Talk:Bath Salts

This article is only getting stupider everyday.

• First the pony-freak makes a shitty article composed of TWO WHOLE IMAGES! And he still has the audacity to call it perfect.
• Then Mike the Great takes out the perfect template. This article's not perfect? No shit.
• Now Onideus adds ONE more picture, please don't encourage LordBony.

As of now, I'm 100% sure that both LordTony and Onideus are new to this, seeing as they can't even take out the border on a file.

This is what you two did: [[File:Did a naked man eat your face off.PNG|frame|center]]

I think this is what you meant to do: [[File:Did a naked man eat your face off.PNG|center]]

Do you see how the latter has no waste-of-space border?

I say merge it to Rudy Eugene, because whoever made that article at least put a little effort into it. -Gray 08:50, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

Actually I just copied and pasted the previous code and then slapped in the file name...which is probably what most people do. I only found this page by searching for "bath salts", I didn't know there was another page until it came up in the "Recent Changes" and then added it there...although oddly enough the other article doesn't actually mention the "bath salts" thing at all...that should probably be fixed before they're merged. --Onideus 08:55, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

Mmmm, also I kind of thought the "perfect" thing was being facetious/sarcastic. Some articles can indeed be summed up in just a single image. Sometimes people will post single images along with "EOT" or "EOF" or other basic text, as a kind of sarcastic way of mocking all the discussion. --Onideus 09:03, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

The entire point of me making this article was to put little effort into it. I put the "perfect" tag in there ironically. I thought someone was going to put this into the "why is there an article" category. Lord Tony 12:00, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

• Judging by all your reactions you all seem to say the same question. Why is there an article? I think I did my job right, thank you. Lord Tony 12:14, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

The article is fine. This is a WIKI, if you think something needs work then FUCKING FIX IT YOURSELF. There is no need to merge anything. --zaiger (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2012 (EDT)

I was hoping you'd say that. -Gray 11:22, 20 June 2012 (EDT)

Since when were articles meant to be serious anyways? Lord Tony 04:59, 21 June 2012 (EDT)

Since when were articles meant to be shit? -Gray 06:01, 21 June 2012 (EDT)

Please direct yourself to why is there an article thank you very much. Lord Tony 06:03, 21 June 2012 (EDT)

the notion of ingesting bath salts to get high is hilarious (except to the dude who lost his face), also how was this discovery made? maybe someone was desperate enough to try smoking (injecting??) everything under the sink. apparently, they are only called bath salts to circumvent the war on drugs. prohibition loses again. anyway people are more likely to contribute to a stub than start a new article imo. -hipcrime 12:25, 24 June 2012 (EDT)