- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
He11sing920: Difference between revisions
imported>IcyNickers No edit summary |
imported>AnonymousKing |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Gimmick du jour == | == Gimmick du jour == | ||
Hellsing920's current series is Reaction & Review where all he does is sit on his ass in front of a blank screen | Hellsing920's current series is Reaction & Review where all he does is sit on his ass in front of a blank screen; shouts "Wow. Holy shit" to a movie that we never get to see; and then proceeds to bore the living shit out of viewers by stuttering, rambling and talking on and on for 15-20 minutes about a movie that could be expressed in 3 sentences. Yet he claims that this is more talented than whatever [[Jfreedan]] does. Of course, Hellsing will defend this style by stating that the lack of footage helps [[lol wut|prevent possible copyright infringement]] and that it makes his reviews [[bullshit|more authentic]], which doesn't make a crock of sense because many popular and far more talented movie reviewers from Red Letter Media, TGWTG and GameTrailers have used movie footage in their reviews MULTIPLE times and they rarely had their videos pull down. So Emer, your theory that a lack of footage helps prevent copyright infringement and add substance to your review is worthless, because how are you supposed to produce substantial reviews without footage to back up your argument, you stupid motherfucker? | ||
Hellsing's [[questionable logic|argument]] that he doesn't need footage to make his reviews authentic is further rendered invalid thus: | Hellsing's [[questionable logic|argument]] that he doesn't need footage to make his reviews authentic is further rendered invalid thus: | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* [[Fair use|You can still use film footage as long as you don't summarize the picture or go into detail on the plot]]. | * [[Fair use|You can still use film footage as long as you don't summarize the picture or go into detail on the plot]]. | ||
Hellsing fails to realize that without any footage to back up his arguments, he comes across talking like he's reading from cue cards in front of him, which leads some to question the legitimacy of his reviews, since it's highly doubtful that he recorded the whole entire experience of him watching a movie and then giving a review, as opposed to doing a number of takes for each reaction and review, which is more likely. | As stated earlier, Hellsing fails to realize that without any footage to back up his arguments, he comes across talking like he's reading from cue cards in front of him, which leads some to question the legitimacy of his reviews, since it's highly doubtful that he recorded the whole entire experience of him watching a movie and then giving a review, as opposed to doing a number of takes for each reaction and review, which is more likely. | ||
== Nerd fights == | == Nerd fights == |
Revision as of 17:57, 19 February 2013
The twin brother of Sean Fausz who possesses an ego the size of Texas and weighs more than PissedOffVideoGamer, Hellsing920 (Powerword: Emerson Prevost) started his Internet career writing unintelligent and painfully unfunny wrestling articles for ObsessedWithWrestling.com (now called OnlineWorldofWrestling.com) before deciding to make a name for himself on Youtube. Hellsing was around for not even all of 2007 until he got banned for copyright infringement for comparing himself to Peter Griffin. He then sought refuge at LiveVideo, where he considered it productive for a new game review to be released every six months. This shouldn't be a surprise since being lazy has always been Hellsing's cup of tea (read below).
Returning to evil ol' YouTube not even half a year later as He11sing920 ("11" instead of "LL") Hellsing tried to widen his audience by creating original rants and informative videos, bitching about shit no one cares about, including fans, anime, cellphones, golf, ICP, Chris-chan, Spax3, Sailormoonred1, TGWTG and The Dark Knight. Since then, Hellsing has regretted making these videos, yet he'll criticize guys like the Archfiend and BBC for making video after video attacking trivial stuff, despite the fact that he did the same thing in regards to the fanboys. Emer now spends his remaining days e-begging for people to buy him DVDs to view so he can uploads videos of himself watching the film and acting angry over how bad it is, since he's too lazy and cheap to download a movie from a site or buy a movie himself, despite now obtaining a full-time job at an indian casiono. Tragically, people actually do this. Much like Asalieri, Hellsing920 doesn't give a flying fuck about his fans, so why people donate movies to him (that he's likely not going to review anyway) is a mystery.
Gimmick du jour
Hellsing920's current series is Reaction & Review where all he does is sit on his ass in front of a blank screen; shouts "Wow. Holy shit" to a movie that we never get to see; and then proceeds to bore the living shit out of viewers by stuttering, rambling and talking on and on for 15-20 minutes about a movie that could be expressed in 3 sentences. Yet he claims that this is more talented than whatever Jfreedan does. Of course, Hellsing will defend this style by stating that the lack of footage helps prevent possible copyright infringement and that it makes his reviews more authentic, which doesn't make a crock of sense because many popular and far more talented movie reviewers from Red Letter Media, TGWTG and GameTrailers have used movie footage in their reviews MULTIPLE times and they rarely had their videos pull down. So Emer, your theory that a lack of footage helps prevent copyright infringement and add substance to your review is worthless, because how are you supposed to produce substantial reviews without footage to back up your argument, you stupid motherfucker?
Hellsing's argument that he doesn't need footage to make his reviews authentic is further rendered invalid thus:
- 75% of the movies he's reviewing are shitty exploitation movies, B-list films and other obscure pieces of crap that are hardly available in public domain, let alone seen by the mass public, and thus many companies and distributors don't care if the footage is used.
- Movies that ARE available are no longer relevant in the copyright world (since some are between 5-45 years old) and are now all over the Internet.
As stated earlier, Hellsing fails to realize that without any footage to back up his arguments, he comes across talking like he's reading from cue cards in front of him, which leads some to question the legitimacy of his reviews, since it's highly doubtful that he recorded the whole entire experience of him watching a movie and then giving a review, as opposed to doing a number of takes for each reaction and review, which is more likely.
Nerd fights
Speaking of lack of legitimacy, in a more recent instance, he called out BlackBusterCritic to his livestream channel for a debate and not even give him the rights to directly talk to him, only to communicate via text chat. BBC made a video in response to such, which was flagged down for hate speech after he said Hellsing920 looked like a worn out old armchair, and BBC made a short response to the flagged video too. Naturally, Hellsing defended his actions, claiming that his livestream channel wouldn't allow him to let BBC talk, even if he wanted to. Of course, that doesn't explain how he could get his friends RandomDCE, Asalieri and UrinatingTree onto his stream. But let's just say for arguments' sake that Emer COULDN'T get BBC to talk on his stream; if that's the case, then maybe he shouldn’t have challenged the dude to come to his stream in the first place, cause when you challenge someone to a debate, knowing that you have the privilege to talk on the mic but the other person does not, then you've pretty much lost.
There is much debate as to how, exactly, Hellsing920 actually has a YouTube career, since merely looking at this morbidly obese blob of a man's grotesque bulk should make it obviously apparent to anybody that he will have nothing of insight or interest to add to any debate. Nobody should care what somebody who looks like Hellsing920 thinks about anything, let alone some shitty old video game or crappy horror movie that only four other people have seen. It is unknown how he even has the slightest motivation to do anything for the matter, as in every video he doesn't seem remotely interested in the reviews he's currently doing, maybe it's just too much effort for a fat fuck like him to do a show that is so effortless to create, that even a monkey with AIDS can outperform him.
The guy even has his own 99& Tropes page, which shows that even retards exist beyond Youtube.
Previous Quote | Next Quote
See Also
- Obesity
- Man The Harpoons
- Flaggot
- Talentless
- Video Game Reviewers
- Asalieri - A great friend of his.
External Links
|