Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Talk:Fat Larry's Band: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Satanist
imported>4ourty
This page is still seriously like this? (-_-) can someone bother cleaning jeez.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Ugh. The in-joke of redirecting every band page to here should've died with the old ED...-[[User:Nanostrike|Nano]] 18:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Ugh. The in-joke of redirecting every band page to here should've died with the old ED...-[[User:Nanostrike|Nano]] 18:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
: Why? So we could have a bunch of repetitive shit articles that have no internet connection? The article on [[Elvis Presley]] is a spectacular example of this kind of fail. The Fat Larry's Band article surpasses almost all other non-internet music articles in that it pisses off all the assholes who just want to make bad puns, post crappy shoops, and take up bandwidth on ED. In fact, The Fat Larry's Band article is rather an ED user shibboleth, showing us that those who laugh are destined to be good contributors, and those who bitch are destined to fail.  
:Why? So we could have a bunch of repetitive shit articles that have no internet connection? The article on [[Elvis Presley]] is a spectacular example of this kind of fail. The Fat Larry's Band article surpasses almost all other non-internet music articles in that it pisses off all the assholes who just want to make bad puns, post crappy shoops, and take up bandwidth on ED. In fact, The Fat Larry's Band article is rather an ED user shibboleth, showing us that those who laugh are destined to be good contributors, and those who bitch are destined to fail. [[User:Depravo|Depravo]] 03:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Depravo|Depravo]] 03:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


:Couldn't agree more --[[User:ThePooThatTookaPee|ThePooThatTookaPee]] 21:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


Couldn't agree more --[[User:ThePooThatTookaPee|ThePooThatTookaPee]] 21:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
::Some of the bands that redirect here could use their own articles like DragonForce "hardest metal known to man". [[User:Ninja|Ninja]] 16:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
::Some of the bands that redirect here could use their own articles like DragonForce "hardest metal known to man". [[User:Ninja|Ninja]] 16:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


Line 18: Line 17:
== [[Unfunny]] and [[Uncyclopedia]]-friendly article ==
== [[Unfunny]] and [[Uncyclopedia]]-friendly article ==


I'm serious. HOW THE FUCK DID THIS ARTICLE GET CONSIDERED FUCKIN FUNNY AND GOOD??????!?!?!????????????????????? It's short as fuck, it barely has anything on it but the stuff on it is so [[unfunny]] that I mean Jesus Christ I couldn't crack even a smile reading it or anything. I mean shit [[fact|it's just as funny as Uncyclopedia]]. Even [[Muse|this article]] [[fact|is even funnier]]. First, it isn't anything like ED. It doesn't have any drama or ANY [[lulz]], it looks literally like some fanboy wrote it on [[Uncyclopedia]], it's not funny. Seriously, wtf is this shit? Someone should at least improve, expand and add MOAR lulz to the article. It's boring and short as fuck. Admit it, this article is bad. I don't give a fuck if it was featured. Still, it's a shitty [[Uncyclopedia]]-friendly article.
I'm serious. HOW THE FUCK DID THIS ARTICLE GET CONSIDERED FUCKIN FUNNY AND GOOD??????!?!?!????????????????????? It's short as fuck, it barely has anything on it but the stuff on it is so [[unfunny]] that I mean Jesus Christ I couldn't crack even a smile reading it or anything. I mean shit [[fact|it's just as funny as Uncyclopedia]]. Even [[Muse|this article]] [[fact|is even funnier]]. First, it isn't anything like ED. It doesn't have any drama or ANY [[lulz]], it looks literally like some fanboy wrote it on [[Uncyclopedia]], it's not funny. Seriously, wtf is this shit? Someone should at least improve, expand and add MOAR lulz to the article. It's boring and short as fuck. Admit it, this article is bad. I don't give a fuck if it was featured. Still, it's a shitty [[Uncyclopedia]]-friendly article. [[User:Satanist|RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER]] 14:13, 12 June 2013 (EDT)


[[User:Satanist|RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER]] 14:13, 12 June 2013 (EDT)
:From what I understand, it's a redirect dumping ground for all the shitty music articles idiots like to make that aren't lulzy at all and just tend to be even more fucking stupid [[shitty attack article]] pieces. Personally, I like this in joke, if only because I've seen some of those shitty articles, and I'd rather see this article than those monuments to even more unfunny fail. Besides, I actually got a bit of a chuckle out of this article, believe it or not, if only because compared to shit it redirects from, it's lulzy as hell '''''[[User:DarkLordTR|DarkLordTR]]'''''  -->  [[File:Pwning trollcat.jpg|50px|link=User talk:DarkLordTR|Talk here, n00bs.]] 14:30, 12 June 2013 (EDT)DarkLordTR
:From what I understand, it's a redirect dumping ground for all the shitty music articles idiots like to make that aren't lulzy at all and just tend to be even more fucking stupid [[shitty attack article]] pieces. Personally, I like this in joke, if only because I've seen some of those shitty articles, and I'd rather see this article than those monuments to even more unfunny fail. Besides, I actually got a bit of a chuckle out of this article, believe it or not, if only because compared to shit it redirects from, it's lulzy as hell '''''[[User:DarkLordTR|DarkLordTR]]'''''  -->  [[File:Pwning trollcat.jpg|50px|link=User talk:DarkLordTR|Talk here, n00bs.]] 14:30, 12 June 2013 (EDT)DarkLordTR
::{{quote|it's a redirect dumping ground for all the shitty music articles idiots like to make that aren't lulzy at all| this guy knows...}}
::{{quote|it's a redirect dumping ground for all the shitty music articles idiots like to make that aren't lulzy at all| this guy knows...}}
<center><big>&bull;</big> [[User_talk:Mr_Jonzz|''Mr.''<font color=006400>'''''Jonzz'''''</font>]] [[File:JNZ.png|25px|link=User:Mr_Jonzz]] 16:35, 12 June 2013 (EDT)</center>
<center><big>&bull;</big> [[User_talk:Mr_Jonzz|''Mr.''<font color=006400>'''''Jonzz'''''</font>]] [[File:JNZ.png|25px|link=User:Mr_Jonzz]] 16:35, 12 June 2013 (EDT)</center>


