Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Gwen Gale: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Lyuba
to prior version
imported>Meepsheep
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cleanup}}
{{cleanup}}
{{wikify}}
{{wikify}}
[[File:Gwen Gale with heads of contributors she blocked.jpg|center|thumb|550px|[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gwen_Gale Gwen Gale] is [[masturbation|diddling her bug]] over cut off heads of contributors she blocked]]
[[File:Wyss2.jpg|thumb|right|<s>Gwen Gale</s>Heidi Wyss' big triumphant smile after her [[whore|cock sucking]] got her past [[Requests_for_adminship|RfA]]. Image courtesy of [[Daniel Brandt]].]]  
[[File:Wyss2.jpg|thumb|right|<s>Gwen Gale</s>Heidi Wyss' big triumphant smile after her [[whore|cock sucking]] got her past [[Requests_for_adminship|RfA]]. Image courtesy of [[Daniel Brandt]].]]  
'''Gwen Gale''' (aka [[whore|Heidi Wyss]]) is a Wikipedia user who has enraged the community with vicious [[Attack|personal attacks]], sock puppetry, edit warring, impersonation, breaching an Arbcom ban, and attempting to (promptly) put TOW führer [[Jimbo Wales]] in his place. After all of this, one would think this user would be permanently banned and driven out of Wikipedia land. Wrong. She currently holds an [[admin]] position, despite her history and [[hypocrite|clear disregard for site policy]].
'''Gwen Gale''' (aka [[whore|Heidi Wyss]]) is a Wikipedia user who has enraged the community with vicious [[Attack|personal attacks]], sock puppetry, edit warring, impersonation, breaching an Arbcom ban, and attempting to (promptly) put TOW führer [[Jimbo Wales]] in his place. After all of this, one would think this user would be permanently banned and driven out of Wikipedia land. Wrong. She currently holds an [[admin]] position, despite her history and [[hypocrite|clear disregard for site policy]].
Line 24: Line 25:
Pic from wikipedia-watch.org (Hivemind)
Pic from wikipedia-watch.org (Hivemind)


==Wikipedia History==
==Gwen Gale's Wikipedia story - the story of lies, nastiness, bulling,violating rulings of arbcom and abusing administrative tools==


Gwen Gale started her [[whore|career in Wikipedia]] as Wyss. She was completely obsessed about articles on [[sexuality]] and [[Sick fuck|lesbian science fiction]] because these topics give her [[orgasm|orgasms]].
Gwen Gale started her [[whore|career in Wikipedia]] as Wyss. She was completely obsessed about articles on [[sexuality]] and [[Sick fuck|lesbian science fiction]] because these topics give her [[orgasm|orgasms]].


'''To be continued by me and hopefully someone else.'''
Most of [[whore|Wyss]]'s [[Vomit|vomiting]] got [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewriting_History cleaned up later] but some still survived:


==Remaining raw materials to be used ==
*About [[Fred Bauder]], a member of ArbCom {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fred_Bauder&diff=prev&oldid=30774808 "Truth be told, according to freely available public records, he was suspended for soliciting a client's wife to work in a prostitution ring, then refusing to attend his hearing on it. Many would interpret this as "disbarred" but he denies the term applies. Bauder disclosed none of this to Mr Wales when he was asked to join lawyerish arbcomm. [[whore|Wyss]] 00:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)"]}}
*About Wikipedians, this one she deleted herself when unruly user [[whore|Wyss]] transformed to abusive administrator Gwen Gale {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FWilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone%2FWorkshop&action=historysubmit&diff=31671855&oldid=30963842 "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards."]}}


She was outed and blocked for this.
In November of 2005 Wyss's [[Dildo|sexual toys]] were taken away. Poor [[Whore|lady]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone#Ted_Wilkes_and_Wyss_banned_from_making_homosexuality.2Fbisexuality_edits was banned from making homosexuality/bisexuality edits]. She was even prohibited from correcting the spelling of "[[gay]]". How embarrassing! She [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone#Wyss_placed_on_Probation was also placed on indefinite probation], and then [[whore|Wyss]] made a new account [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depictions_of_lesbian_sex_in_pornography&diff=prev&oldid=31830636 The Witch] because she was interrupted in the middle of her monosex and because
<center>{{frame|{{morphquote|Anti-trolls speak|background-color: #FFC0CB; width: 600px; height: 200px|font-weight: bold;
There seems to be something missing in the way wording has developed here over the years to decribe what a ban is, as it relates to other policies, WP:3RR for one.
|[http://pages.citebite.com/r1j0t3k4j4nac Witchy girls have more fun]
|Wyss fucking Skepchick
}}|border=#FF879B|background=#FFC0CB}}</center>


Heidi Wyss has been blocked TEN times since joining Wikipedia.


