Encyclopedia Dramatica:Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/5

Possible QOTN

	“	<NegiSpringfield> Seisatsu: I have dickpicks on ED <NegiSpringfield> it's not that bad	„

Graufuchs 04:04, 26 September 2011 (CEST)

I've got a QOTN

	“	Aon's sthould tsay n tge *Chaans, theuy shoujdnt b i oukr Robolx Fodum! Tey aways ate a sem o eb noobso, nad thy shougld bte banngd frm postng, hwo alrees wih mz? I thnk thsoe whwo g aoround promotineg 4wChan szould eb autobanneqd andd Ponisoned.	„
	—Jaredvaldez2, displaying the general intelligence of the roblox community in one simple quote.

What do you think? Reply if you like. - Another n00b 19:51, 25 September 2011 (CEST)

Lost me at "Tey aways ate a sem o eb noobso" Forthelulz 14:01, 12 October 2011 (CEST)

Do we really need another QOTN?

	“	The internet, a massive database of vast and limitless knowledge; a revolutionary tool which grants its users access to all the world's history and know-how. Who am I kidding, the internet is for goatse, furries, calling each other ugly, bickering endlessly about shit nobody gives a cockadoodleassshitsuckinballfuck about and Encyclopedia Dramatica. Round and round the intarnets we go!	„
	—Gaia Online user vaginal vomit, sharing wisdom about the internet.

Forthelulz 13:33, 12 October 2011 (CEST)

More QOTN?

	“	<Explodingpiglets> I am feeling exceptionally gay today	„

User:omegaism talk 4:28 September 18, 2011 (EST)

Quote of the now?

	“	Explodingpiglets pulls your muzzle into his own and slithers his tongue into your mouth, wrapping it around your. You then feel his paw slide into your pants, and down into your crotch, where you feel him give it a little tickle	„

	“	<Explodingpiglets> SON F A BITCH	„

	“	<rst8> lol	„

	“	<Explodingpiglets> EVERYBODY TYPE /CLEAR	„

	“	<DGTrixie> no.	„

looool User:omegaism talk 9:17 September 16, 2011 (EST)

QOTN?

	“	<ChaosLord> I JACKED TO FCHAN THE OTHER DAY.	„

Equivamp^talk^{(Troll me here)} 01:05, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

He was to exited about it, attention whore level really. Is he active on the forums or just IRC? Also, BTW you can change the QOTN or add one yourself. 01:10, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

I thought it was sysops only? o:

Equivamp^talk^{(Troll me here)} 01:12, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

Pretty sure you can, I would ask first though. Also, I need to stop stalking #ed-logging 01:19, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

"Feral Furries"

Does the general furry article make mention of these sick fucks? And if so, or not, should they get their own article? Or maybe just redirect "feral furry" to the bestiality page? From what I gather, it's basically a pseudonym they use to try and "blend in" with the furries, to make themselves seem like less of the sick fucks they are. Similar in the way that pedophiles will sometimes poorly disguise themselves as teenbaby "caretakers" in order to try and molest them. --Onideus 19:38, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

Should have its own article. You know, like how Furvert and Furry are two seperate articles?

Equivamp^talk^{(Troll me here)} 22:42, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

Well, everything else is extremely segregated by specification to provide as much trolling as possible. Why would you start grouping things now, man? It cuts down on the amount of humour available on this site. IrksomeReturn 05:45, 22 September 2011 (CEST)

Help with 2 articles

This and this - you're a newfag if you found either one new to you. - Vinland 17:30, 4 September 2011 (CEST)

How can I upload multiple files at the same time?

Thanks in advance. --Polmas 19:56, 4 September 2011 (CEST)

There used to be a special page that let you upload multiple files, but it is no longer in use. You have to upload files individually now. Lui galaxy 20:02, 4 September 2011 (CEST)

K Thanks, nice guy. --Polmas 20:08, 4 September 2011 (CEST)

RC

Why do the Recent Changes look different when I'm not logged in? Equivamp^talk^{(Troll me here)} 04:17, 5 September 2011 (CEST)

You probably have enhanced recent changes checked, along with some other options.-- -brxbrx 22:48, 6 September 2011 (CEST)

suggested QOTN

Baya Rae 4.9K: If there's no physical violence then it's not rape, it's coercion. It's legally rape, but not rape-rape.

