Talk:Nef Quintero

New Material

This is all new stuff I just made, primarily from his Twitter account. I'll add in the stuff that everybody's probably already seen next, although reformatted and cleaned up a bit. Working on that now. I'm guessing the only reason a page wasn't made for him sooner was the lack of content, especially after the 4Chan kiddies scared him off and he locked down his FB and MySpace accounts. As a result getting stuff to make a page has been difficult to say the least. --Onideus 07:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Old Material

First batch is up. There's actually a second batch too that I'm sorting through now. I went and cherry picked through his entire Twitter account and got a bunch of really hilarious quotes. Not sure yet if I'll just leave them as images or type them out into an actual quotations template...probably the later though. Hoping to try and get as much of this done as I can tonight, along with an intro paragraph or two. --Onideus 09:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Looks Like He Found His Article!

First he tried to add the "blatant attack article" template and then tried changing it around to the "crap" template. *snicker* I think it's definetly him though, just look at his user talk page, where apparently he was trying to upload images...again...and again...and again...LOL, certainly sounds like the kid. --Onideus 01:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Link to his userpage? 01:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Right nyah: http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/User:Abkiza

Somebody already put a faggot template on it...I can only imagine as to why. LOL --Onideus 01:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

LOL, actually I think he put it on there himself. I just assumed it was the person asking him why he kept trying to upload the same image over and over and over again. --Onideus 01:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

^It's the truth, I put that there. Look at the edit history. Also, this is a crap article Abkiza 09:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Uh huh, right. Free cl00 dipshit, most of the material on the page isn't mine, I just collected it from various sites, compiled it together and cleaned it up. Most of it comes from 4chan threads and the Facebook Troll site. Speaking of the later, a great deal of their material is ported over to ED these days, they really do an outstanding job of documenting and tracking Facebook related lulz. I never actually directly engaged with the little fruit loop at all, didn't even know about it until after the fact and after he had locked everything down (due to over-trolling from 4chan kiddies). So it's obviously not an attack article (although any idiot could tell you that just by looking at it) and it's obviously not crap either considering the majority of the material is coming from OTHER lulz related sites who felt it was more than good enough to publish and write articles about. Keep lying though, Nef, everyone knows it's you, who the hell else would want to deface or get this article taken down? LOL --Onideus 19:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

^^^^ Yes, you create a crap article based on a faggot, and then get pissy if someone else thinks it is crap. Obviously I'm not trying to deface it, or I would have.... actually defaced it. If anything you're "Nef Quintero" seeing as you seem to care about him so much. Also, I'm a wikinoob. As you pointed out in the op, that's more than obvious.Abkiza 21:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Tell us about your l33t iPod hax0ring Neffy! :D

PS - Did you post comments on the Facebook Troll site telling them it was crap too? LOL

*slowly licks the salty buttery tears of butthurt streaming down yer fat lil butterball cheeks*

--Onideus 22:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Just because I called your article crap doesn't mean you should accuse me of being the subject.Abkiza 23:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

So why don't you use your super l33t hax0ring skillz and make me stop, Neffy. LOL --Onideus 07:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Article History

Another person already attempted to shit can this article, their edits were reverted (not by me) and it was discussed at the time. Although I put the article together, the article technically is *NOT* mine, it actually originally came from 4Chan and The FaceBook Troll site, I simply took their materials, added a few new ones and ~viola~ a fun article. Obviously it's not just my own opinion seeing as how the images in the article had already been mass distributed hundreds of thousands of times over for nearly a YEAR before I ever even got around to putting it together in an article. I suspect the attempts to shit can the article are simply coming from butthurt kiddies who have some kind of a personal problem with me. --Onideus 07:13, 11 January 2012 (CET)

Also, as far as relevance, a search for the name Nef Quintero brings up over 24,000 results and he's been featured on FaceBook Troll, Reddit, Hack Forums, 4Chan (especially in /g/), plus dozens of other sites, blogs, etc. Most of the images have likewise been mass circulated on FaceBook with thousands of shares. Honestly, if you haven't ever heard of this guy you must not get out much on the grid, because his clueless idiocy is practically legendary, especially in hacking/technology related groups. --Onideus 07:19, 11 January 2012 (CET)

• That doesn't change the fact that the article in its current state isn't very good. You have the source code. Reformat it in your userspace; I am WILLING to work with you on it. That's all I can tell you. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 07:23, 11 January 2012 (CET)

Sorry to burst your power trip, but you have zero authority to tell him what he can and cannot work on or where he can work on it. Pull this shit again and you are a normal user again. --zaiger (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2012 (CET)

• It's "not good"...because...

I'll ask Zaiger if he can fix it again, I believe he banned the first idiot who put the crap stub on it. And that may be why the second user who put the crap stub on it also got banned...or they were doing it to other article too...not sure. If you think that it can be improved in some way, by all means, have at it, or at least be more specific about what you think is "not good", because that's incredibly vague and honestly, you've been churning out messages so fast I know you haven't even ~looked~ at any of the content on the article, which is just downright hysterical (hence the reason it's been continually reposted pretty much everywhere). --Onideus 07:33, 11 January 2012 (CET)

Work on it where ever you want. The subject matter is funny. If someone tries to pull that shit again with you just email me. --zaiger (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2012 (CET)