She had SEVEN blocks under the username Wyss - See the Wyss Block Log - and THREE blocks under the name Gwen Gale - See Gwen's Block Log. She has been blocked for personal attacks, impersonation(?), multiple incidents of edit warring, breaching an Arbcom ban, and other offenses.
'''She had fun alright'''. The Witch's first edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depictions_of_lesbian_sex_in_pornography&diff=prev&oldid=31830636 was made] in violation of her ban for [[homosexuality]].  


Wyss appears to have violated the Arbcom ban issued in December 2005, where she was blocked from editing articles on sexuality. She was placed on indefinite probation, then created the sock The Witch, which edited an article on lesiban sex on Dec. 18th 2005. Heidi also violated the arbcom ruling in January, 2006, editing an article on lesbian science fiction. She added a link to herself, by the way, that time... She again violated the Arbcom ruling
More personal attacks followed:


by editing this article, removing a disputed tag from the section on sexuality. Here is another instance.


Wikipedia editors speak up about Heidi's abuse:
{{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/Fred_Bauder&diff=prev&oldid=35547895 "# '''Oppose''', an apparent liar who pursues a strictly unencyclopedic agenda. [[User:The Witch|The Witch]] 15:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)"]
Wyss has been in constant violation of the Arbitration Committee topical ban, through the use of an undeclared sockpuppet, and the behavior that led to her original case and ban, edit warring, incivility, and assumptions of bad faith, has continued for months now, as evidenced by this thread, as well as the previous blocks and discussions related to them. I propose that we take the current week-long block to consider that she be banned from editing indefinitely. Actually, she was placed on probation by the Arbitration Committee, which allowed for her to be banned with the agreement of three administrators ("If in the opinion of any three administrators, for good cause, she is responsible for disrupting the functioning of Wikipedia, restrictions may be placed on her editing, up to and including a general ban of one year.") I don't think it is unreasonable to consider the year that that expired after to be reset due to the sockpuppetry, and to go by those guidelines. Dmcdevit·t 21:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


I support Dmcdevit's summary. I'd be willing to be one of those 3. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 21:59, 21 May 2007
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/Snowspinner&diff=prev&oldid=35548817 "# '''Oppose''', Intellectually unqualified and the worst of roleplaying. [[User:The Witch|The Witch]] 15:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)"]}}
Gwen has blocked hundreds and hundreds of people in just October and November 2008. She throws around her admin power with reckless abandon, while at the same time breaking Wikipedia rules, with a smug sense of protection. Other editors rally to defend her, by banning users who question her and reverting any question of Gwen's actions.


All of Gwen's socks and IPs have many articles in common. Look them over and see articles such as Eva Braun, Hitler, other Nazi names, Amelia Earhart, lesbian stuff, Joshua Gadner, Nukumaroo, etc. Look for yourself. I made it easy. Here are the revision histories of some of Heidi Wyss' usernames and socks (not counting single use socks, listed later):
'''The above explains''' why [[bully|administrator Gwen Gale]] does not want anything to do with the nasty Witch. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AThe_Witch&action=historysubmit&diff=256329384&oldid=256326444 She reverted this valid redirect to her user page] and the user who made this redirect was blocked for vandalism.
Gwen Gale
Wyss
The Witch
81.50.166.26
194.146.111.10
81.50.166.26


Interesting, huh?
In her first RfA Gwen Gale  was asked about The Witch.
She lied {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Questions_from_BusterD For about 24 hours, two years ago, yes. I quickly decided User:The Witch was an unhelpful username so I went back to User:Wyss. You will please note the account wasn't used to evade the arbcom ruling. I don't consider this brief experiment relevant but I'll be happy to answer questions about it.]}} She lied. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depictions_of_lesbian_sex_in_pornography&diff=prev&oldid=31830636 She used it "to evade the arbcom ruling"]. 


Gwen admits to using the sock, The Witch. See the contributions of The Witch. Here it is stated by Wyss that she used the sock The Witch. You will see this sock and the user name Gwen Gale were involved with the Josh Gardner article. This article caused some trouble for Gwen. Here, Gwen again admits using the sock The Witch. She says personal information was being posted on Wikipedia by another and she was concerned about being outed.


