Registration has been disabled and the moderation extension has been turned off.
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.

User talk:Glenda Jackson

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>CinoxFellpyre at 21:16, 20 October 2011. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Welcome, Glenda Jackson

This is serious. READ IT.

Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.

We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:

  • Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable. Further tutorials of use can be found here.
  • To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
  • Sign your comments by using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
  • These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help; we promise.
  • The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page; just look at the top left of the page. Check it daily.
  • Use Special:Upload to upload pictures. Be sure to give them meaningful names. Also, do not upload any CP or Bestiality pr0n or you will be b&.
  • Feeling social? Enjoy forums? Join here.
  • See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.

H64 22:22, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

RE: why

The article needs clean up before anything else. Some kids from 4chan turned it into complete shit. Your edits just didn't fit in with the article as it is at the moment. If you want to clean it up, go for it.

Meepsheep

03:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Basically, we don't need anything else calling Sherrod a fat kike, whore, pig, etc. I am not defending her, but the article has enough of

that already.

Meepsheep

03:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

RE: : )

Thanks. --JuniusThaddeus 02:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Dox

That's what I was asking JT, some cases is vague and I wanted a deeper explanation--Shika 02:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I hadn't read ED:101 on the old ED, I only lurked and didn't edit, what was the picture of, dox rules or something?--Shika 02:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Just for the record: [1] --Glenda Jackson 21:52, 16 October 2011 (CEST)

Hi Retard.

WHAT PART OF DO NOT FUCK WITH IT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? --CinoxFellpyre 22:39, 19 October 2011 (CEST)

I don't care how unfunnny it is to you, the template was made for a reason. If you have a problem with it, take it to a SysOp. instead of removing it. --CinoxFellpyre 23:16, 20 October 2011 (CEST)