Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

LOGIC AND REASON: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Owl
No edit summary
imported>Owl
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== Or, "I don't know the difference between humans and robots." ==
== Or, "I don't know the difference between humans and robots." ==


Sometime within the past few years, a couple of [[lazy|misunderstood]] [[I_have_a_140_IQ|geniuses]] decided that Enlightenment philosophy had gone out of vogue 250 years too early. Instead of subscribing to the overwhelmingly-held view that people perceive the world differently, they concluded that there was absolute truth to everything. Conveniently, these absolute truths matched up with the viewpoints that these [[misogyny|brilliant]] [[eugenics|minds]] [[atheism|already]] [[Marxism|held]]. According to these individuals, the only way to see the world ~clearly~ is with the help of [[bullshit|empirical science]] and, of course, Logic and Reason- emotion be damned. Never mind the [[fact]] that human emotion and intuition are [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262603002859 necessary for effective decision-making]; so much as suggesting this to a Logic and Reason devotee will cause their chins to quiver in anger. After all, they are ''scientists'' (because 'atheist' ''obviously'' means 'scientists' nowadays), who are you to [[flame_war|challenge]] [[USI|them]]?
Sometime within the past few years, a couple of [[lazy|misunderstood]] [[I_have_a_140_IQ|geniuses]] decided that Enlightenment philosophy had gone out of vogue 250 years too early. Instead of subscribing to the overwhelmingly-held view that people perceive the world differently, they concluded that there was absolute truth to everything. Conveniently, these absolute truths matched up with the viewpoints that these [[misogyny|brilliant]] [[eugenics|minds]] [[atheism|already]] [[Marxism|held]]. According to these individuals, the only way to see the world ~clearly~ is with the help of [[bullshit|empirical science]] and, of course, Logic and Reason- emotion be damned. Never mind the [[fact]] that human emotion and intuition are [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262603002859 necessary for effective decision-making]; so much as suggesting this to a Logic and Reason devotee will cause their chins to quiver in anger. After all, they are ''scientists'' (because 'atheist' ''obviously'' means 'scientists' nowadays)- who are you to [[flame_war|challenge]] [[USI|them]]?


== Enemies of LOGIC and REASON ==
== Enemies of LOGIC and REASON ==
Line 12: Line 12:
* [[Republicans]]
* [[Republicans]]
* Anyone without a degree in programming
* Anyone without a degree in programming
* [[OWS|The 1%]]
* AmeriKKKans who don't hate their country
* AmeriKKKans who don't hate their country
* Agnostics
* Agnostics
Line 23: Line 24:
* [[arabs|Non-whites]]
* [[arabs|Non-whites]]
* [[Reddit#r.2FAtheism|Anyone who doesn't eat babies]] [[I'm_so_random|lol xD]]
* [[Reddit#r.2FAtheism|Anyone who doesn't eat babies]] [[I'm_so_random|lol xD]]
== Logic and Reason in the Wild ==
If you encounter somebody ([[irony|non-ironically]]) worshiping Logic and Reason on the Internet or elsewhere, your best option is to run away else risk receiving a fatal overdose of [[smug]]. If you do decide to [[troll|point out the stupidity]] of following an outdated philosophy, be aware that you are fighting an uphill battle. These individuals lack the necessary self-awareness to realize that their viewpoints may be wrong and will always leave an argument feeling just as brilliant as ever.
== See Also ==
* [[Atheism]]
* [[Reddit]]
* [[Trying too hard]]
* [[Psuedo-intellectual]]

Revision as of 04:54, 20 July 2012

Logic and Reason is what happens when intellectually pubescent basement-dwellers attempt to handle philosophical topics that rest beyond their limits of cognitive power. In short, they are the twin gods worshiped by the hardcore atheists that inhabit the piss containers of the Internet. Due to its popularity among some of the lesser species of the Internet, invocation of Logic and Reason is diagnostic criteria for determining whether an Internet-goer is a full-blown, self-fellating pseudo-intellectual or just a standard douchebag.


Or, "I don't know the difference between humans and robots."

Sometime within the past few years, a couple of misunderstood geniuses decided that Enlightenment philosophy had gone out of vogue 250 years too early. Instead of subscribing to the overwhelmingly-held view that people perceive the world differently, they concluded that there was absolute truth to everything. Conveniently, these absolute truths matched up with the viewpoints that these brilliant minds already held. According to these individuals, the only way to see the world ~clearly~ is with the help of empirical science and, of course, Logic and Reason- emotion be damned. Never mind the fact that human emotion and intuition are necessary for effective decision-making; so much as suggesting this to a Logic and Reason devotee will cause their chins to quiver in anger. After all, they are scientists (because 'atheist' obviously means 'scientists' nowadays)- who are you to challenge them?

Enemies of LOGIC and REASON

Logic and Reason in the Wild

If you encounter somebody (non-ironically) worshiping Logic and Reason on the Internet or elsewhere, your best option is to run away else risk receiving a fatal overdose of smug. If you do decide to point out the stupidity of following an outdated philosophy, be aware that you are fighting an uphill battle. These individuals lack the necessary self-awareness to realize that their viewpoints may be wrong and will always leave an argument feeling just as brilliant as ever.

See Also