She was not very concerned about her personal information when she wrote articles on herself and linked to them multiple times.
'''Testimonials taken from Gwen Gale's first RfA''' 
*By [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mike_Halterman administrator Mike Halterman] {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=186576494&oldid=186559085 the people before me have more than done their job compiling loads of pure bitter nastiness that has spewed from this user's mouth. The last thing we need out of new admins is more drama. Don't bother replying here or on my talk page, my mind is very firmly made up.]}}
*By [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Antandrus administrator Antandrus]{{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=186447866&oldid=186446268 I cannot support someone who replaces her userpage with "Tell the Wikitruth", followed by a rant about how we're an "autistic care group for the obese and unemployed", and then defends it in that state for months]}}


Gwen Gale made her identity as Heidi Wyss public, when she began two articles on herself. One was on the self-proclaimed "swiss author" Heidi Wyss and the other on a non-notable trashy ebook she wrote called Gormglaith. Now, these two articles would have normally been smashed by Gwen Gale, if they were written by anyone else. The "notable swiss author" Heidi Wyss seems to have never been published, never made a dime from her "career" as a "swiss author" and never been recognized by any legitimate source. Still Gwen Gale thought these articles were just fine for Wikipedia. After all, they were about her! Never mind conflict of interest. Never mind original reseach, or any other Wikipedia rule. She makes exceptions for herself. Heaven help you if you question her.
Gwen [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Candidate.27s_closing_statement_about_the_conduct_of_this_RFA bitterly moaned] about her unsuccessful RfA.


When she nominated herself for Arbcom in late 2008, these articles and her COI and NPOV came to light and both articles were put up for deletion and deleted.
'''Just five months later''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale_2 wikiidiots allowed Gwen Gale to become an administrator] - a black day for Wikipedia.


See these links to the articles of deletion pages here. See screenshots of the revision histories here and here, proving Gwen gale wrote them about herself. The revision history of these articles is now gone, since thees pages were deleted. Thus, the author of these articles would never be known, if not for screenshots of the histories. I captured screenshots to prove Gwen wrote these articles about herself. The articles were created on January 19, 2007 and Wyss redirected her name and changed it to Gwen Gale on 11/23/06. She couldn't create the articles under her Wyss username, that would be too obvious.
'''In April of 2008 Gwen Gale''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29 nominated for deletion] article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_J._Meyer Leo J. Meyer]. In AfD she ranted:
{{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29&oldid=203579523 Conflict of interest, subject of this biographical article is not of encyclopedic interest meyerj is an SPA who created this article to memorialize his father. The subject is not encyclopedic (a routine military career), not widely noted, the article amounts to original research and its creation raises many COI worries.]}}


Gwen Gale edited the Gormglaith articles as late as October 2008, continuing the COI and NPOV violations. Here she jokes about how her book is a big internet hit. How can you cry "privacy" concerns, Gwen, when you have plastered your name all over Wikipedia?
'''CONFLICT of INTEREST'''. Wait a minute. Didn't Gwen Gale wrote two articles about herself a year before? The articles were flushed out but the screen shots of their history exist: [http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/1431/89587859ig5.jpg History of the bio article of Heidi Wyss (Gwen Gale)] and [http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/6083/92979875oe7.jpg history of the article about a novel written by Heidi Wyss (Gwen Gale)]. She promotes her articles about herself everywhere she could
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ALesbian_utopia&action=historysubmit&diff=157664628&oldid=157660279 "* [[Gormglaith (novel)]] Depicts an all female society in which people mix their genes together through technology to have normal pregnancies. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] 18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)"]
*Adds link to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Separatist_feminism&action=historysubmit&diff=156808847&oldid=138770966 "Noteworthy separatist feminists: Heidi Wyss"] to an article.


