Category talk:People

2963

That's how many articles I'm currently seeing in this category. What do you guys think about possibly breaking it up into subsections on the basis of shared traits? Would be a lot of work. Obvious thing off the bat is females/males. Then there are already existing things like furries. A lot of articles are ONLY in people. That's fine if we're only using it for tabulating purposes and not organizational, but as it is, it's really too massive for casual browsing anymore. Maybe a Category:Types of People could be a subsection that appears on the first page, and other forms of organization could appear under it? ^Ty_c 03:24, 1 May 2012 (EDT)