Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

Talk:PrincessElizabeth013: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
imported>Jazzybellio4912
imported>Jazzybellio4912
(No difference)

Revision as of 23:00, 1 June 2015

It's a work in fucking progress. Wanna help contribute? By all means. LoveTheLulz 8:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

You seriously wrote an article about a 13 year old pretending to be a 14 year old and acting exactly like you would expect a 13 year old pretending to be a 14 year old to act on the Internet... fascinating! Tell us more! I await with baited breath on this one! So exciting! :D
--U Mad Bro 22:46, 2 January 2015 (EST)


I will tell you more. I need to find the really juicy parts first though. The girl milks herself it's just a matter of finding it through all of the rants, journals and caps people have made about her. LoveTheLulz 8:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

I think you should probably stop stalking children on the Internet. Seriously.
--U Mad Bro 23:09, 2 January 2015 (EST)

I doubt age is a thing on here. LoveTheLulz 8:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

A fat 14-year-old Sonicfag who single-handedly racked up hoards of negative comments OTI, and even merited a butthurt petition to ban her from DA and FA on account of her open hatred of homosexuals. That's hilarious! I wonder if she e-dates like Fluffy teh wolf?   
23:11, 2 January 2015 (EST)

She probably does. She was doing sexual role plays with sadikthehedgehog458 for a while. LoveTheLulz 8:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

You were reading "sexual role plays" involving an actual 13 year old girl... ooooooooooooooookay then. I'm out! --U Mad Bro 23:27, 2 January 2015 (EST)

If you're really thinking that shit was actually private you're not very bright. Shit was public for anyone passing by to read. Lots of people know about that pedo shit. LoveTheLulz 9:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC

From sifting through her DA profile comments, it appears she was banned before and then got her account back. Reports have been filed against her but nothing is done, perhaps because she paid for premium. There's definitely potential here. Krookodilian 00:54, 5 January 2015 (EST)

It appears her main account and her first alt have deactivated. So far her second alt account hasn't done anything other than favorite art. I think she got scared off. --User:Ricki 4:20 PST 9 January 2015

Anti-ED petition, seriously?

You have got to be shitting me. That will be even LESS effective at getting rid of ED than trying to blank the fucking page. DarkLordTR --> Talk here, n00bs. 18:38, 3 January 2015 (EST)

And yet it still remains as one of the most popular forms of ED hate. There's practically a new one every other week on average...
http://fuckyeahfeminists.com/post/14024528525/petition-for-encyclopedia-dramatica-to-take-down
Most of them don't get very many signatures though:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/108/085/627/delete-encyclopedia-dramatica/
I'd say 25 to 50 is probably "average"...
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ban-encyclopedia-dramatica/
The Rape article seems to generate the most attention:
https://www.change.org/p/petition-for-encyclopedia-dramatica-to-take-down-rape-page
I think a lot of the "general" ones like this:
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/closedownED/
Are started by people who have articles who want to try and avoid looking personally butt hurt.
Slightly smarter than the ones who openly point out their own article.
--U Mad Bro 01:17, 5 January 2015 (EST)

Not at all. LoveTheLulz 6:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

You can tell it's a win when they make a petition, good job Tigercommander 01:38, 5 January 2015 (EST)

if theyre really 13...

then this article should not exist. we have deleted articles about 13/14yrs olds before, i see no reason this one should not be deleted as well. in ddition, ED documents drama, and there is barely any drama in this article other then screencaps in a gallery. most people are not going to look at each of those. there is also no need to have a 13yo girls IRL Name or location on here for the world to see.--Talk to me|Contribs 01:39, 5 January 2015 (EST)