Looking at those screenshots of the two article's revision histories, (listed again here and here) there are several IPs Heidi used to edit the articles. The IP histories are now gone, since the articles were deleted and the IPs made NO OTHER EDITS TO WIKIPEDIA, except to Heidi's articles. Are we to believe these random IPs, all from where Gwen lives, Switzerland, came to Wikipedia, knew the format and only made changes to the Heidi Wyss and Gormglaith articles and never returned? Please. These IPs are socks used by Gwen to further push her articles, her POV and to try to avoid detection.
'''When Gwen Gale was still Wyss''' she had this to say about wikipedia {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28news%29&diff=prev&oldid=77752352 If one wishes to participate in an alphabetized meta-blog/online social community with a Byzantine bureaucracy which encourages sock puppets, trolls and endless references to pop culture beliefs which have naught to do with scholarship, yeah, then "pfft," I think, would be the appropriate response to any criticism that Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia.[[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)]}}


These IPs are: (They are all located in the histories again linked here and here )
So [[whore|Wyss]] wanted to talk about "sock puppets". Let's talk about sock puppets then.  
Click on the history of these IPs listed below. They have none. They all just edited the Heidi Wyss articles...
'''Gwen Gale''' made quite a few appearances on Wikipedia:


62.203.186.133
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wyss User Wyss]
81.62.150.92
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&target=The+Witch User The Witch]
81.62.178.203
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lesbian_science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=36891982 Editing as IP#194.146.111.10, violates her topic ban and adds a link to her own lesbian novel to article ''Lesbian science fiction'']
81.62.148.165
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lesbian_science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=82445461 Editing as IP#194.146.111.10, violates her topic ban in article ''Lesbian science fiction'']
81.62.183.14
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feminist_science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=101807414 Editing as IP#85.1.29.61, violates her topic ban and adds a link to her own lesbian novel to article ''Feminist science fiction'' ]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Separatist_feminism&diff=prev&oldid=156808847 Editing as IP#85.0.43.89, violates her topic ban and adds a link to her own lesbian novel to article ''Separatist feminism'']
*'''She used various IPs''' to write two articles about herself [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi_Wyss Heidi Wyss] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gormglaith_%28novel%29 Gormglaith (novel)].


These IPs - 81.62.183.14 - 81.62.178.203 - 81.62.150.92 - resolve to the same location! Three random people, editing Heidi's articles??? These are very close. 81.62.148.165 - 62.203.186.133
===2008 ArbCom election===
'''In six months''' after Gwen gale became [[bully|an administrator]] she decided she wanted more power because the more power she has the more harm she could do. One of the best places to do harm is Wikipedia's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court Arbitration Committee].  


Again, look at the screen shots here and here, of the now deleted histories of the two articles Gwen wrote about herself. All these IPs were editing from th same location. Where Gwen lives.  
'''Testimonials taken from Gwen Gale's ArbCom bid''' 
*By [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mike_Halterman administrator Mike Halterman] {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008%2FVote%2FGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=255116395&oldid=255113719 Gwen Gale wasn't even on my radar, positively or negatively, until this week, and then I was involved in an incident with her and her judgment gave me such pause. So for that, I oppose, and suggest she looks into how she deals with disputes. Like it or not, this is the highest community "court" or what have you that we have here, and after what I saw, I don't want her on it, probably ever.]}}


Enter them here IP Tracer and see for yourself.
*By [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Shankbone administrator David Shankbone] {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008%2FVote%2FGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=255126563&oldid=255124705 I'm sorry, but you really sunk it for me on Talk:Rush Limbaugh. I found your arguments and sources on there to be a disgrace, frankly. Or, User:Avruch said, "I think some of your arguments have been disingenuous, and beneath what I believe your intelligence and perceptive ability to be."]}}


No, these IPs are not Heidi Wyss. They are random people, from within a few mils of each other, coming to Wikipedia, making minor changes and additions to articles on Heidi Wyss articles and never again returning.
*By [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:East718 administrator East718] {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:East718/ACE2008 aka Wyss. Formerly placed under editing restrictions by ArbCom for unseemly conduct; evaded these restrictions with a sockpuppet... Zero-tolerance attitude towards adminship makes them wholly incompatible with a role of higher responsibility that requires more creative solutions.]}}


You have been outed Heidi, I mean Gwen...
[[Bully|Gwen Gale]] withdrew her candidacy from the election.


