- Portals
- The Current Year
- ED in the News
- Admins
- Help ED Rebuild
- Archive
- ED Bookmarklet
- Donate Bitcoin
Contact an admin on Discord or EDF if you want an account. Also fuck bots.
Talk:Zeartist
Took some time to read over this today. From what I've read, it looks like the problem with the article are the following:
- Not as abrasive as the normal tone of ED articles
- Sometimes some of the words (maybe all) feel like they're wrongly blue-linked. I can't exactly explain the feeling, but it's like the pipe either shouldn't be there or feels out of place.
- Not as amusing screenshot captions
Do these issues of the article stand out to anyone else? I think I'm missing several things on why the article isn't as lulzy.
OhSoSimple fucking wants your soul. You can help by NOT GIVING it. 00:48, 15 May 2012 (EDT)
- So rewrite it?
- Encyclopedia Dramatica:Why not pipe?
- remove them/replace them with better?
- overall it reads like another people article to me. It's not exactly in any way well written or popular, I wouldn't spend the time on it personally. It's tagged with {{crap}} and has been for a year. Also nice to have you back. Mike the Great (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2012 (EDT)
- I probably will to try getting my skills back up, provided IRL stuff doesn't suffocate me again or if I spontaneously find something more interesting to touch up or write about.
- That pretty much describes the feeling I got from reading it.
- If and when I get around to digging the original shots, which most likely came from that MST mentioned in the article.
- Also, thank you. Hopefully I can get some good content out during the upcoming break.
OhSoSimple fucking wants your soul. You can help by NOT GIVING it. 01:40, 15 May 2012 (EDT)