Talk:Equivamp

August

Writings

Those aren't my writings (my only fanfic is located at the account KilaBrija), I broke up with Branden, and I don't use MSPaint. ;_; Equivamp^{talk(Troll me here)} 08:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

I got the fanfic from your DevaintArt. 08:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Oh I thought it was a Twilight one. Carry on. Equivamp^{talk(Troll me here)} 08:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

You can edit this too, just don't make it suck. 08:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Content suggestion

I remember something about Equivamp being in an internet sissyfight with someone or other, screencaps and images of that would be a valuable addition. Totensiediefurfag 23:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Who, this fag? Okay. I don't have screencaps, but I don't think he's deleted anything, so I'll try to find some links. Equivamp^{talk(Troll me here)} 23:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Link Dump

• Where it all started
  • GreenReaper moved most of it here
• Official response to me adding five words to his article
  • continued here
• He thinks I'm an old man

Images

Equivamp has a crush on me. It's true. She's just being tsun-tsun. Asexual furfanss are hot for their fellows. I expect the wedding in under a decade. Ty 05:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Anyway seriously, added a bunch of images from the deviantart that pertain to the lulzy fursonas and all that, what with them looking all sexy-like. I divided it into subcategories and was wondering, the images already featured throughout the articles as thumbnails, should I just merge those in too? None seem to stand out more than the others. The ones featured she's using as a sig anyway so people have probably seen them prominently enough. ^Ty_Talk 07:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

The problem is that there are no other images in the content sections. Maybe move a few back? 00:03, 27 August 2011 (CEST)

Since things are being deleted...

Can I have the non-fursona zebras removed, please? It's kind of pointless to have everything I've ever drawn on here. (The non-fursonas don't have wings). Equivamp^{talk(Troll me here)} 23:03, 26 August 2011 (CEST)

• File:EquivampZebraJediQuilLibria.jpg is not a zebra pegasus, as the gallery title implies, nor s it a fursona of mine. User:Equivamp 18:52, 30 August 2011

The intent was to display related artwork, potential precursors that evolved into the fursona, it's relevant. You posted this after deleting it too, there's a blank spot in the gallery, it could be restored. ^Ty_Talk 02:14, 3 September 2011 (CEST)

This topic (thanks for deleting my reply BTW, pretty sure that should be against some kind of rule) refers to the deletion of 3 human images by Junius, if I recall correctly, which I had uploaded with links to their source on DA. 1 & 2 were RL pics that looked slightly younger than other pics which she'd labelled as "modelling". 3 was a hand illustration of a random girl. They were posted because they were drama-inducing, and clearly since they got the biggest reaction, this only proves that point. ^Ty-c_al 08:26, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

October

Contemplating rescinding

Regarding User_talk:Equivamp/Archive3#RE:_Hey, looking back, I don't see what's so bad about adding images to the page or adding the content. So I'm going to run this by JT and Meep/Thayo. I mean, your fursonas are lulzy. I would like to propose adding these to the article too: File:Bovine.jpg, File:Equivampbabyrainbou.jpg, File:Pokesona.jpg, File:MonaKetra.jpg. "uploading irrelevant, copious, and copywritten images of mine without my permission (which is against policy anyway)" IS THIS REAL!? ^Ty-c_al 08:51, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

You may go ahead and add those drawings to the article. --JuniusThaddeus 19:49, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

Meep's additions

There may be overlap where multiple things refer to same, but there's cow fursona guy, mate guy, DNide4Evr, perpa, junius and yourself to add as potential suspects too :p Also that trikiwiki guy prob. ^Ty-c_al 09:10, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

Can you plz do this? It doesn't feel right for me :/ 09:17, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

Nope, I promised not to edit it. Sort of skirted that by altering your numerical estimation. Anywho it's not important, you just kept ranting on IRC about these other guys being creepers (too) and I wan't to be aware and Batman them. ^Ty-c_al 09:30, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

If I photoshopped Equivamp fucking Zach Braff in his ass

Would any of you pay me? SWfan 17:23, 7 February 2013 (EST)

Your blatant pedophilia is very concerning.

This whole article is boring as hell, I mean you could pretty well just replace it with this: Generic Furry Article and get the same effect.

--Onideus 20:14, 24 April 2013 (EDT)

SWfan is younger than me. Equivamp^talk 20:16, 24 April 2013 (EDT)

Technically it's still pedophilia. There are a number of teens doing jail time and permanently labeled as "sex offenders" because they took pictures of ~themselves~ and posted them around online. Kinda messed up, but that's the way the goofy laws are. I guess his being younger than you makes sense, I mean given the quality/relevance of this article...it reads like it was written by a spastic tweenage muppet fuck whose all buttmad and angsty cause his parents took away his Playstation or something. --Onideus 20:22, 24 April 2013 (EDT)

Why would I ever post nude pics of myself? 07:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Also, according to your biography on wikifur wiki, you are currently underaged too. If SWfan is younger than you, then he is deserving of a underage template on his user page. I'll meddlesomely add that to his user page if you do not mind. LIATBuster30011 20:29, 24 April 2013 (EDT)

DO IT FAGGOT. 07:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Sure this article needs improvement but it is better than most of furnigger articles. Maybe that isn't saying much. The real lesson is don't use the same username for WikiFur and Encyclopedia Dramatica. Someone will notice and possibly write about you. I wonder how many members of this group are over 40? 08:11, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

It's not about "improvement", it's about a lack of interest. It's the difference between someone with an adult baby fetish and someone with an adult baby fetish who runs around asking complete strangers online to send them their toddler's left-over USED diapers so that they can stuff them into their frilly girly panties whilst parading around Hot Topic:

...and, by the way, ~that~ person doesn't even ~have~ an article yet. See what I mean? QUALITY! Ya gotta LOOK FOR IT! I mean in the adult baby community alone there are an estimated TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND participants worldwide...do we ~really~ need to make some over bloated generic boring ass article for ~every~ single freakin one of them? And furries...holy Christ, there's MILLIONS of the lil bastards! Most so overly cliche and boring that anything that ~could~ be said about them has ~already~ been said about them in the main Furry article.