Other IPs Heidi Wyss used to link to herself - These IPs , except 194, also made no other edits to Wikipedia
'''December 1, 2008''' was not a happy day for Gwen Gale. Not only she was forced to withdraw her candidacy from [[Arbitration Committee]] election, but both articles she and her socks wrote about herself [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heidi_Wyss&oldid=255278378 were nominated on deletion] for being [[Bullshit|not notable]].
85.0.43.89 - Heidi adds herself to a list of "noteworthy feminists."
194.146.111.10 - Heidi Adds herself to noteworthy Lesibian Science Fiction writers
85.1.29.61 - Heidi adds her e-book to Selected Works of Feminist Science Fiction.
81.49.216.232 - Heidi adds herself to a list of female science fiction writers


As mentioned eariler, after nominating herself for ArbCom in late 2008 (Yes, Gwen thinks she is ArbCom material!) she was outed for her many Wikipedia violations. In the AfD, her cronies reverted any comments about Gwen writing and editing articles about herself, trying to hide this blatant violation. See this diff.
===Cover up===
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wyss&oldid=89526010 User Wyss talk page history was deleted] by Fred Bauder. When during her RfA Gwen Gale was questioned about this deletion.As usually she lied: "The talk pages were sprinkled with bits of personal information I'd disclosed about myself in causal exchanges and a certain user had homed in on who I was, where I lived and so on." In reality with the deletion of her talk page history [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_User:Onefortyone most links used in evidences] presented against her in arbitration case are gone.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wyss&diff=29602256&oldid=29602121 Try one, you'll see nothing].


Gwen was notified on her talk page of the deletions of the two articles SHE started on herself. She refused to comment and quickly moved the thread OFF HER MAIN DISCUSSION PAGE, to her talk archives, within A FEW HOURS OF IT BEING POSTED! Any other time she would be on her high horse raising hell and defending herself. This time, knowing she is caught, she cowardly refuses to comment. Another respectful question on her talk page was quickly removed. Again, she refuses to comment.
===More lies, more personal attacks===


When it was brought up to ANI that Gwen was doing this, bozos such as "Lessheard Vanu" (look at this douche) refuse to address the questions at hand. See This. Then, user Jehochman removed questions about Gwen writing these articles and, like everyone else, refuses to address the behavior of Gwen Gale. These Wikipedia clones are pathetic. See this. A day later, user CharlotteWebb deleted the entire thread. Why are these people trying to hide the truth and watching Gwen block other editors for the same thing?
'''In July 2005''' Wyss addressed to administrator Mel Etitis with this rant {{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Natalie_Wood&diff=18135917&oldid=18134747 Dearest troll, I don't have a second account. If you're still making the accusation, then prove it. [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 4 July 2005 16:34 (UTC)]}}{{quote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Natalie_Wood&diff=18179516&oldid=18162730 "Dearest troll, you accuse me of being a sock. You have used that accusation to imply I was editing abusively and dishonestly, then leveraged it in your active, PoV editing of these articles. Withdraw the accusation or prove it (I suspect you know that any emperical examination of the two accounts would show they can't belong to the same individual). [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 5 July 2005 08:14 (UTC)]}}


Gwen was told of the problems arising from her conflict of interest here and quickly threw the discussion into her talk archives, after saying she won't bother to answer! Other editors chime in and say they have removed content.
'''Maybe in July of 2005 she did not have a sock account, but she was about to make one''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depictions_of_lesbian_sex_in_pornography&diff=prev&oldid=31830636 The Witch], not to mention editing as IPs.


Gwen has also refused to address this subject.
'''Gwen's reaction to 24 hours block''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive1#Too_many_trolls_and_fools_after_all.2C_I_guess "Too many trolls and fools after all, I guess.There are too many of them for me here, too many role-playing troll admins, too many troll sockpuppet editors. Bye then. Gwen Gale 06:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)"]


In this diff, removed by J Delanoy, a question was asked about how she trashed Jimbo Wales, trashed Wikipedia editors, and storms off to Wiki Truth to bash Wikipedia. It was a classic 3-year-old tantrum by Gwen Gale and she refused to comment on it. Gwen also removed valid questions about her actions from her own ArbCom questions page! She is supposed to answer questions, as a candidate and she is censoring the page, trying to save face!
===Gwen Gale - a bully administrator===
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive6#User:Super_Badnik User Super Badnik's story]. The block was reverted by another administrator.


Gwen Gale withdrew her nomination for Arbcom while this was going on. Wonder why?
<small>This section will be continued </small>


Gwen outed herself first liking to a webpage about her, in August of 2006, shortly before she changed her name from Wyss to Gwen Gale and wrote the articles on herself, which proved to be her demise. She used this IP, 194.146.111.10, just another sock. She used that IP, as a sock, from June 2005 to November 2006.
===Recent misuse of administrative tools===
After witchy Wyss became bitchy administrator Gwen Gale she's  started misusing her tools to cover up her shitty history. Here Gwen Gale deletes history of Wyss's talk page    [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wyss/a4#Wikipedia:Avoid_personal_remarks "User request to delete page in own userspace: user thought this had been done years ago"]. Interesting she refers to herself as to some unknown to her user: "User request to delete page". She lies that this page is in her "own userspace". She deleted '''the only page''' that had talk history of [[whore|Wyss]]. The date of this misuse of administrative tools is '''16 July, 2011'''.


