Talk:Whirled

:I Is this article in good standing?

It sounds like a good article, but the way it's put down is more of an attack article, an NYPA. Perhaps a rewrite to make it sound less of an attack article and more of a drama article? --CinoxFellpyre 03:41, 8 December 2011 (CET)

I believe that it's Coverage Can, Cause a lolercoaster But, it needs more pictures And, videos. But, In all I would say that it is a good article!

(Leave a message) (My contributions) 04:51, 8 December 2011 (CET)

Well template:nobodies pretty much covers the "who to hack" section of this article and tends to draw a lot of unwanted edits, and instating a "Don't put them up here unless there's documented drama" strategy is pointless because people don't pay attention and just want to put in some people they personally dislike. In the Xat article they had a similar set-up with a huge list of users but it was hands down due for removal due to not being able to actually do anything with a user name. On this page I guess you have account links and things to cause drama which would definitely fall under our scope. Maybe I'll go through and whittle the list down and take out all the stupid fucking pipes. Mike the Græt (Talk) 21:33, 25 February 2012 (EST)

As I go to the talkpage, I see 80% of the edits point to the "Troll these people I don't like" section. Yup yup. Sure makes you wonder who edits this page. Zyklon 17:54, 30 August 2012 (EDT)