Talk:Baphomet

This article will need more pictures. A history of the board as well as some of the things they've done would also be nice. Akesgeroth 22:34, 1 February 2015 (EST)

lol /baph/ is gone in the most hilarious way ever

• Check the article. oddguy 05:36, 13 February 2015 (EST)

Good, the board was filled with nothing but try-hard script kiddies with an unwarranted sense of self-importance and self-proclaimed "oldfags"-- The INSUFFERABLE Tim 12:19, 13 February 2015 (UTS)

• I liked them. It was like /b/ before fun was banned. oddguy 07:04, 13 February 2015 (EST)

mfw the portion about me isn't even true

>bapho lolcows so BTFO they had to make something about me on ED

i mine as well get my own article at this point. --Swamiwammiloo 12:22, 18 February 2015 (EST)

--Ezstick76 12:26, 18 February 2015 (EST)

this just in ur gay lmao rekt --Swamiwammiloo 12:30, 18 February 2015 (EST)

ever heard of using : to space out your message?--Ezstick76 12:33, 18 February 2015 (EST)

ever heard of not being dum

BTFO --Swamiwammiloo 12:37, 18 February 2015 (EST)

I have heard of not being dumb but not "dum". Is that what they call your species swam?--Ezstick76 12:39, 18 February 2015 (EST)

• I have no idea who's writing this or what he is basing this on. I (and everyone else) assumed what he's saying is true and didn't double check. But unless someone cares enough to do that I doubt the articles are changed. oddguy 12:46, 18 February 2015 (EST)

did you also notice that Swami is being a fail troll right now?--Ezstick76 12:50, 18 February 2015 (EST)

• Pretty funny imo. oddguy 13:00, 18 February 2015 (EST)

ur mum is pretty bunney xD --Swamiwammiloo 17:30, 18 February 2015 (EST)

I am pretty sure your mom is a bunny you furfag--Ezstick76 18:13, 18 February 2015 (EST)

pretty sure ur face is a furfag --Swamiwammiloo 19:27, 18 February 2015 (EST)

what kind of insult was that?--Ezstick76 19:36, 18 February 2015 (EST)

the one that rekts you --Swamiwammiloo 20:21, 18 February 2015 (EST)

oh yeah I was so rekt, hold on let me go shoot my self in the foot cause you are soooo good--Ezstick76 21:00, 18 February 2015 (EST)

do it no balls --Swamiwammiloo 21:56, 18 February 2015 (EST)

oh how wonderful it is to see someone fall victim to bad sarcasm--Ezstick76

To the authors of this article

I feel this shizz deserves a front page feature. How much more time and work is needed to finish it? Vermin    10:46, 22 February 2015 (EST)

• I would guess - a lot. Right now it's mostly just blocks of text. I made some small edits to make it not shit when it just started, but it looks like people have been edit-warring over it ever since. I agree that this is front page material once someone pretties it up (not me because I don't know enough about this) and also provides a link to wherever they moved after they shut down on 8chan. oddguy 11:14, 22 February 2015 (EST)

Right, I'm not a channer myself, never have been, so I'm gonna keep my input out of this one. Hopefully they can call an editing truce and get it finished so we can display their work to the internet world. Vermin    11:19, 22 February 2015 (EST)

This article is riding /baphomet/'s dick too hard. Surly these "oldfags" can take being insulted by an encyclopedia dramatica article? FriendlyDad7

• Yeah, it's getting a bit out of hand. At first I made a short, but positive article. But now it seems it has been taken over by sycophants. oddguy 10:03, 24 February 2015 (EST)

I created the original article and I left it small and simple since I'm not overly familiar with the board's history. Though I like that someone with better knowledge of it made it much bigger, I agree it might as well be named "fellatio.txt". The "history" sections need to be rewritten by someone who's not using baph's dick as a lollypop. Akesgeroth 08:17, 25 February 2015 (EST)

Yesh, I for one will not be front-paging an article which praises its subject. It needs to be written to be completely satirical, and all satire by definition is critical. Irony may be a form of satire, but its still used to criticize the subject, not write the article from an ironically kind vantage point. Vermin    10:04, 25 February 2015 (EST)

>a shitty article full of misinformation and pro-bapho-lolcow dickriding deserves a front page mention

i have browsed ED since 2009 and watched stoopid stuff like weev going to jail or girlvynl making ohinternet and in regards to this article

there's a reason why nobody cares about baphomet here on 8chan- it's because they act like oldfags when in reality they're newfags who've just read websites on old 4chan / ED articles relating to old 4chan. they just sound like they're parroting a lot of what the 'oldfags' did and said back then, and it's painfully obvious. the pro-baph slant on the article is evidence enough that they're interesting in being such le oldfags with such a le epic ED article and that they're actually newfags who don't understand ED, annnd

hotwheels and i are convinced the owner of baphomet is an fbi agent / dumb criminal and that the board is a honeypot. he voiced similar things in regards to baphomet being newfag parrots interested in efame rather than lulz

dunno just my two cents

keep putting pressure on them, they can't handle the ED bantz and i regularly troll them because it's fun --Swamiwammiloo 20:30, 25 February 2015 (EST)

Yeah, this idiotic kid^ has a point...would true hardcore l33t oldfags allow/promote such a detailed article, almost a log, on their shit? Lol and popcorn.--Chzoronzon 19:17, 10 March 2015 (EDT)

• I think this article is a pile of shit but none of us know enough about this to correct it. I think most of it is done by one guy who's been editing this + the 8chan article every day because he's a fucking fanboy. oddguy 05:32, 11 March 2015 (EDT)

I might know enough, I just don't give a shit. Also it is hard to keep up with the autism of baphtards. CobaltCat 07:22, 11 March 2015 (EDT)

• It's probably just a board mod (or the board owner himself) commiting shameless self-promotion. Baphomet is hardly relevant anymore on 8ch. The INSUFFERABLE Tim 07:27, 11 March 2015 (EDT)

Could we just nuke the fucking thing back to what I originally created and restart from there? Maybe keep the current version somewhere as a reference. Akesgeroth 22:56, 12 March 2015 (EDT)

A few fixes

1. Eclipso isn't a mod.

2. In that (fucking hilarious) picture you made of the mod structure: who's Eric? It's not consistent with the article.

3. Tone isn't consistent. Do you hate /baphomet/, or like it? Probably should be rewritten.

--Vince 15:45, 13 March 2015 (EDT)

You seem to think this article was written by a single person. Basically, it was overtaken by a baph fanboy. He was allowed to do what he wanted at first since no one really cares enough about baph to do research on it so we thought he could make it into more than a stub but then we forgot trusting a self-engrossed fucktard with describing something that makes him feel important is a bad idea and he turned the article into some sort of shrine. The whole thing needs to be redone IMHO. Akesgeroth 22:25, 15 March 2015 (EDT)