Talk:Furfag: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
imported>Deadpriest
No edit summary
Hypeshot (talk | contribs)
183 edits
(No difference)

Revision as of 06:22, 4 July 2024

This could be a good addition, but it is in a weird format. From the ren and stimpy animator. http://www.cartoonthrills.com/blog/AdultSwim/Furries/Furries_H264_halfRez.mov --Dang 02:57, 25 February 2014 (EST)


Furries didn't get the 200M get, it was a pokemon... Arguecat 09:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

why do you have to be so mean, furies are just normal people like you and me. sure some of it is weird and disgusting, but respect peoples beliefs. let them dream. ok the people who blanked the page are probably all wierdos, but you dont have to be a bully. and please get rid of the pics. -Krystal --  — Preceding comment added by foxy92 (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

You do realize this is a satirical wiki, right? It's furries like you that don't get that and give the rest of us a bad name. Equivamp 14:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
And that this entire site is the same. Relax, and take these things with a grain of salt. --Ghostgaff 05:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Was that directed at me? Equivamp 05:14, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
No, directed at foxy 92. I am agreeing with you. Sorry for any confusion.--Ghostgaff 05:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Lol Foxy c'mon brosky. If the page offends the party in question, you know it was well written. Reeses 01:45, 23 January 2012 (CET)

What is this I don't even

LOL, since when do we have to respect people's beliefs in the first place? If you're talking about tolerance, remember that tolerance means you TOLERATE people's beliefs, not accept or respect them. And if you're talking about freedom of speech, doesn't that same right cover what people say against furries as well? And since when is a sexual fetish a belief in the first place? Oh, and "Krystal", please remember to sign your posts.

Tl;dr: Go BAWWWWWWWWWW to people who want to hear it. Danieltepeskraus USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST 05:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

lmao, even I don't want to hear it. You won't find much sympathy here, not even amongst furries. Equivamp 13:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Butthurt furries

Those furries are so butthurt today, trying to blank this page. I'm glad it's restored. Better keep a close eye on this page. You may never know furries will strike again. Ivo Robotnik: SnooPING AS usual I see! 21:10, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Semi-Related to Comments Above

Okay, in all seriousness, anyone that comes to this site and thinks anything here is meant to be taken as gospel should be beaten with a truncheon mercilessly. If you feel: butthurt, furious, frustrated, etc after reading this article, you're one of the furries that ruins the rest of the fandom and gets the semi-normal few of us bitched at. Please go fuck off and die. Also, ED, keep up the humour. I'm loving this. I've never laughed harder in my life. IrksomeReturn 05:38, 22 September 2011 (CEST)

I take ED as gospel … quit criticising my beliefs! – NuclearDuckie 12:55, 7 January 2012 (CET)

Nice Trolling

Bloody funny haven't laughed that hard in ages, spec on the bit about becoming infected. Brilliantly tallented trolling User:Thespartanpenguin 09:31 GMT 14/11/2011

I don't understand

Everything on this page is true and accurate. Whats all this nonsense about "just playing around"? Just because ED criticizes something doesn't mean we're secretly OK with it. Purge the unclean. Juggerbot 20:09, 10 April 2012 (EDT)

Featherfaggotry

I have noticed that we have a multitude of pages already on the furfaggotry subject, but I believe there are some pieces of information left out that could still be milked if we all contribute. We already have pages on furfags, scalies, wolfaboos, but why have the featherfags been left out? I'm still new at these wiki-editing shenanigans, so I might not make that good of a page or article on my own. I've had experiences with featherfags in the past, and I know it's easy to get them angry by mentioning how birds don't have human genitalia, how they look stupid when made to look like they only have colored shiny skin instead of feathers (this goes for furries and lack of actual fur on their characters as well), telling them that birds have different feet from humans (usually it can be found that they are drawn with human feet, just colored differently), etc., etc. This could open up to be something great as featherfags have not been touched upon all that much on the internet, seemingly going along their ways scot-free. --TheDOSFag 16:22, 17 March 2015 (EDT)

Opening and "Girl Furries"

Since folks get touchy with this article, I'll bring this up on the talk page first. First, regarding a sentence from the opening: "They are the absolute bottom of the internet food chain, somewhere near Otherkin in ranks of patheticness." Other ED articles claim otherwise. I think it should read something like, "They are near the bottom of the Internet food chain, probably ranking above Otherkin and bronies (both lesser kin to furries), Chris-chan, and definitely above you." or something like that.

Also, the section "Girl" Furries I think needs editing. It makes the claim "there are no female furries" but the section itself shows that there are. A browse through Category:Furfaggotry shows more: Abigaille, Aquagirlwhitefox, BleedingFireWolf, Kamilya, Kimberleigh Ann Keister, Lucky Coyote, MicahFennec, Selucilia, Vixen T. Fox, Zeriara, and more. It's a bold claim to make a weak joke and it doesn't hold up under a moment's scrutiny. I'd rather the whole section's text be purged and its gallery worked into the others in the article. If not, then the text should be reworded. I don't have a strong alternative, maybe something like "There are female furries out there. Even one who is not ugly, a drama llama, and/or insane will still be a furry. Watch out for traps."

Any objections? Lulzist 19:01, 19 December 2012 (EST)

ED is contradictory? Say it ain't so! I don't care one way or the other, fuck this article. - Mr.Jonzz 19:09, 19 December 2012 (EST)
Load video
YouTube

Don't ask. --Big Nig 21:19, 30 December 2012 (EST)

Fan Animooted Furry Chit

Is there any good stuff out there? I mean besides [Ryanide]. I know there's plenty of ~bad~ stuff, like that Balto rip-off project that's been idling for a decade or so, but I'm wondering if there's any other halfway decent/interesting stoofs about. --Onideus 22:43, 22 February 2013 (EST)

Juco is working on a hush-hush long term project. There's also the Cat Piano, but I dunoo if that was geared toward / made by us, though. ~Poolboy 11:15, 11 April 2013 (EDT)

Furfag is part of a series on

Furfaggotry

Visit the Furfaggotry Portal for complete coverage.

I didn't know where to put this

I found this is in the shoutbox, written by skarvika. I thought it's pretty good. I just didn't know where to place it.


Living in a prison of shame, dueto the fact that their sick mentally deficient brain is too twisted to comprehend that the natural way of life is to breed with your own species, and that they, by fucking another species, are in reality, holding their own species as an entirety back from progress, the furry bands together with more sick fucks like themselves in order to feel like they're not wastes of life after all!


--Killerratte 14:43, 4 January 2014 (EST)

Furtard Link Removals

Is there any way to quickly aggregate all the links that were ever put into the external link section (and later removed)? Some "clever" furtards have apparently just been REMOVING links that they deem as "broken" rather than actually taking 10 seconds of effort to find an alternative source (or at least cross it out and LEAVE IT IN so someone else can). I'm presuming they're doing it on purpose to try and hide shit. People might be doing this to other articles as well. --U Mad Bro 23:04, 11 January 2015 (EST)

Image links too apparently...

baleeted missing About missing Pics
[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]


All that is just from TWO EDITS! Someone probably needs to trace back through this entire article's history. --U Mad Bro 23:14, 11 January 2015 (EST)

Someone should. —  VX  00:03, 12 January 2015 (EST)

just

lol, waste of carbon.

Retrieved from "http://edramatica.com/index.php?title=Talk:Furfag&oldid=1875097"