User talk:Wnt

Wikipedia

Obviously, you're trying to get use b& from wikipedia and the whole damn wikimedia shit. We just barely got a mention on german wikipedia. You even got mentioned on BL discussion. Don't be a moron TKN 02:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

(Parsing "get us banned", "blacklist") I didn't start that fire. That started at Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica without my assistance, and they proposed the ban on ED.ch links. The edit they referenced at their blacklist discussion ([1]) is sort of its own solution. Don't accuse me of being for you or against you - this is for the Erisian Liberation Front. B) Wnt 03:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Heh, I see you reverted that edit. There's no point to that - WP links to the diff which is still there. I don't know - do you think ED has an educational mission? Fuck, it doesn't matter how small and puny and weak the thing is you want to build - there's still some Wiki deletionist trying to screw it up. Wnt 03:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Advise

DoNotWant was going too but he is asleep and/or dead. So you should change the advise to

I kinda missed the meaning there. Since the site was down (maybe it'll be down again?) I think some Article of the Naos should be named right off, whether they're a good idea or not. Someone can always revert and start from scratch if they want. Wnt 04:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

SimonKirby / TGcomix

They're the same person, yet they're in two separate columns. Is this intentional? --JuniusThaddeus 00:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

No, not at all. I don't have any clue what the fuck I'm talking about, or else I wouldn't write this down! All the people involved probably care too much. Still, any juicy bits of intel you can provide will decrease the chance of epic fail by over 1/9000th. Wnt 00:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Thx Man

I think using it as picture of the nao would be pretty appropriate, since, for once its a pretty current event (similar to the Royal Wedding article of the nao). If no one else does them I think you're safe to add them. I will check through my library of lulz to see what I can dig up on possible future ones.

A quick note

I notice you have been making several of the articles of the day, and good job with that. But please stop adding the "alert code" as it is very unnecessary.

Meepsheep

15:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Understood. We shall work on improving our operational security. B) Wnt 22:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

templates

nice templates but what is the use of the techadj? H64 11:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, that's a metaphysical question... Wnt 23:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

dont make shit templates like fart plz H64 16:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Yah, that was supposed to be grandiloquent, turned out wimpyloquent. It was supposed to create a "time bomb" that appeared on a talk page only after 10 people had edited it... but it turns out that when a template contains a live "subst:", every single template all the way back to the source evaluates it in one go. So I only get a one turn delay. Wnt 19:30, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

Some confusion

Can you please view the following message in order to avoid some confusion? http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=Encyclopedia_Dramatica:Thizzlehat_Junction_Center&diff=332941&oldid=332787. Sorry. --JuniusThaddeus 22:45, 2 February 2012 (EST)

Personal Penis

The original song is "Personal Jesus" by Depeche Mode. [2] [3]. SuicideTwins 16:49, 9 February 2012 (EST)

Nah, that can't possibly be right. That's just some cheap evangelistic Christian rock knockoff of the real song, obviously. Wnt 14:22, 12 April 2012 (EDT)

I hope you don't mind

I'm cleaning the wanted pages list so I removed the pipe for Brainworms. I also put some <s>'s you can feel free to remove, but I'd really like the pipes gone if you don't mind. Mike the Græt (Talk) 21:42, 25 February 2012 (EST)

Lucky for me, I flaked off and can't remember what this is about. Wnt 14:23, 12 April 2012 (EDT)

Well I hope you stick around this time. Mike the Great (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2012 (EDT)

Npov apology

It's hard to shed the Wikipedia mindset, tend to write things too neutrally to the point where there may be a lack of humour. I leave it to you to jazz it up sir. ^Ty_c 00:37, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

I keep reading such strange shit in the news (see some of the links from Heterophobia), I feel like I'm losing track of the difference between reality and comedy sometimes. I'll note my edit here in case inspiration takes me later. Wnt 01:17, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

So I happened upon this old debate you commented on. As your user page lists me as a 'wikipedophile' (exploding thumbnails?) I thought to engage you in some conversation. When you speak of "people who have distributed child porn and advocate pedophilia while inviting kids to websites they run" do you believe me to be included in this group? I can assure you I don't do any of those three things. I maintain that my ban from all the wikimedia projects has been illegal according to their own policies. You say the project is undermined if people "let it be said": but people always say stuff. I think justice should be dealt with on its own terms ignoring gossip.