She isn't 13 but 14 and the screencaps are what document the drama and that's you're opinion. Oh look here! Articles on 13 year olds. Another article on a kid and this one was 11 when ED came across her. The shit I'm reading is funny though. LoveTheLulz 1:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm rather concerned about the supposed sexual content that the guy who wrote the article just stumbled across by "accident" or whatever... that's just... no. Pretty sure if you get nailed for being a pedophile you can't just claim that you stumbled over the 12/13 year old erotica fanfic by "accident". That's normally the point any sensible adult would have immediately reported said content and then ran the fuck away from it and the girl as fast as possible.
I get the impression though, based on other content the author of the article has put up, that they're a disgruntled Sonic fan-fag of some sort and probably under-age themselves. Basically one tween trying to attack another tween in the same community. Or, potentially even worse, they're an adult who takes the fandom seriously and as such goes around attacking the kids in the community who are just acting like kids act.
Usually with cases like this you want to wait and see if they continue it after they hit 18 to 20, that's the point at which they've evolved into full blown nutter. By creating this article now she's instead likely to wizen up and any future lulz will then be ruined. That's just my take on it. --U Mad Bro 02:27, 5 January 2015 (EST)

You didn't watch that video link I see. Eh your opinion. From what I understand this girl has made two apology journals before and people found out they were fake but you would know that if you looked through the caps and the links so eh. LoveTheLulz 1:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

In what version of reality are you living in where it would even be remotely fathomable to actually, wantonly, willingly click on a link "explaining" the sexual exploits of a 12 year old? Is this just how a pedophile, child stalker thinks or are you severely brain damaged in some capacity? --U Mad Bro 06:18, 5 January 2015 (EST)

Apparently you missed the part where the youtube video wasn't removed for containing kiddy smut as you call it. I wonder why that video link is still there? Hmmm. Also, didn't you say you were done? An indication that you were leaving. Oh look here! Articles on 13 year olds. Another article on a kid and this one was 11 when ED came across her. LoveTheLulz 7:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry, those who are debating on deleting your work on the grounds of morals don't have the ability to do so. :> Vermin   13:32, 5 January 2015 (EST)

Oh I know but you know they gotta argue for the sake of arguing. LoveTheLulz 7:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Vermin also enjoys stalking and molesting young children, due to his very edgy "lack of morals" (read: pedophilia). :D
--U Mad Bro 13:37, 5 January 2015 (EST)
<video type="youtube" id="dQVp6PqT-UI&start=63" height="250" width="350" position="center" frame="false" /> Vermin   14:03, 5 January 2015 (EST)

The tone of the article comes off as hostile, as if you personally have a beef with her. Care should definitely be taken since this is a minor. If this were just another sonicfag, I'd tell you to scrap it. But there is some drama here. Definitely not something worth searching for, but it would be a good read for people who are just surfing related pages. If you want to, I'd say go for it. Krookodilian 23:51, 5 January 2015 (EST)

Not really but it's funny how everyone's butthurt over it pulling shit out their ass. If articles on minors was an actual big deal then articles on Jessi_Slaughter or Hayley_Nightmare or Rehtaeh_Parsons would've been deleted immediately with since their ages ranging from 11 to 16. LoveTheLulz 11:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Just To Be Clear

I don't actually want the article removed. I mean this Sonic fan fag is stalking a little kid and rambling on about her sexual exploits all over the talk page. If it's removed that's like removing the evidence of his crimes. Which would be pretty stupid. Part of the fun of pedophiles is that they routinely screw themselves over through their own actions that they perceive as "normal". Like that one fat nigger who couldn't ever shut up about his loli fixations. Didn't take very long for the feds to bust that guy and it probably won't take them long to bust this nutter too, so I say let him openly document his child stalking on one of the biggest sites on the face of the Internet. Bonus points if you can get him to try and "explain" his pedo shenanigans on the talk page! :D

--U Mad Bro 22:35, 5 January 2015 (EST)



So the users who made the Jessi_Slaughter article, an 11 year old, are Pedos? Did they get busted too after making that article about a minor? Strange how that article is still there along with who knows how many more and their creators aren't behind bars. I see the Rehtaeh_Parsons article is still there and she's 16. If ED had a problem with articles on shitty minors, you know an actual problem pretty sure those articles would've been deleted just as they were being written. So correct me if I'm wrong here but you're just butthurt because one of your friends has an ED of her own.

