Talk:Kevin & Kell

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>T at 18:15, 8 June 2013. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to navigationJump to search

2010

This is a screen cap of the original talk page, as of April 16th, 2010

Image:Talk_Page_-_Kevin_&_Kell.png

Full text

Well, here's one better. The full text of the original talk page Dungad 02:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

First

As bad as Kevin and Kell is, there is one major newspaper that publishes it (he is able to get his other comics to be published in hundreds of newspapers, but this one just one? Lulz.), but they were going to shitcan his comic as it was unpopular with readers as shown here: http://www.ajc.com/services/content/printedition/2009/01/12/comicspoll.html They were going to take off a few other comics as well, but they decided to put it up to a vote online, and Holbrook literally told his fan-basis a way to cheat on the poll to make it seem like his comic strip was very popular. He even gloated about it a few days afterwards. Lulz, what a pathetic cartoonist. (ATadBitLulzy 08:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC))

For those who can bear to read it without vomiting, TOW has an article on Kevin and Kell that accurately depicts it as one of the most insipid things ever conceived by man. Robérto 16:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Added a new section that is obviously on everyones minds. At least I hope. —The preceding comment was added by TheHolbrookKing, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. The usefulness of this article has way outpast itself

What's the point of this article and it's useless insults and name calling? What's the point? It seems to get no views and it's not "trolling" or flaming anyone, so why keep it up? Just a thought. This article is kept up because most of the people who run this site are incredibly petty. —The preceding comment was added by TheHolbrookKing, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

      1. You've viewed and been trolled by it, so in that capacity, it's demonstrably relevant.
      2. Instead of being such an inept crybaby, you might want to learn how to write properly so that you can properly implement possessive pronouns and contractions, and avoid typing embarrassing shit like, "The usefulness of this article has way outpast itself."
      3. Learn where to post your whines, you petty, idiotic noob. 

--Robérto 17:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Enough is enough. —The preceding comment was added by StopThisNow, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

       * Awww, u mad? Words on a screen all went and made you a pissy little angry snit? Tsch, tsch, tsch...dats too bad, huh? If you'd like, you can get all pissy and indignant about it and throw yourself a little online temper tantrum! I bet *THAT* will sure help you out! Oh uh, in yer next reply, could you flail yer arms about and stomp up and down, cause that'd *REALLY* make your stupidity just that much more amusing for all of us. ^__^ --Itchy Balls 18:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 

End the childish crap. Okay? This is what this article should say, if it remains in existence: File:Kk20100406.gif Kevin and Kell.

Kevin and Kell is a furry comedy webcomic strip by syndicated cartoonist Bill Holbrook. The strip began on September 3, 1995.[1] It is one of the oldest continuously running webcomics.

The strip centers on the mixed marriage between a rabbit, Kevin and a grey wolf, Kell Dewclaw. In their society, their major difference is their diet: Kevin is a herbivore and Kell is a carnivore. Their family includes three children: Lindesfarne, a hedgehog adopted from Kevin's first marriage; Rudy, a wolf/fox hybrid born during Kell's first marriage; and Coney, a carnivorous rabbit.[2] The comics plot revolves around species-related humor, satire, and interpersonal conflict.

Kevin and Kell receives over three million pages views per month and is published in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.[3][4] Holbrook has won honors from the Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards and the Ursa Major Awards for the strip.[5][6] Background

Kevin and Kell takes place in a town known as Domain, populated entirely by animals. The comic describes the world they live in as created by an organization called birds, commonly referred to by fans of the strip as the "Great Bird Conspiracy" (GBC). Birds were the next species after humans to reach sapience. After humans left the planet, the birds traveled back in time to create a world without humans, and gave intelligence to fauna. However, their plan fails to remove predator-prey relationships. As a result, the world created is similar to that of twentieth century Earth, but with a greater likelihood of a violent death.[7]

The society in Kevin and Kell rather than identifying people by race or social class identifies by scent and having class distinctions such as "carnivores", "herbivores", "insectivores", and "nocturnal".[8] There is also a "Wild" where civilized animals can leave civilization and act like normal animals, walking on all fours and not wearing clothing.[9] Predation is central to strips and jokes are made about it being commonplace.[10]

Humans exist in an alternate Domain, and are referred to as creatures with no natural defenses. Most believe that they are fictional creatures; but a few, including the Dewclaws, know that they exist. This is developed further in 2003 by the introduction of the character Danielle, a human who enters the animal world via the Bermuda Triangle.[11][12] The series features jokes on a variety of topics. Many draw satirical parallels between its world and ours, making fun of sport, society, class-snobbery, school, technology and offices. Some storylines are satirical. For example, in January 2008 the Predator's Union was described as going on strike, a parody of the 2007–08 Writers Guild of America strike.[13] " TheBunnyisHere 17:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

   * File:Emot-words.gif 

.