From the "what is your opinion of me" thread over on EDF. It just seems like the kind of quote that sums up ED. Moscow 08:59, 10 September 2011 (CEST)

QOTN

[4:29] <~zaiger> i bet if you set her [Sherrod] on fire she would burn for weeks — Preceding comment added by Solarra (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

Linking issue

I have been seeing a lot of bad links that look like this b. While this looks like a good links when you preview the page, it is a dead link. Mediawiki tries to send you to http://b/. To fix this, simply pipe the page to a page with out the preceding slash. All pages that have a slash as the first char have this issue. Ex: /b/-day Vs /b/-day

[[b/|/b/]]

21:55, 11 September 2011 (CEST)

It does that if you click on it from the recent changes, too; for example, co leads me to http://co.com

Equivamp^talk 00:38, 12 September 2011 (CEST)

Comment found in wikicode

I found this in a boxxy gallery wikicode as a comment, It made me laugh, so here it is:

  07:37, 13 September 2011 (CEST)

                   YOUR SHITTY BOXXY SHOP GOES AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE GALLERY.

            
                   I swear to fucking god I will ban you for not adhering to this.
                  

                             I CHECK EVERY EDIT. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Report: Big Telcos Fucking You and Your Phone

You don't have to read more than a couple of pages of this report to know who "Carrier A" and "Carrier B" are. For years, much of the hacking community has know about how AT&T used their corporate powers for domestic spying. But both carriers are guilty of draining the charge out of your battery intentionally. Get ready for some lulzy denial.--SadMonkey 19:15, 13 September 2011 (CEST)

Ohhhhh boy. I can see the shitstorm heading for this miles away. - Vinland 22:15, 13 September 2011 (CEST)

- Vinland 17:20, 18 September 2011 (CEST)

Scarlett Johansson's phone "hacked", noodz leaked

I'll just leave this here. SuicideTwins 23:40, 16 September 2011 (CEST)

my trolling

What the fuck is this? Forthelulz 13:37, 12 October 2011 (CEST)

trolling

Alright, I admit it i'm trolling, i'm a bad troll, i'm a bad parody of a troll and this had been my intention from the start - i planned all this to happen.

It was all my doing, I knew that you guys on ED would catch up, I know that you said something about me on the old ED forums, and I know that I would end up with an article.

It was all my fault, I planned the entire thing, it was all part of my plan.

I was being bad at trolling on purpose, it was all part of my act.

And you all fell for it. --Darklatenightking (whose too gawd damn Jesus raping stupid to put in his own sig)

"I wuz jes trollin guv, honest I wuz!" --Onideus 15:55, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Failfag. Mammamiaomg 18:37, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

PROTIP: You're still a faggot and nobody cares. 17:59, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

TL;DR "I'm a bad troll which makes me a good one!" Forthelulz 13:39, 12 October 2011 (CEST)

Image issue

I'm probably just stupid or something, but template and the site notice images are not loading for me. For instance, , comes up as File:Ae.png. It's not an issue with my browser, or even my OS, anyone know what to do? 17:51, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Comes up as an image for me. My guess would be that you have like AdBock, NoScript, or some other hooha "security" addon or browser security setting that's preventing the images from being shown. --Onideus 18:33, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Er, scratch that, I misread, I thought you meant right there. LOL On the main page, yeah, it just comes up as text, no image. --Onideus 18:37, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Well, I looked at the image properties and it says it's "0 bytes"...I think it's cause the thumbnail has been trashed for that size. If you check the precise link it comes up dead as well: http://images.encyclopediadramatica.ch/thumb/5/57/Ae.png/140px-Ae.png --Onideus 18:45, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

There's some minor differences between it and the others, like the "T" in "thumb" is capitalized, and it's missing the "images." in the front, rather it has "www." --Onideus 18:50, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

