User talk:Some dude

Welcome, Some dude

This is serious. READ IT.

Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.

We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:

• Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
• To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
• Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
• These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
• The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
• Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
• Feeling social? Enjoy forums? Join here.
• See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.

---

Meepsheep

21:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi

When an article is removed, there is no reason to bring it back. 05:05, 28 July 2011 (CEST)

There's plenty of reason to bring it back. Have you forgotten why we're here, or are you all just afraid of Sherrod now? That's not like the ED I knew. Some dude 21:03, 28 July 2011 (CEST)

The problem was the kids who thought it would be funny to post her SSN and get us all in trouble. She filed false DMCA's to the point that we were dropped from our host. The artcle may come back, but even if it does it will be vastly different and probably fully protected. Like I said before, wouldn't you rather have a stable ED that won't go down every other week than one shitty over edited article? 21:14, 28 July 2011 (CEST)

I agree fully, and I really don't feel like going through any of that stuff again. Still, it would at least be nice for lulz value... but I reiterate; it would be prudent to protect it. Some dude 21:20, 28 July 2011 (CEST)

Also, every thing notable Sherrod has done (ED, LJDrama, mediacrat) is already documented here. The article itself was no more than an unfunny attack, as opposed to the old article which was unfunny vanity shit. 21:25, 28 July 2011 (CEST)

¯\(°_o)/¯ Some dude 21:27, 28 July 2011 (CEST)