Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Talk:Broadside: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mantequilla
→‎404 on the doc: new section
 
imported>Mantequilla
→‎404 on the doc: new section
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:27, 10 August 2012

This is the gayest shit yet to feature on ED/æ. And that is saying something. --Daviddwd 23:11, 4 August 2012 (EDT)

ur a fag 23:12, 4 August 2012 (EDT)
Eh, I kind of agree about it being gayer than AIDS, Christmas, Episcopalians, and even 8 guys fucking 9 guys. Anytime you're using the word "corruption" as a serious charge against someone in an ED article, and with such seriousness, it seems like swimming in dangerous water. I suppose it's redeemed by the writer and the regime not giving a fuck, for one, and two, trying to evolve the wiki in such a way that it keeps up with the...hmm, how to put this... mutating state of the Internet. So far as it goes, despite the fact that I hate politics, I do mostly love the policies the party wants to put into action. A bit leftard at times, but fine with me, since most of the shit I disliked doesn't directly effect me anyway. If anything though, the ED-Party sort of seems to deserve it's own article, rather than a piggy back on another article. It's crappy-hipster-funny, really. Which is fine if you're a total faggot. I myself dabble in faggotry from time to time. This entire comment, for instance. --Barrabas 23:12, 5 August 2012 (EDT)
I thought ED had its hands full with Copypasta, Nerd Rage and Bronies. If only there was some kind of Wiki dedicated to leaked documents...Xxxyyyzzz 00:45, 7 August 2012 (EDT)

Well, I have no problems with political uprising in my ED, but I hope this doesn't bring other more boring shit with it. And this article wasn't very fun either. Anyways, with some actual involvement from people this could actually become a massive case of IRL lulz, not matching Chanology but maybe coming close.InsaneBronyGuy 22:37, 8 August 2012 (EDT)

There is only one logical explanation for this

HI R3X! --KrouseMD 10:31, 6 August 2012 (EDT)

After 4 years

... of lurking ED I can honestly say this is the fucking GAYEST article I have ever read and the only tiem I have ever felt the need to make an account. Don't get me wrong this is decent content but this political bullcrap riding in it's wake is trying waaaaaay too hard to be taken seriously and just seems to have no place here whatsoever. Sort it out guise!!! For the sake of lulz and justice everywhere! --PeterMoses 18:05, 8 August 2012 (EDT)

It is an article written by a user, as are all of the articles. --zaiger (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

404 on the doc

file not found. We can host it on the actual wiki if someone can get me a copy of it.--zaiger (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2012 (EDT)