After the link loads I mean. --Onideus 18:51, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Alright, I'll screw around some more a little bit later to see if I can fix it. However, I have the same issue with almost all templates. 18:54, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Well, it's not the code. It's like a redirect. Like the site redirecting the URL to a munged version of the URL...so if you can track down what's doing that redirect, then you should be able to fix it. --Onideus 19:04, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Sorry, was looking at the wrong page, ignore what was here before. I'll try it again on the right page, see what errors come up. --Onideus 19:16, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Here's the correct scripting error:

Error: Image corrupt or truncated: <unknown>

Source File: <unknown>

Line: 0

--Onideus 19:18, 17 September 2011 (CEST)

Moar:

We just upgraded hardware. It was because our servers couldn't handle the 10 million requests and 3 million pageviews a day we are getting. HOPEFULLY it will all be fixed in the next couple days. The site is faster already. --zaiger (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

Be honest

Is ED using the latest version of mediawiki? Cuz if we aren't upgrading would definitely help us out with the .gifs and disappearing images and whatnot. And I'm pretty sure the software is free.-- -brxbrx 21:19, 18 September 2011 (CEST)

version is here. the gif issue looks a lot like a similar issue experienced by OhInternet early on. in that instance, it was a caching issue. -hipcrime 21:37, 18 September 2011 (CEST)

My, that is dated. May I suggest updating to version 1.17? You'd be doing it for the sake of the lulz.-- -brxbrx 21:47, 18 September 2011 (CEST)

it's unlikely to help. i believe the image issue is a caching issue, and using teh latest of anything isn't always the best. :P -hipcrime 22:00, 18 September 2011 (CEST)

Well, you would know better than me. Thanks for indulging me-- -brxbrx 22:03, 18 September 2011 (CEST)

It's these kinds of issues (gifs disappearing, etc..) that should be posted to my userpage. -- Edgeworth E. Euler 03:35, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

The .gif problem is that you can't resize them-- -brxbrx 03:41, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

The issue has been fixed, I've invalidated three levels of thumbnail caches allowing the .gif thumbnails to be regenerated, as seen below: -- Edgeworth E. Euler 04:25, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

Sweet. Thanks, man. Now the tits article can finally look proper.-- -brxbrx 04:29, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

NP. A lot of images/thumbnails are still 404'ing, but that will all be fixed in an hour or two. -- Edgeworth E. Euler 04:41, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

We need a 500 Server Error and 404 Page Not Found page.

If any of you are relatively good at HTML, and want to design a webpage that shall be shown at the inner-workings of ed.ch. HTML/CSS only. No javascript, and keep file size under 5kb. You can use any image on the images.ed.ch or static.ed.ch domains. -- Edgeworth E. Euler 09:40, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

will do 23:09, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

Red Linked images

Please do not delete red images out of the wikicode. Copy the link path onto the pages talk page, then comment out the link with  . Thank you 05:38, 22 September 2011 (CEST)

Half right. Don't  them out. That defeats the point of being able to see them to see if and of the images have been uploaded. It's much easier to be able to just look at the talk page and see if any images have been restored. --zaiger (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2011 (CEST)

That's what I meant, comment them out on the main page, and make a copy link on the talk page to see whats going on. 23:46, 24 September 2011 (CEST)

Fox trolled yet again on another poll

Its rear end once again erupting in flames and agony to the point it takes down its own page in a lulzy episode of childish why-can't-things-go-my-way butthurt syndrome. - Vinland 20:59, 23 September 2011 (CEST)

UPDATE: They moved it to an obscure, older date but since the poll is open, it means it's still fresh. Guess who's still winning. - Vinland 21:02, 23 September 2011 (CEST)

When archiving the TJC

Don't delete every thread/conversation/topic like what happened here. Only archive like 2/3 of the page and leave the remaining 3rd as most people are not finished with the conversations therein. Thanks.--zaiger (talk) 23:29, 23 September 2011 (CEST)

This nutter is going to arrest Obama tomorrow.