Logic dictates that it's wiser to actually do the research instead of pulling shit out of your ass because if you would've watched the video you would realize you're being a dumbfuck. After all, why would Youtube keep a video up if it had kiddy smut in it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wu9xXqoVQg LoveTheLulz 11:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Yup, yer a pedo alright! :D
You try and twist the perception of one event/circumstance in order to try and make it a universally acceptable base line to run around stalking children for your own sick fuck interests. FYI the reason Jessi Slaughter has an article and the reason she got so much attention had more to do with her DAD than anything. Sure there were quite a few pedos like yourself who tried to spooge all over the girl, but the vast majority basically made attempts to try and contact her parents... and then that's where the fun really began. Because it turned out that her dad was basically a fucking moron and a horribly neglectful sperm donor. That's why she got so much attention, that's why people made the article (or at least contributed to it as much as they did). It was more about her dad and the effects of bad parenting than it ever was about her. Of course if you're a pedophile then you lack perspective, you can't see that side, all you see is open opportunities to start stalking children, because you're a sick fuck plain and simple. --U Mad Bro 01:56, 6 January 2015 (EST)


Yup, yer a dumbfuck alright! :D

A shit ton of posts on the guys page that gave the indication he was a pedo by other users:

Another indication that these two were having sexual roleplays.
Another indication that these two were having sexual roleplays.
Another indication that these two were having sexual roleplays.

Not much of an accident as you call it since it's all right there and in so many of the rant videos about your girlfriend on Youtube. You whine about one minor and not the others to make some kind of justification for calling me a pedo when the word of mouth is right out in public that you're full of shit. According to you though everyone who even mentions your favorite word is a pedo. Again, please tell me where I linked to the actual kiddy smut because so far I've only linked to a rant video and couple of comments from people who asked, wondered or even believed it? Please point out to me at what point during that rant video does kiddy smut appear? I'd really like to know because I've watched it and there isn't none to be had. I can't imagine how many people there are online who stalk each other because having basic internet skills, using Google and browsing are what make stalking a thing. So really, stop pulling shit out of your ass to defend your shitty girlfriend.LoveTheLulz 11:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

I like how not only are you stalking this underage girl (and I mean you as in just you and no one else) you're likewise so obsessed over her you're drawing in completely random strangers in order to fill nonexistent "roles" that you've imagined for your deranged little teenage sexual molestation melodrama.
Honestly though why even try and hide it at this point? I mean you're obviously a Sonic fan fag, the majority of the content you upload to ED is directly related to that autistic fandom and almost entirely directed at completely benign prototypical DevianTartlets. I mean why this random underage girl and not the 387,000 other ones that are exactly identical in every way (except for being underage)? Because you've got a "thing" for her obviously, that's the only plausible explanation for it. And the fact that you're already directly involved with the fandom of a children's cartoon/game clearly shows you have pedophilic interests. Normal adults don't watch kiddy cartoons and hang out with children doing "role play" on Deviant Art you autistic kiddy diddler.
You can try and "explain" your sick fuck interests in children's cartoons and games all you like, right along with trying to "explain" your sole fixation on a random underage Sonic fan girl, but you really aren't fooling anyone. You're the only one who is obsessed with this girl, you're the one who created the article, you're the one babbling on about her sexual escapades that you just "stumbled across by accident", you're the one feverishly trying to defend said fixation as if it's the most important thing to you in the entire universe... you're not fooling anyone so you might as well just come clean and fess up. --U Mad Bro 03:27, 6 January 2015 (EST)


I like how you love ignoring everything I've posted that proves how people discovered the guy in question was a pedo. Stop being a buttmad faggot because your Princess has an ED. It really is funny though, thanks for the laugh. LoveTheLulz 1:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