Well still the article is [[crap]]. You can help by completely rewriting it and/or adding real lulz/drama.
::Well still the article is [[crap]]. You can help by completely rewriting it and/or adding real lulz/drama. Also, Zaiger says if an article is shit. Imprvoe not remove. So you should have all just imprvoed those articles than redirecting to some uncyclopedipa-friendly article. sorry about the spppppppelling errors. My keys are fucked up [[User:Satanist|RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER]] 18:21, 12 June 2013 (EDT)
Also, Zaiger says if an article is shit. Imprvoe not remove. So you should have all just imprvoed those articles than redirecting to some uncyclopedipa-friendly article. sorry about the spppppppelling errors. My keys are fucked up
 
[[User:Satanist|RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER]] 18:21, 12 June 2013 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:09, 14 August 2023

Ugh. The in-joke of redirecting every band page to here should've died with the old ED...-Nano 18:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Why? So we could have a bunch of repetitive shit articles that have no internet connection? The article on Elvis Presley is a spectacular example of this kind of fail. The Fat Larry's Band article surpasses almost all other non-internet music articles in that it pisses off all the assholes who just want to make bad puns, post crappy shoops, and take up bandwidth on ED. In fact, The Fat Larry's Band article is rather an ED user shibboleth, showing us that those who laugh are destined to be good contributors, and those who bitch are destined to fail. Depravo 03:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Couldn't agree more --ThePooThatTookaPee 21:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Some of the bands that redirect here could use their own articles like DragonForce "hardest metal known to man". Ninja 16:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Nobody cares if your shitty dialup cannot handle ED. What does matter is whether or not an article's content is funny, dramatic, or otherwise amusing. If it sucks it won't matter how long it is; it's getting flushed. That being said, there is not much to say about DragonForce, AC/DC, Led Zeppelin, The Beatles, U2, Coldplay, or any other famous bands, metal or otherwise, that redirect here. Revered as they may be, they're just not capable of stirring up as much drama as totally ignoring them does. At least Elvis has been appealing to conspiracy retards for years. Then there's Metallica with the whole Napster ordeal and Michael Jackson's legacy has been so much of a freakshow that it was impossible to ignore, both before and after he died. The same can sort of be said about Madonna. Aside from maybe Metallica, none of these really connected to the web but they had enough of a IRL impact to make their fans on the internet go crazy. So unless DragonForce, or their fans, do something or get into something that creates internet drama, they'll remain off the radar. No name 17:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Couldn't agree more! -- Depravo 04:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
y u mad tho Ninja 06:36, 22 July 2011 (CEST)
I'm replying to everyone at once. The first couple sentences do not necessarily concern you but the rest does. No name 10:04, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

Either improve the article or the redirects of other bands get deleted.

RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER 14:14, 12 June 2013 (EDT)

Unfunny and Uncyclopedia-friendly article

I'm serious. HOW THE FUCK DID THIS ARTICLE GET CONSIDERED FUCKIN FUNNY AND GOOD??????!?!?!????????????????????? It's short as fuck, it barely has anything on it but the stuff on it is so unfunny that I mean Jesus Christ I couldn't crack even a smile reading it or anything. I mean shit it's just as funny as Uncyclopedia. Even this article is even funnier. First, it isn't anything like ED. It doesn't have any drama or ANY lulz, it looks literally like some fanboy wrote it on Uncyclopedia, it's not funny. Seriously, wtf is this shit? Someone should at least improve, expand and add MOAR lulz to the article. It's boring and short as fuck. Admit it, this article is bad. I don't give a fuck if it was featured. Still, it's a shitty Uncyclopedia-friendly article. RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER 14:13, 12 June 2013 (EDT)

From what I understand, it's a redirect dumping ground for all the shitty music articles idiots like to make that aren't lulzy at all and just tend to be even more fucking stupid shitty attack article pieces. Personally, I like this in joke, if only because I've seen some of those shitty articles, and I'd rather see this article than those monuments to even more unfunny fail. Besides, I actually got a bit of a chuckle out of this article, believe it or not, if only because compared to shit it redirects from, it's lulzy as hell DarkLordTR --> Talk here, n00bs. 14:30, 12 June 2013 (EDT)DarkLordTR
   
 
it's a redirect dumping ground for all the shitty music articles idiots like to make that aren't lulzy at all
 

 
 

— this guy knows...

Mr.Jonzz 16:35, 12 June 2013 (EDT)
Well still the article is crap. You can help by completely rewriting it and/or adding real lulz/drama. Also, Zaiger says if an article is shit. Imprvoe not remove. So you should have all just imprvoed those articles than redirecting to some uncyclopedipa-friendly article. sorry about the spppppppelling errors. My keys are fucked up RED LORD THE SATAN LUCIFER 18:21, 12 June 2013 (EDT)