When another user caught on to her self-centered agenda and outed her, she twisted this around to being "stalked" (another cry for attention) and twisted everything to smooth over the use of the sock Gwen Gale, changing her name to Gwen Gale. Somehow, it worked, for a while. Until now.
==Heidi Wyss struggles in [[Internet|a spider web]]==
'''If you missed on articles''' Wyss wrote about herself on Wikipedia, do not worry. She wrote a few more the same ones on different encyclopedias as well. Wyss's first user name on feministSF wiki was Spidermite. At her user page she says: {{quote|1=[http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=User:Spidermite "Hey there! I'm a word witch and a lesbian separatist, third wave feminist."]}}


More about Gwen stomping off and leaving Wikipedia for a time:
'''Besides making''' [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=FSFwiki_talk:Wikipedia&oldid=3505 some comments about Wikipedia] Wyss as usually wrote two articles about herself [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Heidi_Wyss ''Heidi Wyss'']and [http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Gormglaith Gormglaith].


Here is a post by user Wyss that she is leaving. This link to the internet archive documents the post, which was been deleted from Wikipedia. This was done with the dissolution of user Wyss, as it originally appeared on Wyss' user page, which now doesn't exist and redirects to Gwen Gale.
'''Everything was fine with the two articles''' until [[whore|Wyss]] became Wikipedia administrator [[Bully|Gwen Gale]]. In 2008 somebody started adding to the articles reviews and links that Wyss did not like. She made four sock accounts to revert IP user
Since I believe many of the world's problems arise not only from ignorance but from the gathered behaviour of otherwise sensible folks basing their myriad daily decisions on labyrinths of mis-information, I don't want to participate in the building of a product which is widely known to wontedly distribute factually-mistaken, unbalanced and poorly-written text to millions of people. Heartfelt thanks to those who have been in touch here and by email :) Wyss 10:27, 4 December 2005
*[http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Eulalia Eulalia]
Gwen blabs a lot more about how Wikipedia sucks, how it is nothing but trolls and idiots, etc. Everyone is a second-class moron, EXCEPT WYSS! Just ask her. Another notice about her stomping off (cry for attention) - Another here.
*[http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/BeatriceCenci BeatriceCenci]
*[http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Sparrow Sparrow]
*[http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/JoeKleon JoeKleon]


More how she slams Jimbo Wales, ArmCom members, etc here, here, and here (Attacking Jimbo on his talk page).
'''[http://wiki.feministsf.net/index.php?title=Gormglaith&action=historysubmit&diff=31625&oldid=31623 Her JoeKleon almost got banned]


Gwen's history as far as I could trace it stats with IP 81.50.166.26. Same articles Gwen is still involved in, such as Amelia Earhart. An article created by this IP, Nikumaroro, is still frequently edited by Gale.
 
'''To be continued by me and hopefully someone else.'''
Any 3RR violations? Here, here,
 
here, here, here, here, and here, just to name a few.
 
Incivility? Distruption? Here, here,here, here (3rd paragraph), here, here, here, here (also read the two threads below this linked one), and here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here, just to name a few.


Does someone with this kind of history deserve Wikipedia Administration status, including the power to ban users for breaking the same rules Gwen Gale breaks?


Speak up. All over Wikipedia. Get Arbcom to issue an indefinite ban on Heidi Wyss, Gwen Gale and all other personalities she may possess..


{{wikipedia}}
{{wikipedia}}

Revision as of 23:58, 9 September 2011

This article needs a serious clean up

Somebody should do something about it.

Gwen Gale is diddling her bug over cut off heads of contributors she blocked
Gwen GaleHeidi Wyss' big triumphant smile after her cock sucking got her past RfA. Image courtesy of Daniel Brandt.

Gwen Gale (aka Heidi Wyss) is a Wikipedia user who has enraged the community with vicious personal attacks, sock puppetry, edit warring, impersonation, breaching an Arbcom ban, and attempting to (promptly) put TOW führer Jimbo Wales in his place. After all of this, one would think this user would be permanently banned and driven out of Wikipedia land. Wrong. She currently holds an admin position, despite her history and clear disregard for site policy.

