Jeremy Bernal

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>PsychopathUltimate at 14:12, 24 October 2011. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Would you - outside of this interview - use the word "furry" to describe your own art?

"A furry I am not!"

Furry, only in the sense of visual art, yes, though I would not describe myself as one who is a 'furry'. I like the art, and I believe I am good at drawing it, but a furry I am not.-- Bernal in denial


Looks shopped to me...

Jeremy Bernal is a self-important trace artist who spends his free time sucking money out of the pockets of gullible basement-dwelling furries with his over-protected website, SexyFur.

According to Sexyfur "all models are over 18", which is simple considering that he uses one model for EVERYTHING. That's right- every single abomination on that site is simply a trace of the same damned girl with a random animal head, some poorly-drawn muscles and some photoshop effects thrown on. Don't believe us? Check out the gallery. Apparently furries are too stupid to notice that every single picture is of the same girl.

Making it worse, every drawing is actually a trace of a digital photograph previously taken with poorly-done shading and some photoshop effects tossed on to try to hide it. Yes, furries are paying for flat-faced, badly-drawn tracings of a real girl who probably isn't all that hot anymore considering how long Sexyfur has been gobbling money up.

Catching on that Sexyfur is a total rippoff, Sibe, Shii, and Nathanr posted his pictures of Fine Furry Art for free, interrupting his supply of the furry equivalent of hookers and blow. But no, he was not content to just angst and whine like a normal furry when someone posted his poorly-drawn art without his permission! To protect his intellectual property, he issued DMCA notices to sites like WTFux, WTFur, 4chan, 7chan, and the The Russian LJ Abuse Conspiracy for posting his "copyrighted artwork".

Bernal BAWWed about not making money off his poorly-made smut, and tried to turn most of Furrydom against those who spread his art for free. A few retards jumped on the bandwagon and began riding furiously, but most people don't give a fuck as free porn is always better than porn you have to pay for, especially when the quality is as shitty as Bernal's art is. To this day the rest of the internet sees Bernal as a whiny blowhard who really needs to learn how to shop better, or at least stop tracing the same girl over and over again, marking it as "new weekly art".

Comments from the furries shitty, rejected artist Cuprohastes


"1.Ears do not grow from the back of the skull. They are concave, not solid cones.

2.Horses do not have large oval cheek ruffs that extend out several inches from the face, yet also appear to be behind the mane, which on an equine, runs down the centre-line of the neck.

3.Hair does not normally grow in a closed loop. A horse's mane also does not commonly grow out of one ear.

4.This is a nicely drawn mouth for an anteater. Not so much for a horse.

5.You seem to have drawn two necks and forgotten which one you’re using. Pro-tip, one head, one neck. Also someone seems to have broken this character’s neck and left it at an odd, dislocated angle. This may explain the expression of comatose slackness."

Although this set of pro tips would have been epic win, if the furry in question

What follows this quote is a stream of people correcting Cuprohastes' corrections; If one analyzes the anatomy from the example given above, it's clearly apparent that;

1. Equine ears do come right out at the top of their skull; they're about 4" apart, they do taper to a point and protrude from nearly the most dorsal-posterior part of the skull. Those are a bit close together and indeed are poorly detailed. But I digress.

2. If you take a good look at a horse's skull you'll notice that the rear of their jaw actually has a large upside down arch. That could be what Bernal was trying to depict here. Though from this drawing, it's still highly exaggerated. even if you did add the fat and muscle groups on top, which still makes it look strange.

3. Obviously she's not feral. Anybody with half a brain could figure out that the hair is groomed.

4. Equine mouths are relatively tiny compared to the size of their head. Along with #2, those items are really more artistic license and caricature.

5. The supposed "secondary neck" Cuprohastes pointed out is actually the Trapezius muscle; notice how it arks over to the shoulder. It's a large kite-shaped muscle on the upper back. Of course if Cuprohastes knew anything about anatomy himself, he'd have known that. Not to mention that Bernal uses a model for his artwork, so even if he doesn't understand human anatomy, his "artwork" is technically anatomically correct, given that he's rotoscoping an image of an actual human being.

Cuprohastes rebuttals amount to nothing more than tl;dr or failing to acknowledge any points made in the arguments against him and going out of his way to insult the people he's trying to garner sympathy from.

Pinkuh Wrote: Hell I worked for them and they tried to push me around, rejected perfectly good art, and in general went around being ass hats.

Octan: Didn't she (pinkuh) just start working for them like a month ago or so? Seem to remember it being mentioned somewheres. Talk about a fast turnaround.

Examples!

What the morons are paying for... About missing Pics
[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

External links

Jeremy Bernal is part of a series on

Furfaggotry

Visit the Furfaggotry Portal for complete coverage.