Can someone please mirror this before he deletes it? I'd do it but I'm a lazy fucker. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0UYTEIn8tE This guy may deserve an article too. Dillon Asimov 05:57, 28 September 2011 (CEST)

- He took it down, but someone mirrored it in time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oek1-K35D34 Dillon Asimov 15:12, 28 September 2011 (CEST)

Holy shit, it's future Chris-chan. How'd he get so far up there? - Vinland 19:19, 28 September 2011 (CEST)

More scientology exposure

hahaha oh wow - Vinland 01:43, 29 September 2011 (CEST)

TheAmazingAtheist loses it

- Vinland 20:18, 29 September 2011 (CEST)

Can't say I disagree with him though. --One With The Lulz 01:37, 1 October 2011 (CEST)

I disagree. They should be arrested simply for being faggots. Moarhate 18:35, 2 October 2011 (CEST)

that video has its moments in all its vulgar glory and primitive overselling of the act, but I don't like the fat guy anyway. Even if I were agreeing with him, I'd never admit it, because he is so gay. OsamaBinEinkaufen 00:24, 7 October 2011 (CEST)

Epic Win for Anonymous

http://books.google.com/books?id=cbWNirl8gsMC&q=%22encyclopedia+dramatica%22

There are two good things about the book Anons are complaining about:

It's the only real book that discusses ED in depth. According to the citations, Cole Stryker interviewed Sherrod on April 22, 2011.
It's a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards. I already added most of the useful information to Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article now discusses ED's creation and mentions mediacrat, andrewpants, and ljdrama.

--JuniusThaddeus 22:43, 30 September 2011 (CEST)

Oh man that is awesome. Thanks for going through that. He interviewed Sherrod on my birthday. --zaiger (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2011 (CEST)

Upload from URL

Why isn't that option available? Sometimes I don't want to download some creepy shit onto my hard drive just to bring it to ED, and I would like the ability to take it straight from the web. Could this option please be enabled? Thank you.-- -brxbrx 22:50, 1 October 2011 (CEST)

We had this in April then it just disappeared. 22:51, 1 October 2011 (CEST)

If you don't want it on your HD why do you think it'd be totally legit to upload it indirectly? Also, vmware is for pros. Moarhate 18:37, 2 October 2011 (CEST)

It was sysop only on .com but it was usually broken because it isn't a well coded option. Leave a note on e's talk page and he will look at it when he gets time. --zaiger (talk) 01:20, 3 October 2011 (CEST)

This will not happen, sorry. -- Edgeworth E. Euler 08:30, 8 October 2011 (CEST)

Pre tags

Could someone make the text in <pre> tags wrap around please? I don't have privs to edit the css. --zaiger (talk) 01:25, 3 October 2011 (CEST)

Done. If someone wants the pre element to behave as one normally expects, add white-space:normal to its style. --JuniusThaddeus 01:48, 3 October 2011 (CEST)

Sherrod at the ROFLCon Summit

http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/meme-machine/Content?oid=4803228 – Does anything have a transcript of what she said? I just learned about her presence there, and it took me by surprise, since as far as I'm aware, she never done events such as this before. I'm not moaning about her or anything; I'm just curious about what was said. --JuniusThaddeus 02:45, 3 October 2011 (CEST)

http://kerplow.com/item/736/roflcon-summit-2011 – This is the only reference I could find that mentions anything about what she said there. --JuniusThaddeus 14:59, 4 October 2011 (CEST)

Italian Wikipedia

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Comunicato_4_ottobre_2011/en – They're reverse-boycotting Italy by refusing to share knowledge. --JuniusThaddeus 02:22, 5 October 2011 (CEST)

When I initially read this story, in the back of my mind I was thinking "wait what does steve jobs dying have to do with italy? Did the wops kill steve!?" Damn cross-story confusion. Moarhate 18:37, 6 October 2011 (CEST)

I'm not getting this. If injunctions and censorship would help against boring shit on the internet nobody likes, then the web would be virtually empty and I could get back to work. Are Italian Jimboholics too retarded to move their site offshore? Or is it just a cheap publicity stunt at the expense of their addicted audience? OsamaBinEinkaufen 00:24, 7 October 2011 (CEST)