Though they may not censor all references, ArbCom's past claims that I "self-identified" or whatever are pure bullshit. They point me to made-up posts that I never made, I've inquired and been told who made those accounts and who made those posts. This whole 'outside wiki activity' is too presumptuous and too easily allows impersonators to condemn years of work. ^Ty_c 06:14, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

Hey, my user page here is 100% fact! ;) And yours might make a person wonder, at least, if he'd been locked in an asylum ward which, in violation of international conventions on human rights, was completely deprived of access to 4chan. (Actually, I don't read 4chan much, since I figure if anything good gets posted sooner or later it will turn up here) From several minutes of diligent research, I'm getting the impression that some folks at evil-unveiled think you might be one of those people; as they run an independent knockoff of WikiSposure, which was a project of Corporate Sex Offenders, which was an offshoot of Perverted Justice, and some of those people actually once spoke to the folks at NBC's "To Catch A Predator",^[4] so obviously, these are world experts who must be taken seriously.

On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog - I don't really know anything about you. Certainly I don't know of any compelling evidence on the point. While ED makes a point of lulzy stunts like this, I'll strike the now-getting-old mention of you on the userpage if it's actually bothering you. But if it does, well, maybe you should revise your user page a tad?

To be clear, I do not approve of sexual abuse of children. But I refuse to be told not to joke about it. Our government is out there shoveling money at private contractors so they can peddle young boys to Afghan warlords. Nobody should be telling you not to click on a thumbnail. Wnt 01:10, 26 April 2012 (EDT)

Actually, I just tuned into this "Catch a Predator" program - looks like they have a butthurt assembly line going such as has rarely been assembled outside of the police force. And they actually name this Perverted Justice group as a volunteer group working with them. And it looks like this group had a hard-on for you when it was still affiliated with them. So this actually looks 100% more serious than the bull people talk about on Jimbo Wales' user page where they're alleging Commons is full of child porn every two weeks. Still, I don't see anything in that history version that specifically alleges any of those three things you mention. And despite those quotations, pedophilia is actually defined by Wikipedia (and, they say, two psychiatric standards) as interest in children 13 years of age or younger, so that doesn't match either.

Nonetheless, reading this and considering the stuff you like here, there's obviously something going on which I would view as pathological - I don't believe that pedophilia is normal even in the loosest sense (by which I include not just "hebephilia" but much of socially accepted and recommended sexuality - it is not natural to assume that adults should lose interest in each other when they get to be 50, or 40, or 30, and chase after kids right out of high school). I don't believe it's a 'sexual orientation'; I think that the true sexual orientations have widespread distribution in nature and an evolutionary purpose. Rather, there are specific neural lesions that can cause it - in rare cases, probably not usually - including low white matter volume in the superior fronto-orbital fasciculus and the right arcuate fasciculus. [5][6][7][8][9] (I wonder if there's a virus, akin to the adenoviruses that cause obesity, that does damage to this region of the brain in kids who are abused making them vulnerable to catch the disease themselves; but, a pure psychological mechanism that it's just too hurtful for them to think about sex might also account for it, etc.)

The model that makes sense to me looking at that data is that there is a process of updating the objects of sexual desire which requires neural activity ("thought", in some general sense) using these parts of the brain. I remember that as a child, for a brief time (3 to 5) I found adults most attractive, then, abruptly at age 6-7, children my own age ("puppy love", they called it), and then moved back forward again slowly in pace with my own development, continuing throughout life to the present day. I presume pedophiles, hebephiles, etc. differ from this simply because they encounter some block to this process of updating which hinders its normal operation. But --- things in the brain are very rarely 100%. They haven't had massive strokes, they don't have a crowbar through their head. A weak neural activity, or one which is repressed by some psychological mechanism, should still be able to be rehabilitated, just as many patients with partial paralysis from stroke with a little physical therapy are able to start walking again.

Now in case this conversation comes of interest to someone, I should add that the thing I would really like to see tested on the pedophile patients is the use of pheromones. To me, major sexual transitions have generally been linked with these. (There's even a certain amount of actual science backing this up) I was pure heterosexual before around my fifth birthday I smelled the sweat of a boy undergoing puberty. And I never considered "Orientals" (as we called them in those days) to be even relevant sexually, until working near such a woman under the influence of the scent of a large breeding colony of mice, which had such a strong female-specific effect on me that it was seriously distracting. Six months later I was downloading Asian pr0n off the internets. ;) These exposures had a very fast-acting, short term effect, but just three or four times and there was a long term change in perception, which was then consolidated over months to years afterward. And in our society, pheromones - part of the natural birthright of man from time immemorial - have been very nearly denied to us by frequent bathing and other anti-underarm offensives. So I can picture that in those with a weak mechanism in the brain, the lack of this basic stimulus could further damage sexual development. While it sounds wacky, do note that the gay bomb is not just an ED article (though I'm skeptical that true heterosexuals would smell a male pheromone at all).

