File talk:Garfield 32.JPG

Wait wut? Why exactly are we keeping duplicates? Uberfukken 06:28, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

Such is the word from on high. Perhaps due to hotlink SEO? idk  VX  • 06:30, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

Since when exactly? CobaltCat 06:33, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

If that's the case they need to be tagged duplicate unless you want to make a clusterfuck out of unused images.Uberfukken 06:35, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

*bigger clusterfuck. CobaltCat 06:40, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

aight well there's a duplicate category and template now. i wanted to make it so the images in the category would show up on a mainspace page, removing it from unused images. didn't work tho so fuck it. Uberfukken 07:13, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

Encyclopedia_Dramatica:Thizzlehat_Junction_Center/Archive/30#STOP_DELETING_DUPLICATE_IMAGES   Sickpuppy  10:34, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

I seem to have missed that MEMO. Does this also count for extremely shitty duplicates? CobaltCat 11:01, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

It's to my understanding that the only images that ever need deleted are illegal/disallowed ones, and images which the original uploader has requested be removed on their behalf. Attempting to rid the unused image gallery of all its duplicate files is a fruitless effort anyway if ya think about it.  Sickpuppy  11:22, 4 July 2014 (EDT)