Neutral point of view

Neutral Point of View means being unbiased in everything you say. Your point of view should be neutral on the topic and should never say anything which could slander the subject in any way. Wikipedians can bypass this by adding a "Controversy" title and softly slagging it off with formal, unbiased sentences, while including evidence of said controversy.

In fact, this article is being completely unbiased right now, unlike all those goddamn liberal motherfuckers who all are smelly hippies and baby killers. They are never unbiased.

Other uses of NPOV

Fox News definitely uses a NPOV. They constantly remind us that they’re “fair and balanced”, so they must be telling the truth. Fox News would nevar lie, not at all.

A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman

Neutral point of view sucks ok.
Nobody ever comes to the internet with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to spout off okay? So this bullshit about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more stupid is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so

STFU

See Also

• Wikipedese
• Attack
• ED Is Not
• ALL CAPS

Neutral point of view is part of a series on Wikipedia Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.