Talk:Anonymous

Missing pics

Image:Anonysex02.jpg

Present 17:05, 4 July 2012 (EDT)

- Mr Jonzz 17:05, 4 July 2012 (EDT)

Redlinks

PROTIP: Do not confuse Anonymous with:

• User:Anonymous or

The Declaration of /b/ Independence

/b/day

Related Articles

• Anonquestions
• WeathermanKevin has declared war on Anonymous.

Newfags Listen up

Freud = Jew = first psychologist

I

am going to rewrite this whole page, dont let me forget ♥♥♥ 01:20, 23 April 2012 (EDT)

Cleanup

This article could use a good cleaning and an expansion to discuss the old vs new Anonymous phenomena. --zaiger (talk) 01:58, 23 April 2012 (EDT)

GALLERY ERROR

I've had a look at the code and can't see anything obvious; then again I am a negrotic mongoloid.

- Mr Jonzz 17:07, 4 July 2012 (EDT)

I just looked in firefox and opera and don't see anything at all. What browser are you using? Mike the Great (talk) 01:57, 5 July 2012 (EDT)

IE @ work... not sure of the version but definitely a couple short of current. First and only time I've ever had that happen; all other galleries open fine and dandy... /shrugs shoulders - Mr Jonzz 22:12, 4 July 2012 (EDT)

I tried IE FF and Opera and it works in all of them. I dunno, lol. Like you said, there's nothing obviously wrong with it, and if I can't see the problem I can't try trial and error. Mike the Great (talk) 02:25, 5 July 2012 (EDT)

If all the CG's were opening like that I could see it being a browser problem, it's only that one though and I've opened ones with moar images/loads of GIFs fine. - Mr Jonzz 22:40, 4 July 2012 (EDT)

Copyedit Needed Please

That portion I added right up near the top, on "What?" (is Anonymous), I'd really like that copy edited/altered whenever someone gets the chance. People are copying and pasting it all over the damn place and it's something I took out of my "book material" stash...

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=584770114886138&l=717be180aa

...so I'd rather not have it attributed to every random script kiddy fuck job that rips it off ED and runs around trying to pass it off as their own before I actually even finish writing a book. I don't mind my work attributed to ED (or others who aren't dipshits), but not to a bunch of prepubescent tweenage muppet fucks from fracking 4Chan. --Onideus 00:35, 7 March 2013 (EST)

New article sucks

New article is a bunch of SJW bullshit and a billion times shittier than the old one

reverted and if someone wants to 'fix' it please remember that anonymous isn't the cause oriented faggots from tumblr and reddit wearing guy fawkes masks they bought at comicon.  — Preceding comment added by Fullmetal (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

The original version already exists on a seperate page, numbnuts:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Anonymous/Original

--Onideus 21:24, 9 May 2013 (EDT)

The original article is much better than this moralfag, redditshit, guy fawkes wearing circlejerk of a page. This page is the reason old anonymous should destroy new anonymous. Anonymous was about lulz. Remember when ED was also about lulz? Now its filled to the brim with Lefitst OWS-tier moralfags. GreenAnon 04:56, 19 May 2013 (EDT)

You know, this a wiki. 05:16, 19 May 2013 (EDT)

I had to google OWS... loldongymous! • Mr.Jonzz 05:34, 19 May 2013 (EDT)

Child, you don't even know what the fuck Anonymous is. Go home, wannabe script kiddy, nobody likes you. --Onideus 13:42, 19 May 2013 (EDT)

Yes because Anonymous is about being social justice faggots that drink to much Marxism kool-aid. NO! Anonymous has always been about the lulz. We did Chanology because we thought it would have been funny to troll crazy cultists. We did the Habbo hotel raid because it was hilarious doing swastikas and harming the minds of children. We closed the pools due to aids because we could. Now anonymous is about some gay ass social justice leftist extravaganza thats out of control.GreenAnon 17:29, 20 May 2013 (EDT)

WOW! It's AMAZING! I mean...it's like you CAN'T FUCKING READ or something! Hurr de durr! I mean, how the fuck could you miss this:

First and foremost, Anonymous is NOT a group, or an organization, or coherent collective of any sort. Anonymous is more like...an idea, a concept. Technically everyone and anyone is Anonymous. It's simply the name given to any collective action carried out virally by a large mass of people. Its ranks, goals, intentions and ideals are completely fluid, changing as easily as the wind. It's a kind of social ocean that occasionally builds itself up into a massive tsunami of sheer social willpower. The ocean isn't organized, it's not a sentient presence, it's not a "group", it merely is what it is...nature. THAT is what Anonymous is, it is simply the collective social nature of the Internet itself.

The article isn't about trying to CLASSIFY Anonymous as having any particular persuasions or directed points of interests, but rather to DOCUMENT Anonymous happenings...that is, to document the collective social ocean as it were, its tides, tsunamis and all out epic fucking shit storms! Essentially, yer all pissy and indignant because the collective social ocean of the Internet isn't doing what *YOU* a *SINGLE INDIVIDUAL* ~wants~ it to. In other words, yer a mouthy little shit stain who wishes you had some power or control over that collective, largely UNCONTROLLABLE, social ocean. Basically it's not doing what you want it to so you're acting like a little snit and whining like a little bitch about it. Don't like what Anonymous is doing? Well ya best brush up on yer social engineering skills, Sunshine, cause that's the ONLY potential and possible way to try and exercise any level of control over the largely uncontrollable Anonymous hordes. --Onideus 18:00, 20 May 2013 (EDT)

Anynoymous as a group was just a bunch of bored neckebeards looking for lulz. This social justice garbage you seem to align yourself with is but a sham, a means to control subversion. Oh and btw I hope that long ass masturbation of a wall of text was written ironically cause if not then you need to lay off the kool-aid.GreenAnon 04:23, 22 May 2013 (EDT)

Right then...so I was right the first time...you can't fucking read. *nods* Sorry yer idiot, neglectful parents have you drugged up on so much Ritalin you can't even manage to make it through one single sentence before being ~overwhelmed~ by such HUUUUGE "text walls". LOL Also, that phrase, "social justice"...yeah, pretty sure it doesn't mean what you THINK it means, kiddo. Ya wanna know something though...I'm PSYCHIC! :D

No, srsly, I really am...for example...I ~know~ what the real issue is here...I ~know~ what yer REALLY so pissy and indignant about...it's because you helped WRITE the previous version of the article...innt kiddo? And that's what's REALLY got you all up in a snit...cause you just can't STAND having ~your~ particular little self-important version of the article swept aside like yesterdays news...it just BURNS you, doesn't it? ^__^

--Onideus 13:20, 22 May 2013 (EDT)

The best part is how he implies direct involvement by spouting "we did this" and "we did that". I'd have taken him more seriously if he used the word "they" instead. Aside from that, mainstream Anon is undeniably moralfag however there are still lulzy subsections within, you just have to know where to look. I believe the current article properly reflects that. If he wants only for the old-anon to be showcased, he's living in a state of denial and making a desperate attempt to hold on to a time long passed. For the sake of argument, the old article is a blistering pile of text block and assorted quotes, while the new one is far more concise. Uberfukken 13:42, 22 May 2013 (EDT)

WE ARE EVERYWHERE, WE ARE LEGION, WE GUZZLE JIZZ, EXPECT US! Anon 19:27, 22 May 2013 (EDT)