Talk:GTA Myths Wiki

removed deathnotice

We've got a lot of crap so I'm unsure what is so bad about this. It is definately a {{crapstub}}. This article hasn't been around for long either. Maybe the wiki will become popular and someone will take interested in the article. I did remove the members section because it was gay. ^reply 18:54, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

• SeeBeen put the death notice in place because it really is just a shitty, unfunny attack article. Don't know if you followed all the events around this particular article last week, but it was clear someone had a grudge against this site and was trying to use ED as their personal army. Talk | Contribs 20:22, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

Yeah, so instead of complaining about the shitty article, why not improve it? It doesn't matter what someone's motives are, we're here to document internet drama. ^reply 20:29, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

I don't know why we're so obsessed with deleting articles when we can be improving them. Have a look at the Alamo section on my userpage. Each time someone gripes an article needs to be deleted and then I prove it really isn't hard to improve an article. At the moment, I've got a shitload of other crap to do for the wiki, but if needed then I'll add another article my alamo to prove how silly this is. ^reply 20:34, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

• Because at some point some goddamned quality control needs to be enforced, and having already looked at the site in question there's nothing funny going on there to document; hell there's barely any activity. If we're no longer going to bother with that then we may as well flush all the death notice templates. If you have a problem with the deathnotice then take it up with SeeBeen since he's the one who put it there in the first place. Talk | Contribs 22:49, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

I removed the deathnotice. If needed move the article to my userspace so we can stop obsessing over something in the mainspace that isn't hurting anyone. ^reply 20:38, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

getting sick of constant deathnotice

This article has pissed off some people enough to bitch. If you think there is a result better than that, I'd like to hear. —  VX  00:32, 5 April 2015 (EDT)

I was contacted on my talk page about redeleting this, since I did so before until SeeBeen overturned me and said not to remove it again unless it's been deathnoticed for over a week. I've been told it was death noticed for over a week, but I see no notice, and I'm kinda neutral on the current article, which I don't really consider lulzy, but I'm not going out of my way to remove it unless anyone else believes it needs to die. DarkLordTR --> 23:26, 7 April 2015 (EDT)

Looks pretty fine to me. ••General Niggerson 06:54, 8 April 2015 (EDT)