Talk:Amorrow

Autobio

Be assured that I am engaging in auto-biography, but I hope that it is sufficiently self-deprecating. That is the point, is it not? To perform online reputation hari-kari or self-immolation or something like that? Right?--Amorrow2 23:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Triple crown

Don't get so full of yourself, I've been banned from TOW/ED/WR too. Not all at the same time mind you. Ty 13:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Vanity

Isn't this page pretty much shitty vanity crap? Is that not like...what user boxes are for? Mike the Græt (Talk) 20:07, 14 February 2012 (EST)

• I think the article would exist even without the user. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 20:11, 14 February 2012 (EST)
• but the user's the one who wrote it and upkeeps it, and isn't really funny. Pretty vain, really. Mike the Græt (Talk) 20:18, 14 February 2012 (EST)
• Zaiger's was the same way for awhile. I don't get it, but I don't question the status quo. If someone who has been around longer sees fit to shitcan it, then so shall it be. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 20:20, 14 February 2012 (EST)
• But he's fucking Zaiger. I don't think the article's like crapshit and needs deleted, I just think it seems vain. Maybe it's because it's written by shoddy copy-cats. It makes it somebody who's not involved in wikipedia, but is involved in ED's radars go off. Then again I don't know the subject matter, that's why I just posted it on talk page and didn't shitspam templates. Mike the Græt (Talk) 20:25, 14 February 2012 (EST)

• Meh. You can ask Garrett if it warrants deletion. He'd give it a fair shake. TylerRosenow º Ӕ º ₡ º ✉ 20:28, 14 February 2012 (EST)
• I personally think just putting my opinions on the talk page is sufficient enough. If more people agree and this article's trafficked enough it'll be obvious what needs done. Until then I'm just going to file it under shit no one cares about. Mike the Græt (Talk) 20:30, 14 February 2012 (EST)