time he tries to do this on some other where people are perhaps less accustomed to this type of thing, he will fail right away because the moment they google him they will already know all his tricks. Plus if there are big pictures in the middle of an article people are more likely to read them to understand what they are about. oddguy 09:20, 18 February 2014 (EST)

• Oddy, no, there was a chunk of text in there that was really clunky I assume it was from you cuz you had the latest edit when i looked. Anyways it's gone now so whatever <3 Gretchen 14:19, 18 February 2014 (EST)

time to grammar nazi your shit

"graze the halls?" What country are you from? Good job though Gretchen 19:10, 17 February 2014 (EST)

stay out

Schnookums please don't fuck with this page if it has nothing to do with you and you're going to stop people from contributing --Likeicare 06:00, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Show me where I ever stated or hinted that I would "fuck with this page" or that "stop people from contributing"? As for "nothing to do with you" this is a wiki and nobody owns articles. The only thing I did was answer Gretchen's question and check with oddguy before deciding if this was going to be featured. Did you even bother to read the discussion? It doesn't sound like it. ^reply 06:15, 18 February 2014 (EST)

no, bite me --Likeicare 06:17, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Thank you. ^reply 06:22, 18 February 2014 (EST)

• How exactly is he going to "Stop people from contributing"? oddguy 09:10, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Lol schnookums you suck so hard. You're becoming just like onideus, sticking your nose in shit that has absolutely nothing to do with you and power-tripping on decent editors. Also lol, deleting posts on talk pages because someone is calling you out. Madhatter much? Gretchen 14:30, 18 February 2014 (EST)

(cur | prev) 09:41, 18 February 2014 Schnookums (Talk | contribs | rape) (2,775 bytes) (no, a duplicate comment was removed, read the summary please and stop trying to derail conversations) (undo) 

Learn to read summaries. ^reply 14:33, 18 February 2014 (EST)

So If I reply "Yes" or "No" to two different comments, is that also a duplicate post worthy of deletion?

I'm not sure what ~exactly~ makes you think you have the right to push people around over this article, aside from:

your single contribution compared to the hours that others have spent making this into a good article. ::Gretchen 14:43, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Hmm...Reminds me of someone else who would make up reasons to ban people for disagreeing and calling them on bullshit...

 — Preceding comment added by Gretchen (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

cry moar plz

• Mr.Jonzz 16:22, 18 February 2014 (EST)

give me a couple of hours, lads

I'm Nate's trainer (Maggot, if u don't know...) , and I have more lulzy info about him, from my original doxxing and from Lara. Give me a couple hours and I'll flesh out a bit more the article

On a side note, the image section about Lara sucks, it's pointless imho...if you, for some reason, want to keep it, there's way more funny pics to choose, besides that timestamped one, just saying...thoughs on the issue? --Chzoronzon 07:07, 18 February 2014 (EST)

The 20th is the next available Article of the Now slot available. I'm not going to feature it without the go ahead as I am sure this can of worms of still being opened. Also if you check oddguy's talk page, he is checking on some court documents I found online. ^reply 06:51, 18 February 2014 (EST)

>the image section about Lara sucks, it's pointless imho

You're talking about the Lara gallery just below Nathan I believe. Some drawings from EDF were added to Chris-Chan when his home burned down. I'm indifferent, if anything it could be merged with the Nathan gallery. ^reply 07:17, 18 February 2014 (EST)

• I say wait till Maggot says he's finished and then make it the AOTN. I seems a number of people want it to be there. For now we can just add it to the GNA. As far as the pictures of Lara- I say we should keep them. They don't contribure much but they don't make the article worse in any way. Unless you are talking about the nudes. About the images you removed Soonkums- I think it's okay to put them back since it was Nate who uploaded them online in the first place. We didn't stalk this information out of him, it was readily available online. oddguy 09:09, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Sounds good to me. ^reply 09:22, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Nice...I'll upload some lulzy pics of her...and I'm almost done with the text --Chzoronzon 09:57, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Done, at least from me...kept the Lara gallery, fleshed it a bit an removed unrelated to the article pics...what do u think?

About this being AOTN...I don't really think it's relevant enough outside our little circlejerk...but ey! if that makes ole Nate enter God-mode Sperg...I'm all ok with that, lol --Chzoronzon 11:31, 18 February 2014 (EST)

• Meh.... we gotta put something there. And there isn't anything better or more relevant anyway so... Why the hell not? oddguy 12:00, 18 February 2014 (EST)

Well, on my list is a furfag article. And I did put Adriel Hampton on the front page. So yes, why the hell not? ^reply 14:00, 18 February 2014 (EST)