Wikipedia's Gwen Gale - Heidi Wyss - EXPOSED!

Real Name: Heidi Wyss

Wikipedia Persona: Gwen Gale, The Witch, Wyss

IP Addresses: 81.62.183.14 - 81.62.178.203 - 81.62.150.92 - 81.50.166.26 - 194.146.111.10 - 81.50.166.26 - 62.203.186.133 - 81.62.148.165

Sex: Female

Sexual Orientation: Lesbian

Occupation: Wikipedia editor for lesbian literature articles

Favourite Pet: Other women

Favourite Hobby: Editing lesbian articles in Wikipedia, trolling other Wikipedia editors, pretends to be a fairy

Pic from wikipedia-watch.org (Hivemind)

Gwen Gale's Wikipedia story - the story of lies, nastiness, bulling,violating rulings of arbcom and abusing administrative tools

Gwen Gale started her career in Wikipedia as Wyss. She was completely obsessed about articles on sexuality and lesbian science fiction because these topics give her orgasms.

Most of Wyss's vomiting got cleaned up later but some still survived:

   
 
"Truth be told, according to freely available public records, he was suspended for soliciting a client's wife to work in a prostitution ring, then refusing to attend his hearing on it. Many would interpret this as "disbarred" but he denies the term applies. Bauder disclosed none of this to Mr Wales when he was asked to join lawyerish arbcomm. Wyss 00:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)"
 

 
 

  • About Wikipedians, this one she deleted herself when unruly user Wyss transformed to abusive administrator Gwen Gale
   
 
"Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards."
 

 
 

In November of 2005 Wyss's sexual toys were taken away. Poor lady was banned from making homosexuality/bisexuality edits. She was even prohibited from correcting the spelling of "gay". How embarrassing! She was also placed on indefinite probation, and then Wyss made a new account The Witch because she was interrupted in the middle of her monosex and because

   
 
Witchy girls have more fun


 


 
 

—Wyss fucking Skepchick


She had fun alright. The Witch's first edit was made in violation of her ban for homosexuality.

More personal attacks followed:


   
 
"# Oppose, an apparent liar who pursues a strictly unencyclopedic agenda. The Witch 15:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)"

"# Oppose, Intellectually unqualified and the worst of roleplaying. The Witch 15:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)"
 


 
 

The above explains why administrator Gwen Gale does not want anything to do with the nasty Witch. She reverted this valid redirect to her user page and the user who made this redirect was blocked for vandalism.

In her first RfA Gwen Gale was asked about The Witch. She lied

   
 
For about 24 hours, two years ago, yes. I quickly decided User:The Witch was an unhelpful username so I went back to User:Wyss. You will please note the account wasn't used to evade the arbcom ruling. I don't consider this brief experiment relevant but I'll be happy to answer questions about it.
 

 
 

She lied. She used it "to evade the arbcom ruling".


Testimonials taken from Gwen Gale's first RfA

   
 
the people before me have more than done their job compiling loads of pure bitter nastiness that has spewed from this user's mouth. The last thing we need out of new admins is more drama. Don't bother replying here or on my talk page, my mind is very firmly made up.
 

 
 

   
 
I cannot support someone who replaces her userpage with "Tell the Wikitruth", followed by a rant about how we're an "autistic care group for the obese and unemployed", and then defends it in that state for months
 

 
 

Gwen bitterly moaned about her unsuccessful RfA.

Just five months later wikiidiots allowed Gwen Gale to become an administrator - a black day for Wikipedia.

In April of 2008 Gwen Gale nominated for deletion article Leo J. Meyer. In AfD she ranted:

   
 
Conflict of interest, subject of this biographical article is not of encyclopedic interest meyerj is an SPA who created this article to memorialize his father. The subject is not encyclopedic (a routine military career), not widely noted, the article amounts to original research and its creation raises many COI worries.
 