»»What 17:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

There are lies and slander on this article. For example, the comic wasn't started in 1993, it was started in 1995 and no, it was never a failure. Bill Holbrook has never studied animal sexuality and also, remove those graphic drawings of the Kevin and Kell characters. They borderline on gory pornography. BunnyIsHereNow 18:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Images of giant penises and penises impaling are offensive and horrifying. Remove them. BunnyIsHereNow 18:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

   * Welcome to Encyclopedia Dramatica. If you don't want giant dicks everywhere, DeviantART is that way.
     KILL IT BEFORE IT USES ATTRACT. PageChatContribs 18:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 

But lies and pornographic imagery done in this manner is not legal. It seriously smears the creators of this comic strip and it probably breaks a few laws. Remove the gory and pornographic imagery please. JohnLennonBunny 18:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

   * Stop pretending you're not the creator of this shit himself. You're not fooling anyone. And your obsession with making socks is not helping your case. -- Image:Awesome-slide.gif DerSquirrel Image:Awesome-slide.gif 20:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 
       *
             o And how dare you bring John Lennon's name into this. He would surely not approve of your faggotry. Widdershins 08:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 

We never said we were the creator. Also, calling someone a pedophile without proof is illegal GeorgiaStorm 20:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

   * Where does it say anything about being a pedo in the article? Or is just something we haven't learned about you yet? -- Image:Awesome-slide.gif DerSquirrel Image:Awesome-slide.gif 20:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 

We? Nothing about we, but you call Bill Holbrook a pedophile clearly in one of your nasty images. Remove all those images. NoSlanderHere 20:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

       * Child, you really don't understand how the world works at all, do you? Calling someone names is not "illegal" in any way, at least not in any civilized country. At ~most~ you could try and say it's slander and at ~most~ you could try and sue someone for it...however slander is probably one of, if not *THE* hardest case to prove in court and even if you did magically win, well, the only blood you can squeeze out of a rock is your own. And if you lose, and they counter-sued, which is very likely, oh hey, guess what? Yeah, you get to PAY THEM a whole shit load of money (presuming you even have any).
         Unfortunately for your idiocy this entire site is built upon the principles of PARODY and SATIRE which are *VERY* well protected forms of freedom of speech, thanks in large part to the work of the great Larry Flint. Now, you're very likely quite the hypocritical fucktard because I'd be willing to bet your dumbass has watched more than a few episodes of Saturday Night Live, MadTV, Jay Leno, Conan O'Brian and all those other comedy shows and probably laughed yer damn ass off at nearly every other joke that poked fun at celebrities, the presidents, hell sometimes even themselves. Yer so gawd damn Jesus raping stupid though that your stupid ass thinks it's perfectly fun and entertaining...until it's happening to you. Then suddenly you start BAAAWing like a babyfur and crying for mommy moderator to come and coddle you like an angry toddler in a therapy session.
         Lemme give you some advice kiddo...this page, not goin anywhere. And the more you struggle like you are now...the worse you're going to make it. And in effect, people like you often use ED articles as a means of effectively SELF-SLANDERING, meaning that if you just ignore the shit, laugh along with it, realize it's just for fun...then most people are going to think yer an okay guy. But instead, if you struggle like a little bitch, scream and tantrum about it and generally make an all around fucktard out of yourself...oh hey, people are going to see HOW YOU REACTED to the article...and *THAT* could be *VERY* damaging to your little imagined reputation...not that you really have much of one to begin with.
         To put it to you as simply as possible, Cuppycake...I once enraged a guy online *SO* badly that he actually hacked into the Nambla website and deface the front end of it with pictures of me for like a *WEEK* straight...and I THOUGHT IT WAS FUNNY! *shrugs* You srsly need a little perspective check here, Sparkles. Here, watch this:
         I, Matthew Moulton, do hereby openly admit to being a donkey raping shit eater!
         *shrugs*
         It's just words on a screen, Cuppycake. Words have no more power than what *YOU* choose to give them. And it's the fuckin Internet, fer Keerist sakes. No one, except for the stupidest fuckin retards around actually take shit on the gawd damn grid even the ~least~ bit seriously, especially the fuck not on Encyclopedia Dramatica. In fact, if anything, ED is great way to troll the little goobers who might try and use your article to "attack" you...since if they do, you can simply start posting links to the article about niggers and start screaming, "OH HEY U SUPPORT KILLING NIGGERS LOL!" After all, if ~your~ article is supposed to be entirely true and factual...well, that would make *EVERY* article on ED entirely true and factual...think about it, Dipshit. --Itchy Balls 21:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 