So I would suggest that if anybody around here actually is affected by hebephilia or the like, then (s)he should consider going to a gym or the like, where it is possible to lie down on a sweaty weight-lifting bench and get thoroughly covered in the fragrant sweat of one's fellow humans of the same age. No large fees or legal issues required! I hypothesize (though I have no proof) that such an exposure, in the presence of such physically attractive people, should start to reprogram their affections toward a more normal result. I wish I had the standing in psychological matters to pursue such research... (No doubt if someone tried this approach whole hog, no half measures, flying pedophiles out to Vegas to douse them with pheromones and treat them to therapy sessions with professional sex workers, it would be one of those infamous studies the Republicans would complain about as a waste of money for the next 20 years... and yet, it sure is cheaper than jailing someone for six months, or giving a child psychological examinations!) Wnt 10:14, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

magnotta

1. Magnotta destroyed his own life. hell, he wrote the original article.
2. ew. have you seen the pix of magnotta? pukepukepuke
3. the facebook group tracked him down, not in an effort to 'treat kittens like people', but instead, to track down a man who put two kittens in a vacuum bag, then sucked out the air, filmed this act, then uploaded it to youtube. magnotta successfully trolled the animal rights groups, and got his name out there.

magnotta has zero sympathy from me, although i am unconvinced of his guilt (complicity, probably), and i suspect Wikipedia has a real problem on their hands with their article on this guy. it's going to be one hell of a trial. in b4 magnotta pulls out some exculpatory evidence long after the murderer (or accomplice) has escaped and got plastic surgery. tldr: i reverted your edits to Luka Magnotta. -hipcrime 09:13, 6 February 2013 (EST)

I think you missed the point. Basically, America is owned by the rich. The rich own the oil wells. Oil is used, weight per weight, to create food, plastics, pharmaceutical pills, condoms, all the necessities of life. Oil comes out of the ground from machines. So what do you do with the people? You have to find work for them somehow. The pretty ones, you assign to blowjobs. A couple are injected down blown-out wells to stop the spill. Most of them, you need to grind up and turn into dog food to serve at animal shelters for the poor mistreated pets of celebrities who went nuts. Some of them can run the dog food grinders. And then there's one more class they need, the class of Cop Enforcers to go out and spy on and lock up everybody else to keep the system running. Now if they have to, the rich will pay Cop Enforcers up to $10 an hour. But if people here go out and do law enforcement for free, they duh ain't gonna pay 'em. So they have to be dog food, or maybe make dog food. So obviously, for every person on ED who tracks down a kitten huffer, there's some schmuck getting fed to a bichon frise whose celeb owner forgot to pay the air conditioning bill for its doghouse. Hmmm, now why was that a problem? Wnt 21:52, 22 February 2013 (EST)

Lol

"Ask them what any artist has to do to get airplay and a record contract in Hollywood. Then ask what a little boy has to do." I liked that, that shit was funny haha just wanted to let u know. --TROLAHOAR 08:32, 10 March 2014 (EDT)

Ukraine

HEY THERE! Hey, Wnt! I saw what you did with the Ukraine. I just wanted to say keep up the good work.

--JuniusThaddeus 07:54, 12 March 2014 (EDT)

Peoria

Moved to your userspace, abandoned draft. Uberfukken 23:53, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

And I noticed that Peoria has been deleted. If you need assistance with this article let me know. Something that could help is internet relevance. Maybe some funny quotes, pictures, facts, etc... EDIT: Please respond on my talk page. ^reply 13:19, 29 August 2014 (EDT)

Someones been altering the wikipedia page histories on Ryulongs talk page

It's probably David Gerard, who told me he could erase me from RationalWiki on a whim. I thought I had more evidence, but the only examples I know of are that I had to ask him for permission to add super sentai power rangers and ultraman as subcategories of size change in fiction; and that his revision of super sentai on March 16th 2014 was prompted by someone comparing him to me and Ryulong saying I'm a "fucktard". He's probably done it multiple times as he has a short temper.

Oh yeah, David Gerard forgot to remove slaveholder from Muhammad before having the category deleted in a day; but did it for all the presidents. Neither he nor Ryulong seemed to think rape is unremitting horror like slavery I guess. He also owns the genetic engineering article at RationalWiki and thinks genetic patents and the 150 some human animal chimeras in the U.K. aren't worth mentioning.

Sorry I don't have any screenshots, calling Ryulong on this got me banned from RationalWiki, and now I'm out of Wiki's. Time to do something else.

CensoredScribe 16:32, 11 January 2015 (EST)