User talk:Brxbrx

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RE: Wow. It's like the whole gang is here.

I'm still subscribed to the mailing list, so I saw what happened. China is .cn; .ch is Switzerland. Not everyone is here, but it's enough for the time being. Nice to see you so happy. --JuniusThaddeus 16:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

No, it's ptime. You can tell from the Email address. --JuniusThaddeus 17:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back

I also remember you, despite not speaking that much about it. Good to see old faces again. - Vinland 17:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


RE:About the Hinako articles

Yeah i see your point, i was considering merging the two, as i cant delete the Sleeping article, what would you advise? merging or what? in my defense i at least see some relevance in keeping at least one article on the series. Would like to hear back as i want to keep from posting shitty articles as much as possible.I'm moving it for the time being (I merged it all here)--Shika 11:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back

Im just glad you didn't stick to using OhShiternet.

PræsidentMudkip 14:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

and I'm glad your signature is down to a reasonable size :D--Brxbrx 19:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh, the irony of that statement... Behold:--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talkcontribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 02:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

RE: Your thoughts

The Kazantzakis Guide to Article Building. --JuniusThaddeus 19:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

so you'll be mute on the subject of OI? I checked out your talk page, you don't seem to express a clear opinion--Brxbrx 19:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought you said "dig up". Keep the Kazantzakis Guide as is for historical purposes. You may create a totally new guide if you wish, but it'll have to be on a different page. --JuniusThaddeus 19:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: I'm curious

Sorry, I didn't see that question. At the moment, OhI is serving as a home to the old ED's Nomenklatura / Intelligentsia. They believe that they're a step above the userbase. I was never a fan of the site's Web 2.0 design. For me, Web 2.0 (social networking) represents the worst of the Internet, since Web 2.0 enables attention-seekers. The web should be about sharing and discussing (ie. Usenet, bulletin boards), not blogging about one's your life in LiveJournal. I didn't have a say in OhI's layout or design; I was only there to provide article content.

I'm having trouble trying to list OhI's saving graces, which is disturbing since I should be able to defend the website I helped built. Chiefly, I saw an opportunity to be creative, entertaining, and informative without being over-the-top offensive or stupid. A lot of ED articles try too hard to funny by being too long or inserting junk, and I wanted articles to be shorter and more concise. I lost enthusiasm quickly, and I only wrote five articles (which became worse and worse as I moved along). --JuniusThaddeus 00:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Disillusioned isn't a strong enough word. I gradually became the butt end of their mockery. I'm not sure what to do with that experience. Do you have any suggestions? --JuniusThaddeus 01:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Michaeldsuarez was my original ED username, but I decided to change it. You weren't there at the time. The Semantic MediaWiki stuff was Sherrod's idea, and it has been a part of OhInternet since Day 1. Semantic Forms are too difficult for new users to use, don't give enough leeway for deviations, and it relies on too many scripts. Wikipoints = Web 2.0, and I've made my thoughts on that clear. My only involvement was writing articles and keeping my mouth shut. What's the "saranwrap" template? --JuniusThaddeus 02:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not sure how to restore that template. Go ahead. If conciseness or brevity isn't your style, then feel free not to use them. What's going on at RationalWiki? --JuniusThaddeus 02:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
As with the TV Tropes article, I only started the RationalWiki article since it was wrong to not have an article on the subject. It has expanded and was rewritten since then. You should definitely add it to the article. --JuniusThaddeus 10:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Repairing the Main Page

HEY THERE!
Hey, Brxbrx! I saw what you did with repairing the Main Page.
I just wanted to say keep up the good work.

-YellowZombieHater 13:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

rice dude

he was obv from the community and was here to promote his other online presences. also my account wasnt hacked i did that all the time on purpose. i dont remember sorry. H64 14:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Sup











SIGN UR COMMENTS, KPLZTHX

You know I still love you though <3--Shika 01:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

you do realize I use the unsigned template as my sig, right?--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talkcontribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 01:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Oh boy this is an unexpected twist--Shika 02:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I should get a new one, though. It adds 500 characters to my talk page edits. IDK why, on RationalWiki templates don't add text they simply transclude it. I'll figure it out.--— The preceding comment was added by brxbrx (talkcontribs) who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. 02:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I'd say a nice 30px icon and your name would be much neater, let me know if there's anything I can do to help--Shika 02:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Conservapedia

Excellent, but next time and before you revert something check it out because you reverted many good edits. Glenda Jackson 22:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

testing

let's see--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 06:14, 27 July 2011 (CEST)

RE: email

I've been having similar problems. I was able to determine your Email address, so I sent you an Email instead. I hope you don't mind. Thank you for changing your signature. This one is much better. --JuniusThaddeus 16:25, 27 July 2011 (CEST)

I received your Email, and I've sent my reply. --JuniusThaddeus 23:32, 27 July 2011 (CEST)
You're welcome. --JuniusThaddeus 01:23, 28 July 2011 (CEST)

TJC

I accidentally reverted you, my bad :( 01:56, 19 September 2011 (CEST)

Some html halp

Try replacing "fixed" with "absolute". --JuniusThaddeus 17:05, 1 October 2011 (CEST)

Are you forgetting to add "px" to the end of the number? --JuniusThaddeus 14:47, 2 October 2011 (CEST)
I gave you something to start with. I'm not sure where exactly you want the image. --JuniusThaddeus 15:09, 2 October 2011 (CEST)
You're welcome. --JuniusThaddeus 00:30, 3 October 2011 (CEST)


RE: Talk page?

You mean here? if not sorry, new to this site so dont quite get it yet --User:Thespartanpenguin

Rational Wiki?

Were you ever active at Rational Wiki, as BrxBrx? Thank you, Sir Tubbington IIIcontrib

Just saying Hi! — Preceding comment added by wikiphile (talkcontribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE! Nevermind.Wikiphile 19:58, 1 December 2011 (CET)

Just curious What Did You Edit on The MeganSpeak`s Article?

Also, more importantly, how did you find that article in the first place?

Anyways nice chatting with you and have a nice day :-)

--MegaManSwordMan 04:20, 30 December 2011 (CET) ¸

How Does MeganSpeaks Resemble Fat Girl Angel Shots?

--MegaManSwordMan 05:26, 31 December 2011 (CET)

I see you're up to no goat...

Trolling again?Wikiphile 12:35, 16 February 2012 (EST)

Avoiding flames? That's an interesting approach for an EDiotWikiphile 18:44, 16 February 2012 (EST)