Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Neutral point of view

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>Dildo Baggins at 03:31, 13 May 2011. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neutral Point of View means being unbiased in everything you say. For instance, this article is being completely unbiased right now, unlike all those goddamn liberal motherfuckers who all are smelly hippies and baby killers. They are never unbiased.

Fox News definitely uses a NPOV. I mean, they constantly remind us that they’re “fair and balanced”, so they must be telling the truth. Fox News would nevar lie.

Many use the 'Some argue...' phrase before their statement to conveniently bypass NPOV.

tl;dr: NPOV = the polar opposite of wikipedia

A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman

Neutral point of view sucks ok.
Nobody ever comes to the internet with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to spout off okay? So this bullshit about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more stupid is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so

STFU[1]HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

See Also

Neutral point of view is part of a series on

Wikipedia

Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.