Talk:Kotakoti

her dox

The site keeps erroring when I try to upload this picture so I'll just leave it here for someone else to do later [1]

I think I love you for this ^

--Starmilk 06:38, 7 January 2012 (CET)AW SHIT..!!, Dakota's mommy wont like that link you posted lol!

...what do you mean spam the talk page? uhhh am I doing this right?Pipluppip 06:26, 7 January 2012 (CET)

Well, you already know who I am. At any rate, I will feel physically sick if this article gets deleted. I spent too long digging up all the shit they tried to cover up only for it to be erased. ~~~~ the-eunja

Kind of. START SIGNING YOUR FUCKING POSTS so we know who is saying what. FOUR TILDES. ~~~~ TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 06:19, 7 January 2012 (CET)

--Starmilk 06:41, 7 January 2012 (CET)I think I'm doing this wrong. Anyway, it is fact at this point that Dakota has had a nose job. I actually had a conversation with her on IM the other night, she honestly do stay up THAT late, so the stories that anons have been telling us are in fact probably true. Dakota's deviated septum granted her a nice straight/pointed nose. Might as well fix everything while we're at it huh? In a sense I would assume Dakota think she's not lying when she says she hasnt had cosmetic surgery. She probably considers it as being a medical thing rather than something done for vanity purposes.

I think the thing that annoys me about this entire scenario is that they're actually winning. With the ED mod not recognizing properly who they are, it's proof that they're actually succeeding in their quest to bury all the shit they did and if this ED page gets removed then that's just another war they've won. In fact, the shittiest thing is that "they're" the reason that efagz is in lock down and won't open up it's membership, so it's not like I can even get on their to petition the members to try and keep this article, because I sure as hell know that they'd fight for it too. They actually know all their dirty little secrets and I can't even get on there goddamnit ~~~~ the-eunja

--Starmilk 06:51, 7 January 2012 (CET)We need more people to spam this. Honestly, if they win, all of Dakota's fan in Asia would think she's a complete angel. I truly want her oversea fans to see this page or at least hear about how she REALLY is.

--Starmilk 06:53, 7 January 2012 (CET)It is wrong that she is being featured on the news as well in Asia. It is only promoting and brainwashing teenagers to think that being THAT thin and "barbie" like is the only way to be likable. If this page is kept up, maybe her fans would see this and realize it is all fake and photoshop.

--Ichigomomomya 04:56, 1 October 2012 (EDT) Just added all the older images at the galleries at the bottom because leaving all images everywhere just looked messy besides some images were duplicates of ones that were already in the gallery.

Deletion Template

I removed the deletion template. Upon some web investigating, I've found that she is pretty much a popular retarded internet whore, and is fair game. Besides, the article is written and formatted as well as one could hope for. You may begin going to related articles and linking to Kotakoti where appropriate.TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 06:53, 7 January 2012 (CET)

Yay! Justice prevails! ~~~~ the-eunja

Just make sure it isn't orphaned. As it stands, this is how many pages on ED link to the article. You might want to insert the name into related articles such as Kiki Kannibal, Boxxy, other whore stuff, etc. Or else it will never get the exposure you feel it deserves. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 07:01, 7 January 2012 (CET)

Got it. I've been meaning to revamp Kiki Kannibals page actually. At the moment Dakotas has more shit and Kiki was 10x the attention whore. ~~~~ the-eunja

The-eunja

Hey there, i don't know if you noticed but i moved those pictures to the gallery, there was a very large gap in the article and it looked messy. Not trying to start an edit war, just collaborating on what i see as a good article that needs some slight adjustments. I made those same edits again, if you think my changes are unreasonable please tell me why here, instead of mindless reversion, and i might see your point of view. Elvis 02:00, 8 January 2012 (CET)

I keep reverting the changes because the whole Dakota Ostrenga drama was started on the basis of those 3 images that I've placed directly to the right of the page. I can see that whenever you make the changes, it replaces those images of the picture of Dakota from the profile view. As lulzy as the whole nosejob drama is, it's still based on flimsy speculation that we've yet to officially confirm (though I do believe she has had Rhinoplasty) and I don't think it's right to replace the image that first highlighted her existence with another that makes absolutely no sense to people who are new to the article. It's also just a case of keeping the article consistent, as the article begins by first discussing her Photoshopping antics and then moving onto the possibility of said nosejob later. I can't actually see the gap in the page that you mentioned either. It may just be me but it could also be your browser, unless you can point it out to me? ~~~~ the-eunja

I've already given my reason for wanting to keep the article the way it is, and you keep trying to screw it up anyway. I personally can't see any gap, I can't see any problems and you've just removed the changes I made to the layout I made earlier. If you keep doing this, you're going to end up with a ban for fucking up somebody elses article.  — Preceding comment added by The-eunja (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

Tru dat ^ ~~~~ the-eunja

I checked with some people and it we think that the big fuckin' gap only appears if you are using google chrome. I see you got mad because CreativeUsername reverted you after you gave a reasonable reason, but don't threaten other people with bans, it just makes you look foolish. Anyways, i added this to the Good New Article section because i do actually think it deserves it. -- Elvis 18:34, 10 January 2012 (CET)

--Starmilk 10:06, 12 January 2012 (CET)I used Firefox and I saw the gap...I dont think it's just Google chrome.

Can somebody please screenshot said gap, cause I can't see shit captain. If there is a gap then I'd like to fix it but I just can't see it ~~~~ the-eunja

I delicately highlighted the specific area.

Elvis 01:03, 13 January 2012 (CET)

Okay guys, that is definitely an issue with your browser as this is what it appears as for me, my family and all my friends. ~~~~ the-eunja

Ixioii

If you guys are going to post the Dox picture you should at least remove her address, that ain't right. - Ixioii

• Dox stay. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 01:45, 18 January 2012 (CET)

Why the fuck

Is everything center aligned. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 00:55, 9 February 2012 (EST)

videos removed because of copyright claim by the kkk

Anyone have backups? We can host them here where we can guarantee they won't be tos'd (because she doesn't own copyright on a screen capture taken by someone else). --zaiger (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2012 (EDT)

Kotakoti...

...needs to drank moar bleach. - Mr Jonzz 11:29, 16 October 2012 (EDT)

Recent changes

What the hell is going on at the bottom of the page? It is written like the forum post of a 13 yo blogger.

--Ichigomomomya 12:27, 27 May 2013 (EDT)

Why?

Did something happen recently or something to make her relevant again? If so why isn't it in the page? Why is this old-news on the main page when we literally have dozens of new articles that are front-page news? --Mantequilla (talk) 22:46, 11 June 2015 (EDT)

• This is the second or third most viewed article on the site that's about a person. I figured it's a waste to never have it on the front page. oddguy 03:37, 12 June 2015 (EDT)