Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Neutral point of view: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
imported>Dildo Baggins
changing .com to .ch
imported>JuniusThaddeus
Domain change.
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{needsmoar|pix and lulz}}


'''Neutral Point of View''' means being unbiased in everything you say. For instance, this article is being completely unbiased right now, unlike all those goddamn [[liberal]] motherfuckers who all are smelly [[hippy|hippies]] and [[dead babies|baby killers]]. They are never unbiased.
'''Neutral Point of View''' (or '''NPOV''' for the [[retard]]s) is [[Wikipedia]]n for "Don't be a [[newfag]] and slag this article off, or we'll revert your edits".  


[[Fox News]] definitely uses a NPOV. I mean, they constantly remind us that they’re “[[Lie|fair and balanced]]”, so they must be telling the [[Bullshit|truth]]. Fox News would [[nevar]] lie.
The term is used frequently on Wikipedia and is an unwritten law of the Wikipedians, in which you must be unbiased in everything you say when making edits. This law states that [[Derp|your point of view should be neutral on the topic]] and should never say anything hateful or could otherwise slander the subject in any way. While this leaves little room for [[troll]]ing, sneaky Wikipedians can bypass this law by adding a "Controversy" title on the article and softly slagging it off with formal, unbiased sentences and using incredibly long words, while including evidence of said controversy. If you can do this and not ''ever'' have your edit reverted, you are a true troll.


Many use the ''' '[[Some argue]]...' ''' phrase before their statement to conveniently bypass NPOV.
==Other uses of NPOV==
 
[[Fox News]] definitely uses a NPOV. They constantly remind us that they’re “[[Lie|fair and balanced]]”, so they must be telling the [[Bullshit|truth]]. Fox News would [[nevar]] lie, not at all.
tl;dr: NPOV = the polar opposite of [[wikipedia]]


== [[Shit nobody cares about|A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman]] ==
== [[Shit nobody cares about|A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman]] ==
<s><div style="text-transform:uppercase">Neutral point of view sucks ok.<br>
<div style="text-transform:uppercase">Neutral point of view sucks ok.<br>
Nobody ever comes to the [[internet]] with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to [[cum|spout]] off okay? So this [[bullshit]] about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more [[stupid]] is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so</div>
Nobody ever comes to the [[internet]] with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to [[cum|spout]] off okay? So this [[bullshit]] about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more [[stupid]] is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so</div>


<BIG><BIG><BIG>[[STFU]]</BIG></BIG></BIG>[http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&diff=11814&oldid=11761]</s><BIG><BIG><BIG>HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS</BIG></BIG></BIG>
<big>'''[http://encyclopediadramatica.rs/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&diff=11814&oldid=11761 STFU]'''</big>


== See Also ==
== See Also ==

Latest revision as of 14:03, 23 March 2017

What? This article needs moar pix and lulz.
You can help by adding moar pix and lulz.

Neutral Point of View (or NPOV for the retards) is Wikipedian for "Don't be a newfag and slag this article off, or we'll revert your edits".

The term is used frequently on Wikipedia and is an unwritten law of the Wikipedians, in which you must be unbiased in everything you say when making edits. This law states that your point of view should be neutral on the topic and should never say anything hateful or could otherwise slander the subject in any way. While this leaves little room for trolling, sneaky Wikipedians can bypass this law by adding a "Controversy" title on the article and softly slagging it off with formal, unbiased sentences and using incredibly long words, while including evidence of said controversy. If you can do this and not ever have your edit reverted, you are a true troll.

Other uses of NPOV

Fox News definitely uses a NPOV. They constantly remind us that they’re “fair and balanced”, so they must be telling the truth. Fox News would nevar lie, not at all.

A calm, rational opinion on NPOV, as told by a true gentleman

Neutral point of view sucks ok.
Nobody ever comes to the internet with out a goddamned motherfucking point of view to spout off okay? So this bullshit about being neutral? It brings up more bullshit than it's worth. And plus people think that not having a point of view on a subject makes you more reliable. No, it makes you more stupid is what it does. I don't trust you if you aren't spouting off about something. Yell. Scream. Do something. Just don't fucking tell me that i'm not being neutral. There's no such fucking thing so

STFU

See Also

Neutral point of view is part of a series on

Wikipedia

Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.

Retrieved from "http://edramatica.com/index.php?title=Neutral_point_of_view&oldid=88342"