Talk:卐

REPRESENTIN' DA' D DEUTSCHELAND UBER ALLES Ghey Aemerican 00:11, 3 November 2011 (CET)

O hai

This page needs to be protected to prevent users from fagging it up.

--PresidentMudkip 02:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Done
--DocEvil 02:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
This page was much more lulz, when it described the Germany. This swastika is no lulz. --Deimos ^talk 15:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Can I put a 'See Also' in the end?Just so viewers can get to know that there is actual lulzy material on pages like Hitler and Nazi--ThePooThatTookaPee 14:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

• Yeah go ahead. The actual page that was there before (2009 was the last time it saw the light of day actually) was terrible, that is why it redirects here. Plus it trolls the fuck out of Deutchlanders lolol. --zaiger (talk) 14:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

there's no edit button .lopl--ThePooThatTookaPee 15:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Seltsam..... warum denken alle Amerikaner dass die Swastika, ein 6000 Jahre altes Symbol AUS INDIEN die Deutschen trollen soll??? Moment, ich bin ja Monarchist und kein Merkel-finanzierter Linker.....fuck. Allerdings stimmt es schon, dass lediglich eine Swastika als Artikel für ein Land mit so viel Pre-Hitler lulz und Geschichte etwas wenig ist, selbst bei den gültigen ED Standards. RandomPrussian1871

Um, because it does. I have gotten more butthurt directed at me over this article from Germans than I have from the rape article with women. Germans are so afraid that everyone sees them as Nazis and still blames them for the holocaust (I don't blame you by the way, you can't blame someone for something that didn't happen) that they made this Indian symbol with 6000 years of history illegal. You act like you don't care, but your culture clearly states otherwise. --zaiger (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2012 (EDT)

UMMM... Germans arent afraid of being called Nazis. I live in Germany, for example the first topic I remember which I learned in History lesson was about Nazi-Germany. Thats a stupid myth, we could write a long article instead of that shit. We can mention the time period 1933-45 in the article of course. The Swastika can stay in the article, but we can write more. --DatAss70 13:44, 20 August 2013 (EDT)

agree.-- Talk to me|Contribs 23:58, 21 January 2014 (EST)

Needs "PERFECT"

Can we add this to the top kplzthx

This article is perfect. Don't fuck with it!

Danieltepeskraus USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST 09:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Needs to be un-clickable first. - Another n00b 18:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Not everything needs to be unclickable. People do like to see image file pages. --zaiger (talk) 18:06, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Where's the Lulz?

Wasn't it this swastika? http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:Flashing_swastika.gif This new one is boring 3: DekoMan91 20:46, 13 November 2011 (CET)

As much as I'd like to have this page as it is...

If someone has an epileptic seizure on this page, ED is screwed. There needs to be some sort of epilepsy warning here to prevent people from having a reason to sue. ShylokVakarian 18:45, 20 November 2014 (EST)

Swastika

The swastika article should be in the see also. THE BOX (Talk to me pls) - (Shit I've done) 14:52, 23 May 2015 (EDT)