Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Neutral point of view: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
imported>Dildo Baggins
changing .com to .ch
imported>Zenihd Rol
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Neutral Point of View''' means being unbiased in everything you say. [[Derp|Your point of view should be neutral on the topic]] and should never say anything which could slander the subject in any way. [[Wikipedia]]ns can bypass this by adding a "Controversy" title and softly slagging it off with formal, unbiased sentences, while including evidence of said controversy.


'''Neutral Point of View''' means being unbiased in everything you say. For instance, this article is being completely unbiased right now, unlike all those goddamn [[liberal]] motherfuckers who all are smelly [[hippy|hippies]] and [[dead babies|baby killers]]. They are never unbiased.
In fact, this article is being completely unbiased right now, unlike all those goddamn [[liberal]] motherfuckers who all are smelly [[hippy|hippies]] and [[dead babies|baby killers]]. They are never unbiased.


[[Fox News]] definitely uses a NPOV. I mean, they constantly remind us that they’re “[[Lie|fair and balanced]]”, so they must be telling the [[Bullshit|truth]]. Fox News would [[nevar]] lie.
==Other uses of NPOV==
 
[[Fox News]] definitely uses a NPOV. They constantly remind us that they’re “[[Lie|fair and balanced]]”, so they must be telling the [[Bullshit|truth]]. Fox News would [[nevar]] lie, not at all.
Many use the ''' '[[Some argue]]...' ''' phrase before their statement to conveniently bypass NPOV.
 
tl;dr: NPOV = the polar opposite of [[wikipedia]]


== [[Shit nobody cares about|A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman]] ==
== [[Shit nobody cares about|A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman]] ==
Line 12: Line 10:
Nobody ever comes to the [[internet]] with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to [[cum|spout]] off okay? So this [[bullshit]] about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more [[stupid]] is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so</div>
Nobody ever comes to the [[internet]] with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to [[cum|spout]] off okay? So this [[bullshit]] about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more [[stupid]] is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so</div>


<BIG><BIG><BIG>[[STFU]]</BIG></BIG></BIG>[http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&diff=11814&oldid=11761]</s><BIG><BIG><BIG>HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS</BIG></BIG></BIG>
<big>'''[http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&diff=11814&oldid=11761 STFU]'''</big>


== See Also ==
== See Also ==

Revision as of 17:52, 8 August 2011

Neutral Point of View means being unbiased in everything you say. Your point of view should be neutral on the topic and should never say anything which could slander the subject in any way. Wikipedians can bypass this by adding a "Controversy" title and softly slagging it off with formal, unbiased sentences, while including evidence of said controversy.

In fact, this article is being completely unbiased right now, unlike all those goddamn liberal motherfuckers who all are smelly hippies and baby killers. They are never unbiased.

Other uses of NPOV

Fox News definitely uses a NPOV. They constantly remind us that they’re “fair and balanced”, so they must be telling the truth. Fox News would nevar lie, not at all.

A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman

Neutral point of view sucks ok.
Nobody ever comes to the internet with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to spout off okay? So this bullshit about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more stupid is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so

STFU

See Also

Neutral point of view is part of a series on

Wikipedia

Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.

Retrieved from "http://edramatica.com/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&oldid=401550"