I'm going to write an article on this soon (tomorrow?) 05:44, 10 October 2011 (CEST)

Done 07:25, 11 October 2011 (CEST)

Nice. --JuniusThaddeus 16:03, 11 October 2011 (CEST)

Furries infiltrate French haute couture

[[1]] Yeah, it has come to this. Despicable. OsamaBinEinkaufen 00:24, 7 October 2011 (CEST)

New shock image currently making the rounds

Apparently it's got /b/ pretty shook up (even though i've seen much worse). --One With The Lulz 13:40, 9 October 2011 (CEST)

weak, I did not even wince. /b/ is a bunch of 12 year olds fapping to hentai, no wonder they got shook up.

21:14, 9 October 2011 (CEST)

Picture of the nao? --Polmas 13:02, 10 October 2011 (CEST)

Maybe it's because I've seen goatse one too many times, but this just doesn't make me cringe. Disgusting sure, but what else could one expect from a Pagan? Forthelulz 13:58, 12 October 2011 (CEST)

Shock image? Looks more like some snapshots of the usual boring gaia/wicca-shit or meh-porn. OsamaBinEinkaufen 02:38, 13 October 2011 (CEST)

Clearly, OP has NEVER seen Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back where Luke guts that creature to sleep in its carcas for warmth. Besides, that chick is hot. I'd bang her even if the horse she was sleeping in had AIDS. --SadMonkey 07:01, 25 October 2011 (CEST)

Hardly shocking. Apart from young teenagers and the credulous, you probably could look at it without cringing. Take it to offended, anyway. But yeah, it is disgusting. - Another n00b 11:37, 25 October 2011 (CEST)

DYK

The Did You Know section of the Main Page now changes every week. Make sure to help keep it updated. 05:43, 10 October 2011 (CEST)

I added a suggestion, dunno if it'll stick. - Vinland 22:14, 10 October 2011 (CEST)

Bloomberg ragequits

lol'd. - Vinland 22:14, 10 October 2011 (CEST)

UPDATE: Bloomberg: "lol j/k" - Vinland 14:19, 14 October 2011 (CEST)

OWS: "holy shit!"

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH - Vinland 05:59, 15 October 2011 (CEST)

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Those hipsters act like they've never seen someone get punched before. Forthelulz 10:53, 16 October 2011 (CEST)

Either that lunatic was like "FML I just KO'd a hipster doing nothing" or he was adjusting his hat. I'm thinking it's the latter. - Vinland 21:36, 16 October 2011 (CEST)

Fat and Hambeast are duplicates

Just pointing this out here since they're gigantic articles and I don't want to trigger a rapebot or something. SuicideTwins 02:21, 16 October 2011 (CEST)

Fixed. 02:31, 16 October 2011 (CEST)

Talk:Hambeast – Someone undid the change. --JuniusThaddeus 15:12, 20 October 2011 (CEST)

Unblocking h64

h64 was banned a few months back for ops abuse and I feel that we should reconsider allowing him to edit again. I'm not saying we should just give privs back, but he is a valued member of the community and would probably continue to contribute despite his admin being removed.

What does the staff think? 01:41, 17 October 2011 (CEST)

I would love to have h64 back. Have you asked h64 about whether he would like to come back? --JuniusThaddeus 16:24, 18 October 2011 (CEST)

I won't ask him till this is cleared with the staff. 18:31, 18 October 2011 (CEST)

No.--zaiger (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2011 (CEST)

Why? --JuniusThaddeus 20:30, 18 October 2011 (CEST)

im glad he is back. in whatever capacity. -hipcrime 04:03, 30 October 2011 (CET)

BYOND

Two users have recommended the article be deleted due to it being a shitty heap of attacks and butthurt. I believe that deletion is not necessary, but rather we find someone willing to have it moved to their userspace to work on. What does everyone else think? 00:44, 18 October 2011 (CEST)

As it stands it is a pretty shitty attack artice. The whole thing needs to be revamped. Dys 04:44, 21 October 2011 (CEST)

OWS: Army Vet challenges the cops

- Vinland 03:01, 19 October 2011 (CEST)

And now, horses

- Vinland 14:06, 19 October 2011 (CEST)

 [23:24] <@OldDirtyBtard> we used to have  ajoke

 [23:24] <@OldDirtyBtard> what kind of animal has a cunt halway up its back?