 
 

CONFLICT of INTEREST. Wait a minute. Didn't Gwen Gale wrote two articles about herself a year before? The articles were flushed out but the screen shots of their history exist: History of the bio article of Heidi Wyss (Gwen Gale) and history of the article about a novel written by Heidi Wyss (Gwen Gale). She promotes her articles about herself everywhere she could

When Gwen Gale was still Wyss she had this to say about wikipedia

   
 
If one wishes to participate in an alphabetized meta-blog/online social community with a Byzantine bureaucracy which encourages sock puppets, trolls and endless references to pop culture beliefs which have naught to do with scholarship, yeah, then "pfft," I think, would be the appropriate response to any criticism that Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia.Wyss 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 

 
 

So Wyss wanted to talk about "sock puppets". Let's talk about sock puppets then. Gwen Gale made quite a few appearances on Wikipedia:

2008 ArbCom election

In six months after Gwen gale became an administrator she decided she wanted more power because the more power she has the more harm she could do. One of the best places to do harm is Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee.

Testimonials taken from Gwen Gale's ArbCom bid

   
 
Gwen Gale wasn't even on my radar, positively or negatively, until this week, and then I was involved in an incident with her and her judgment gave me such pause. So for that, I oppose, and suggest she looks into how she deals with disputes. Like it or not, this is the highest community "court" or what have you that we have here, and after what I saw, I don't want her on it, probably ever.
 

 
 

   
 
I'm sorry, but you really sunk it for me on Talk:Rush Limbaugh. I found your arguments and sources on there to be a disgrace, frankly. Or, User:Avruch said, "I think some of your arguments have been disingenuous, and beneath what I believe your intelligence and perceptive ability to be."
 

 
 

   
 
aka Wyss. Formerly placed under editing restrictions by ArbCom for unseemly conduct; evaded these restrictions with a sockpuppet... Zero-tolerance attitude towards adminship makes them wholly incompatible with a role of higher responsibility that requires more creative solutions.
 

 
 

Gwen Gale withdrew her candidacy from the election.

December 1, 2008 was not a happy day for Gwen Gale. Not only she was forced to withdraw her candidacy from Arbitration Committee election, but both articles she and her socks wrote about herself were nominated on deletion for being not notable.

Cover up

User Wyss talk page history was deleted by Fred Bauder. When during her RfA Gwen Gale was questioned about this deletion.As usually she lied: "The talk pages were sprinkled with bits of personal information I'd disclosed about myself in causal exchanges and a certain user had homed in on who I was, where I lived and so on." In reality with the deletion of her talk page history most links used in evidences presented against her in arbitration case are gone. Try one, you'll see nothing.

More lies, more personal attacks

In July 2005 Wyss addressed to administrator Mel Etitis with this rant

   
 
Dearest troll, I don't have a second account. If you're still making the accusation, then prove it. Wyss 4 July 2005 16:34 (UTC)
 

 
 

   
 
"Dearest troll, you accuse me of being a sock. You have used that accusation to imply I was editing abusively and dishonestly, then leveraged it in your active, PoV editing of these articles. Withdraw the accusation or prove it (I suspect you know that any emperical examination of the two accounts would show they can't belong to the same individual). Wyss 5 July 2005 08:14 (UTC)
 

 
 

Maybe in July of 2005 she did not have a sock account, but she was about to make one The Witch, not to mention editing as IPs.

Gwen's reaction to 24 hours block "Too many trolls and fools after all, I guess.There are too many of them for me here, too many role-playing troll admins, too many troll sockpuppet editors. Bye then. Gwen Gale 06:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)"

Gwen Gale - a bully administrator

This section will be continued

Recent misuse of administrative tools

After witchy Wyss became bitchy administrator Gwen Gale she's started misusing her tools to cover up her shitty history. Here Gwen Gale deletes history of Wyss's talk page "User request to delete page in own userspace: user thought this had been done years ago". Interesting she refers to herself as to some unknown to her user: "User request to delete page". She lies that this page is in her "own userspace". She deleted the only page that had talk history of Wyss. The date of this misuse of administrative tools is 16 July, 2011.

Heidi Wyss struggles in a spider web

If you missed on articles Wyss wrote about herself on Wikipedia, do not worry. She wrote a few more the same ones on different encyclopedias as well. Wyss's first user name on feministSF wiki was Spidermite. At her user page she says:

   
 
"Hey there! I'm a word witch and a lesbian separatist, third wave feminist."
 

 
 

Besides making some comments about Wikipedia Wyss as usually wrote two articles about herself Heidi Wyssand Gormglaith.

Everything was fine with the two articles until Wyss became Wikipedia administrator Gwen Gale. In 2008 somebody started adding to the articles reviews and links that Wyss did not like. She made four sock accounts to revert IP user

Her JoeKleon almost got banned


To be continued by me and hopefully someone else.


Gwen Gale is part of a series on

Wikipedia

Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.