       And attempting to remove Itchy Balls' message just proves how right he is. There are only two kinds of people who want this page down: the person behind Kevin & Kell and the other people the guy who made Kevin & Kell pretends to be. And you'll need more than that to get rid of the page. But do please continue registering accounts and failing to understand what a wiki is. It just makes the page better. -- Image:Awesome-slide.gif DerSquirrel Image:Awesome-slide.gif 22:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 

How would you like to be called a pedophile? No one does. Remove these nasty gory images. Weareoutsiderz 23:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

   Fuck yourself, Holbrook. I'd advise the virgin diaper boy to follow suit, but that's his M.O. --Robérto 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) 

We are not Holbrook! Remove the pedophile and gory images or else! Noturningbackn 01:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

       * Or else what? You'll get all snitty and pissy and wet yer pretty pink princess training panties in indignant frustration? LOL Shutzpah 01:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC) 

Look all around you. Aroyaldeck 22:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

   * We want all images removed! Especially that penis one but especially that gory one with the many penises! Thereisnotbelt 02:25, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
         o Why do you do this? Thereisnotbelt 02:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
               + You people are sadist. Why are you showing us those images? Thereisnotbelt 02:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 

We just gave you a taste of your own medicine. how did you like it? we can keep it up forever —The preceding comment was added by Nogoryimag, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

   * Your antics are tempting me to draw some 34 of Kell. lol.
     KILL IT BEFORE IT USES ATTRACT. PageChatContribs 20:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
   * What did they do that was our own medicine -- Image:Awesome-slide.gif DerSquirrel Image:Awesome-slide.gif 21:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 

An open letter to Holbrook

Okay. I'm certainly not the first to address your faggotry. Clearly others have tried and failed to shut you the fuck up. So, i'm going to go ahead, throw in my two cents, and tell you just how much I fucking hate you.

Now, normally i'm a rational, upstanding guy in society. I work, I pay bills, and beat the occasional hooker. I love drugs, I don't really drink, and I go to college.As most people know, college is a bitch on the wallet, and as such i'm not exactly floating here.

Then, there's you. You, a guy with a chip on his shoulder so big i'm surprised your so called 'comics' haven't collapsed under the weight of your hubris. Your rampant sockpuppetry, you blatant disregard for the rules of a wiki, and the fact that you stole Bram Stoker's version of a Dracula haircut makes me feel that you exist solely for the purpose of propagating The Furred Menace.

This makes me angry.

But you see, anyone can get angry. Anger is just a normal part of life. You feel it everyday.the guy that cuts you off at an intersection? Fuck that guy. That punk ass fuck who spits on your burger? Yeah, angry. But it takes a special kind of person to earn my hatred. Above and beyond all else, I despise pretentiousness. I despise assholes who think everyone is out to get them, and will do anything, ANYTHING to save face. They're so convinced of themselves that they believe that they are just misunderstood, that if people would just open their minds up, you'd be exalted as a man among men.

Fat chance, cocksucker.

I hate you because you're pretentious. A big ball of BAWWWWWWW who believes that his comic is worth a shit simply because it's been around longer. You know what else has been around since 1993? Marvel, DC, Dark Horse, etc. You know. Good comics. With plot. With prose. I hate you because your furfaggotry had led you to believe that a piss poor panel comic is somehow as good as Marvel, when in fact your bullshit is as appealing as AIDs. And holy shit, I like how you think you have lots of fans who would slavishly bend to your every puppy fucking whim. Guess what? ED is bigger than you, and always will be.