 [23:24] <@OldDirtyBtard> a police horse

Anyone else think he'd facepalm if he knew all the shit that would go down right after he checked out? RIP ODB

Nostalgia 05:24, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

Sophie Lancaster's mother and ED

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/northwest/9307857.Vile_website_mocks_murder_of_Sophie_Lancaster/ --JuniusThaddeus 04:25, 20 October 2011 (CEST)

This is why the article was featured, on a side note, Rusty is mad. 04:26, 20 October 2011 (CEST)

Parly says...

This particular page was written with the sole intention of causing offence and distress. That’s not satire.

sat·ire /ˈsætaɪər/ Show Spelled[sat-ahyuhr] (noun)

1.the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.

Teh Dickshunary; USE IT FFS! ~ Mr Jonzz 15:11, 22 October 2011 (CEST)

http://menmedia.co.uk/rossendalefreepress/news/s/1462515_mum-of-sophie-lancaster-demands-ban-of-sick-hate-website – Here's another article. --JuniusThaddeus 16:13, 25 October 2011 (CEST)

I lol'd at Rusty Groves' comments. --zaiger (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2011 (CEST)

QOTN Suggestion

	“	For the last time, there's not such thing as the Internet!	„
	—Some Furry on MAD

Previous Quote | Next Quote

Sl0nderman [- http://ab7.webs.com] 02:15, 21 October 2011 (CEST)

Trolling the streets

At the very end, notice he's just trolling the protestors as much as he's trolling the 'bamazombies. - Vinland 02:48, 21 October 2011 (CEST)

UPDATE:

He's on fire! - Vinland 14:27, 1 November 2011 (CET)

Soldiers troll Billo

	“	The motivation behind the order to burn them was not political...as mentioned in the original post, we are in an extraordinarily remote location. We don't have a post office here, so sending them back wasn't an option. Extra space is scarce and alternatives that a few mentioned, like recycling, are nonexistent...I'm aware of the historical implications of book-burning. I won't say I didn't take pleasure in removing a few copies of this bigoted twerp's writings from circulation, but the reason for doing so was military necessity.	„
	—Epic trolls in uniform

You can't beat this shit. You just can't. - Vinland 23:25, 22 October 2011 (CEST)

An article in dire need of halp

This article is shit. However, it is highly salvageable. Get to work fgts! What could it be?

The removal of a valuable content of a certain article

So it's about the article White Nationalism and its section — Racemixing.

So, one of the admins went batshit insane and removed a good slice of a content there. Before this, it had been already adressed here, at my talkpage (read it first). Now, it's the admin's conscious decision, and I understand that you might be prone to take his words more reliably, but lemme finish here. A few additional kilobytes because of these images, which are hidden and won't be seen unless is uncollapsed by a reader - I don't think it worth deleting a valuable amount of content of a section which goes way back to an old ED (peace be upon it) and which served as one of section's primary eye-attraction / candy. It surely generates butthurt among white knights, and not just them. There might be a compromiss on adding all other provocative real-life examples into a sub-section (they're stored on ED's hard drives anyway), but then again isn't it more convenient to have them in one article and be able / have an access to see them all rather than opening another link?

Well, this whole case is not a big deal, but it's a much lesser deal to keep the content rather than removing recklessly the fine amount of it right after the fifth row.