And by "people" you mean "you" since you're the only pedophile obsessing over this random tweeny bopper. Stop being a whiner just because someone exposed the fact that you like to hang out around schools to look for kids to "play with". No one forced you to start stalking some pimple ridden retard on the Internet. The only reason you're stalking her and not one of the eleventy billion other Sonic fan-fags is because you "stumbled" across mentions of pedophilia and underage girls getting into sexual situations. Apparently that's all it took to get you hooked. The only real question is, which one of these Sonic fan-fags are you? I'm guessing the one accused of being a pedophile since you're responding almost exactly the same way as that guy, so you must be "Sadikthehedgehog458" which would make sense. You made the article to try and get back at her because she got you accused of pedophilia, amirite? --U Mad Bro 07:01, 6 January 2015 (EST)

Yup I'm the only one obsessing over her. That's great advice brah you should definitely take it. Not really sure how anything of what you've been saying makes any sense but then again I'm not familiar with dumbfuck culture and it's language but you're an expert at it so maybe you can educate me on your culture. LoveTheLulz 2:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

RE: U mad Bro

i asked if about whether the article should be deleted, and instead i got walls of text, of User:U Mad Bro calling another user a "pedo" and "kiddy diddler" over and over again, and offering little argument other than that. Walls of text do not matter as much as the fact that that user has to resort to personal attacks in an argument. How SJW-like btw. On the other hand, the creator off this article has brought up several points to defend the article. --Talk to me|Contribs 11:58, 7 January 2015 (EST)

I don't want the article deleted... I'm just interested in making the article more "complete", which means exposing the Sonic fan-fag who created it in the first place. I'm more than convinced at this point that "LoveTheLulz" is in fact "Sadikthehedgehog458" or one his friends. Basically he got accused of pedophilia because of her and so he's in turn lashing out at her with this article to try and even the odds (or one of his friends). I have plans to add in some edits here in a few days, to make the article more entertaining and less one sided. I'm sure "LoveTheLulz" won't mind if EVERY side is targeted. :D
--U Mad Bro 22:41, 7 January 2015 (EST)
Hey shit for brains, how bout checking someone's contributions before assuming they're a random deviant art user. ED is all about being one-sided, if we covered everything evenly then we'd just be wikipedia. If this Saidikthehedgehog458 person is locked in a flame war with the subject of this article, and they've got enough drama surrounding them to be documented, then why not stop acting like a faggot and make an article about them as well? Talk | Contribs 01:29, 8 January 2015 (EST)
Uh, I did check their edits, have you? It should be pretty simple to find out who they actually are. I just have to search for the common denominator between all these Sonic fan-fags he keeps making revenge articles about. Shouldn't be very hard. Also, ED isn't about sides, it's about DRAMA and when it comes to autistic run communities like the Sonic fandom the drama is always on every side. PS - I needed a sample. --U Mad Bro 01:48, 8 January 2015 (EST)

ZOMG ANOTHER WALL OF TEXT Tigercommander 02:22, 8 January 2015 (EST)

Text walls are important when it comes to confirmation bias. --U Mad Bro 02:56, 8 January 2015 (EST)
z.--Talk to me|Contribs 09:10, 8 January 2015 (EST)

Erin has a shit ton of accounts on websites I haven't even heard of.

Aha I'm such a noob on this website. So I Googled "Erin Anthony Indiana Crothersville" and I found this shit on there, also all of her actual accounts got banned, but INotHater is someone else, and there's some troll accounts that may or may not be Erin, so watch out for those.  — Preceding comment added by AnonErinHater (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!


Page locked

There should be a section for this, because obviously it's her doing the vandalizing. Also, the 'ImNotHater' account on DA which left the "bigger person" response on her blog is also obviously her. Jazzybellio4912

Actually, screencaps of the convo on the talk page and a commentary seems like the next bit of padding for this article? Jazzybellio4912

Retrieved from "http://edramatica.com/index.php?title=Talk:PrincessElizabeth013&oldid=476710"