Let's not EVEN begin to mention that you use your comic to attack the internet. Thanks Chris-Chan, but I do believe i'll be skipping your so called 'Haet ED personal army' bullshit.

Furfags are the scum of the earth, and must be put to the torch. So sayeth the God Emperor of Mankind. He will never give you up. The God Emperor will never let you down. He would never turn around, and desert you.

I hope you read this. I really do. I want you to see and feel my palpable hatred. I want my hatred to ooze upon you like sebum dripping from a fat athlete's groin upon your head. I hope you take my hatred, and use it to try and fix yourself. Because I certainly will not help you, and no one here at ED will either.

Better yet, fucking kill yourself. Filthy little ass fuck. I want you to die. At least then you would've done something funny.

VaultTec2 15:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Holbrook must feel threatened...not! you're a fucking loser and we're defeating you now. —The preceding comment was added by ZombieSharkz, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

   Yep. Choo-choo of Contemplation (Where's your ticket?) 20:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 
   lol furries ^_^ --zaigertalkplx 21:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 

Trolls Template

Seeing as how this page is protected, could a sysop add

 

Kevin & Kell is part of a series on

Trolls

Visit the Trolls Portal for complete coverage.

next to the rest of the templates at the bottom of the page? Thx. Image:Littlemudkip.gif  r3x    talk    contribs  Image:Littlemudkip.gif 16:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Kenan & Kel

Thats what I thought when I found this article, nice job whoever put that pic up here. BHM1250 00:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Another open letter to holbrook

lol, internet. -- Image:Awesome-slide.gif DerSquirrel Image:Awesome-slide.gif 01:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

you guys fail worse than john mccain! anyway, this page isn't staying up for long, especially since that call for more pictures. thanks for giving holbook and his team legal precedent!—The preceding comment was added by Flammingdoritom, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

   To do what, challenge fair use in court? --Robérto 01:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 
   * >giving holbook and his team
     NICE TYPO FAGGOT.
     KILL IT BEFORE IT USES ATTRACT. PageChatContribs 01:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
         o very mature. thank god for the dmca. this page and those images are going down. —The preceding comment was added by TacofoolsED, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
               + Funny how you say that I'm being immature, and yet your persistent vandalism is not? Talk about double standards.
                 KILL IT BEFORE IT USES ATTRACT. PageChatContribs 03:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

some ED idiot tried to claim the dmca would be false but then he removed the comment! okay guys, remove the page or probably face a lawsuit in the future ;) —The preceding comment was added by Sexxsers, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

   * I lol'd as well to be honest.
     KILL IT BEFORE IT USES ATTRACT. PageChatContribs 03:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 

To all of the vandal faggots DIE SCUM

Thanks.

Thayo {talk - contribs}♥ 23:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC) So I heard you liked K&K porn. Image:Lt-grey.png Image:Rt-grey.png

File:Kevin and kell kell 34.png

THIS PAGE IS BEING WATCHED BY ENEMIES OF THE LULZ THEY GOT TIRED OF PLAYING SOLO

Image:Lb-grey.png Image:Rb-grey.png

KILL IT BEFORE IT USES ATTRACT. PageChatContribs 03:49, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Lest we forget ...

Possibly for the first time in ED history, the furries came - willingly - to the trolls. In case anyone has forgotten, Holbrook and his his friends began vandalising the article on furries all the way back in March 2009. We responded to this shit-flinging with a fan. Billy brought this on himself.

--MudkipsPlz •Is watching you masturbate• 23:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

And many lols were had at the furries' expense, which tends to happen anyway. Shrubkike was here 00:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Kevin and Kell on TV

2011

TV

Oh dear, old billy has actually found a producer stupid enough to get his crap on tv. http://write2wow.web.officelive.com/NEWSLETTER.aspx Igottatakeadump12 04:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Kevin and Kell R34

Someone /r/-ed? Watari montana 22:05, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

2013

Missing 34

There is a serious lack of K&K 34 and I am wondering if we could work on restoring some things missing from the article. Girlvinyl/Sherrod could be a help here if she would think of THE GREATER GOOD. It's not as if she'd be hosting this on her new wiki anyway. We are lacking:

Far as I can tell probably only the first one is 34, possibly 2nd.   14:15, 8 June 2013 (EDT)