Also, can someone check what happened to this first file in an uncollapsed scope? on google's cache as you can see, it existed. Hm... just a random thought has popped up in my mind, what if that second brownie next to that white girl - is Meepsheep? That would explain his sensitivity to these kind of images and his need to find a cheap excuse to limit the exposure of these images to the public. :) Cirnofag 01:44, 28 October 2011 (CEST)

p.s. I checked the cached image of the mysteriously disappeared original image, and now the cached one is gone too. Maybe it's just a coincidence. Fuck, I could only retrieve a small icon of it from my browser. Cirnofag 08:20, 28 October 2011 (CEST)

File:Int1276464095003.jpg – I've restored the image so you can view it. It's a tiny image. Is it even worth keeping? It doesn't even show much. Truth be told, these images aren't offensive or provocative. Some even qualify as moderate flapping material. I think most viewers would be entertained, aroused, or at least amused, but they wouldn't be offended. I don't see the value of these images. The cartoons and those immigration images work well on the article, but the others don't add much. For the sake of transparency, I'm a product of several interracial couplings. You have the right to assume that I'm biased, but I believe that my assessment reflects what most unbiased individuals would conclude. --JuniusThaddeus 16:37, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

also Category:Race Mixing was removed as well. I propose to remove all the uploaded pics in that category as well. "There's no point" of them anyway. What seems to be not a big deal is facing such a resistance and reluctancy from certain admins for it to be kept in the article. And obviously you're not conceiving a hatred against me just for the sole reason that I'm a symbol of these pictures being uploaded in that article or that I'm questioning the reason behind their removal. It's not like you're more comfortable if these pictures are taken down rather than be remained in the gallery, because who knows, it might offend someone! Who happens to stumble upon them and recognize himself in one of the uploaded pictures. And the fact that this case makes your face serious, means these pictures does something to you, like induces certain ... feelings in you. Which means I succeeded. Cirnofag 01:16, 30 October 2011 (CEST)

Seriously, you did nothing but keep uploading stupid images and add them to that article, after being instructed not to do so. Nobody cares, get over it. 01:22, 30 October 2011 (CEST)

That's the best part of the article, although I imagine that after a certain point we've enough images. Don't baleet the whole section, though. Just leave some comment tags saying we've enough-- -brxbrx 02:00, 30 October 2011 (CEST)

Which is exactly what I did, along with asking him to remove some of the 150ish images that were on there, but rather he chose to add more. 02:04, 30 October 2011 (CEST)

Observation

Since the revival I've notice ED seems to be taking a conservatard tone in some of the big name articles, maybe I'm reading into it too much, but is trying to get lulz from hipster libtards? Stlson 19:56, 29 October 2011 (CEST)

Really, it all depends on the writers. 01:22, 30 October 2011 (CEST)

What should we do with EncyclopaedDramatica?

suggestions go here 02:34, 30 October 2011 (CEST)

What the hell is EncyclopedoDramatica this faggotry? (lol taekesi) ◔ᴗ◔ 15:24, 31 October 2011 (CET)
We can post the the year in lulz thingie if PieAreSquare will still make it. --zaiger (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2011 (CET)

Epic template is epic

See here

Esther❥Nguyen 05:32, 31 October 2011 (CET)

Excellent template! Looks like a lot of effort went into it as well. Maybe we could take it a step further, and update quite a few of our templates? Just a small suggestion. - Another n00b 09:03, 31 October 2011 (CET)

Awesome Template

04:16, 1 November 2011 (CET)

Huge fuck up

Just look at h64's contributions. I fixed a couple thousand instances by hand so far but my eyes are starting to hurt so if someone could help I would appreciate it. No scripts please. --zaiger (talk) 11:02, 31 October 2011 (CET)

What the fuck broke the last few days to cause this?! - Vinland 23:05, 31 October 2011 (CET)

I think we are done reverting and rollbacking. Nothing of value was lost.

04:12, 1 November 2011 (CET)

Lol this whole situation reminds me of the story of this guy. --One With The Lulz 06:07, 1 November 2011 (CET)

It really is no ones fault, just a bot botch up. Its a risk you take every time a bot is used.

00:56, 2 November 2011 (CET)

Shit like this happens every time h64 touches the wiki. --zaiger (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2011 (CET)

It's still far from fixed, a lot of pages link to templates that he replaced categories with (especially {{Psychology}} and {{ljdrama}}). If anyone else has the time, please check what links to those templates and remove them from the pages they don't belong in. 00:21, 6 November 2011 (CET)