I can understand it too if you've got a major, raging hardon for somebody too and you want to build them a little shrine to your epic butthurt indignance...I get that, I do, my own article is the direct product of that. The DIFFERENCE is that the kooky little nut jobs who have contributed to ~my~ article have gone ~well~ out of their way to MAKE UP some half-way decent material. I mean fer fuck sakes, how gawd damn shitting difficult is it to make a forgery? You find some random kooky, off the wall message board, you sign up using their name and then you post a bunch of outlandish, whacky, kook ridden bullshit, screen cap it and then plaster it all over their article whilst furiously rubbin at yer little pecker. How the fuck complicated does this need to be?

--Onideus 13:13, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

If it was up to me a lot of articles would be removed due to unfunny. Including this one. But that isn't the case and I assume there is a good reason for that. So I work within the parameters defined by those in charge. Never heard of this user but noticed a discussion in recent changes. The only reason I said anything was SWFan doesn't seem to have tunnel vision when it comes to his contributions. That's a pet peeve of mine 13:31, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Well a lot of articles like this exist because they say more about the squirrely little doorknobs who made them than they do about the person ~in~ the article. But there has been a ~definite~ downturn in quality over the past 5 years or so. Most people now, I don't know if it's because they're just drugged up on too much Ritalin or what, but it's like they're just not even ~trying~ anymore. Blatant attack articles do have their place on ED, but not when they're overly generic inconsequential shit smears of a lack of effort. We're starting to develop a nasty reputation in that regard as well, like if you look at the "needed/proposed" page, the vast majority of suggestions are, "Hurr hurr, there's this fag I hate that made fun of me, he's a furry and he lives in his parent's basement, lollololz, make fun of him for me!"

--Onideus 13:44, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

After reviewing these articles I know the feeling. Then again I have lurked ED since it started and never once did I worry about quality and whatnot. If something sucked then I simply found something else to read. Sometimes I have to remind myself of that 13:59, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Actually, the article existed before SWfan came here. I don't really have a problem with any of his edits (except the one in which he said, "known troll SWfan", lol). In fact, I'm the one who added the link to the babyfur dA group. Equivamp^talk 08:41, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

>except the one in which he said, "known troll SWfan", lol

The edit you have a problem with should definitely stay 08:48, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Someone else removed it for usi. Equivamp^talk 08:53, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

08:55, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

17:09, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

*golf clap*

Not sure exactly what you did to this kid Equivamp but it looks like you're managing to rack up death threats/wishes from the lil sperg. LOL You know you've tipped on over the edge of infuriated butt rage when you start pining for the death of random strangers on the freakin Internet. I think somebody might need to phone up this kid's junior high school and his parents to discuss his "anger issues" online. He's startin to look like another Nevada Tan in the making. See, this is why little kids DON'T belong on the Internet. --Onideus 17:32, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Lol that wasn't a death threat. I just wanted to see if that would offend anyone. P.S. I'm an EDitor, so why would I want to cause unnecessary trouble and get myself banned? 17:50, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

By the context you used of the picture, it imply that is might be what you have in mind for her. Even if your intent is to only meant to offend her, it look very disturbing to be that way. I just saying. LIATBuster30011 18:15, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

You make good point. I no do that no more. It very bad when I do that. 18:21, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

I think the better question is ~why~ is he trying to "offend" her in the first place? Sounds like he's got some kind of deranged elementary school boy crush on her or something. Instead of trying to pull her hair or steal her crayons he's posting wanton death fantasies. The boy has somethin ~seriously~ tha'fawk wrong with his brain if you ask me. --Onideus 18:22, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

I actually just like seeing how people react to things such as that. Next time I thing I'll just link someone to the offended page though, lol. 18:29, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Maybe she is kind of cute or something? That is what I am thinking. But disregard that, I believe he learn already from my valid point I made to him. LIATBuster30011 18:36, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

>Implies that any heterosexual man on the face of the planet would think of that thing as being attractive in any way. 18:44, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

19:09, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Oh yeah, he's got a *MAJOR* crush on her. LOL --Onideus 19:12, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Lol.

19:15, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Electric Boogaloo

what the fuck is going on here Equivamp^talk 19:17, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

A lolocaust. 19:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

I am currently being offended by the above image. • Mr.Jonzz 19:24, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Who doesn't get an erection from it? C'mon, guise. Nothing to be ashamed of. 19:32, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Hey!

This article isn't lulz just yet, but its coverage can spark a lollercoaster. You can help by reverting people who delete shit, and vandalizing their user pages. See this article on Google? Want to add something? Join us!

This discussion shall become the next AOTN! 19:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

The talk page is better than the article itself. LOL --Onideus 19:38, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

HELP FUEL ED Don't let this discussion end!

^ 19:40, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

SWfan likes this. 19:45, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

-hipcrime 19:24, 26 April 2013 (EDT)

19:36, 26 April 2013 (EDT)

13:04, 27 April 2013 (EDT)