View source for Talk:Conservatism

It's hard to be satirical about politics and not sound biased. E.g. The Daily Show. --[[User:Praxlor|Praxlor]] 06:48, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

The only party an ED user should align himself with is the [[dramacrat|'''DRAMA'''crat party]],using unfunny terms which are only funny to haters of the aforementioned political party/politician is cancerous and shits on the good name of ED. The unfunny fags who would rather push their own agenda (make articles of things they hate more [[butthurt|negative]] and [[unfunny|less funny]],make articles of things they love more [[USI|positive]] and [[unfunny|less funny]]) than add to humor deserve to be sent back to [[uncyclopedia]].  [[User:JohnathanNiggers|JohnathanNiggers]] 22:14, 15 October 2011 (CEST)


Yeah, I had always thought ED was about Lulz, drama, trolling, and the delicious tears of angry people everywhere.  ED is an equal opportunity lulz generator.  Anything that achieves the maximum amount of trollin == the best way to write the article.  Anything that detracts == fail.  Thus you write the "conservative" article from the painfully naive/hypocritical/ignorant liberal douche POV, and the "liberal" article from the insane/tinfoil hat/"la la la not listening" conservative POV.[[User:Coolnigga420|Coolnigga420]] 07:06, 10 February 2012 (EST)